Sending Bills and collecting payment from customers costs every organisation 5% of Revenue on average!-can this really be correct?

According to several leading research companies who look at international billing and payment issues on an ongoing basis, (including  perhaps the leader in the field of billing research -Billentis) they say, that on average, the overall cost of sending out a bill or invoice and then collecting payment from the customer, is anywhere from £4 to £17 per invoice. Unfortunately, apart from the fact that this is a pretty big range, it tends to create an unnecessary defensiveness in organisations (and often in the finance department in particular) who understandably become very keen to point out that they spend nowhere near that kind of money on such a mundane and clerical activity (although they will often fail to include many of the indirect and hidden costs of the process). Another recently published general statistic, however, could be much more useful and may make a few divisional heads and even CEO’s sit up and think about the efficiency and effectiveness of their billing and payments practices for the first time. This is the statement that on average, an organisation spends 5% of its revenue on issuing its invoices and in collecting payments from customers.  In this article, we will explore this claim and see if it reflects reality for both small and large organisations. To do this we will look at the figures based on two real businesses.

First and foremost let’s deal with the “on average” part of the 5% of revenue claim. What is being done here is to look at many organisations of many sizes and types and simply working out the median or middle value in a range of numbers.  In this case the median cost of billing and collecting payment in proportion to total revenues is 5%. Of course, this means that they are some companies that may be higher or lower than this but statistically, we can say that around two-thirds of all companies would fall into this average of 4%.

The Small Company

The first company (let’s call them Alpha) employs 26 people, has a turnover of £5 million in total revenues per annum. This is earned by selling goods and services at an average of £500 on average each time. Hence their total bills in a year are 12,000 or 1,000 per month. There are two broad cost categories that we now need to look at –staff and transaction costs.

On the staff side, Alpha have one accountant (on a salary of £45,000 per annum, three clerical admin people (at a salary of £21,000 each) and two people answering the phones (at a salary of £17,500 each). Hence, the all up payroll for this group of people is £143,000. The three clerical admin people devote all of their time to billing and payments but the accountant and customer service people devote only 50% of their time to this activity. Hence, we can say the cost of the people’s time which is devoted to billing and payments is £103,000. However, the company has staff overhead costs of 40% (cost of offices, equipment, training etc) which brings this cost up to a total of £144,200.

On the transaction cost side, 40% of the 12,000 bills are paid by cheque, 10% by BACS, 30% by phone (half by debit card and half by credit card), and 20% by cash. For cheques the bank charge fees of £1,200 (£0.25 pence times 4,800 cheques). For BACS, a charge is made of 15 pence per transaction (so £0.15*12000*0.1 or £180). For cash handling the bank charges a flat annual fee of £500 for all cash deposits of this size. For cost of transactions by phone, on the debit side the company pays £0.35 pence per transaction or £630 and on the credit side 2.5% of each transaction value (£500*0.025*1800 transactions or £22,500). Finally, we have to worry about how long it takes to get paid (and the cost of borrowing money to operate and allow for possibly late payments). Given that this small company has average invoice days outstanding of forty, they have to cover this £500 for 40 days or just under 11% of the year. As Alpha is paying interest at 5%, this means the cost to fund the necessary float is £26,027.

There are also a few direct invoicing costs for Alpha to bear including printing invoices, paper, envelopes, stamps and even marketing material (to also design and print). This adds up to a total of £0.90 per invoice (the stamp alone being half of this). We therefore have a total annual cost of £10,800. This makes the grand total on the transactional side of things £61,837. If we total all of the above, we now have a grand total billing and collection cost of £206,037. As a % of the £5 million in revenues this is 4.12% (or what would be £17.17 per invoice). 

The Large Company

The second company (lets call them Beta), employs 525 people, has a turnover of £90 million in total revenues per annum. This is earned by selling goods and services at an average of £58 each time. Hence, their total bills in a year are 1,551,725 or 129,310 per month on average. Once again, there are two broad cost categories that we now need to look at –staff and transaction costs.

On the staff side, Beta have a team of eight accountants (on an average salary of £48,000 per annum each, thirty-two clerical admin people doing bookkeeping, settlement and reconciliation (at a salary of £23,500 each) and a call-centre with sixty people answering the phones (at a salary of £18,500 each on average). Hence, the all up payroll for this group of people is £2,214,000. The Beta company does not keep detailed records but estimates that billing and collecting payments occupies about 60% of the time of this whole team. Hence, the cost of the people’s time, which is devoted to billing and payments is £1,347,600. However, the company has staff overhead costs of 45% (cost of offices, equipment, training etc) which brings this cost up to a total of £ £1,954,020.

On the transaction cost side, 20% of the 1,323,530 bills are paid by cheque, 20% by BACS, 50% by phone (half by debit card and half by credit card), 5% by cash and 5% via Beta’s Internet bank site portal. For cheques the bank charges fees of £52,941 (£0.20 pence times 264,706 cheques). For BACS, a charge is made of 12 pence per transaction (so £0.12*264,706 or £31,765). For cash handling the bank charges a flat annual fee of £15,000 for all cash deposits of this size. For cost of transactions by phone, on the debit side the company pays £0.30 pence per transaction or £99,265 and on the credit side 1.8% of each transaction value (£58*0.018*330,883). transactions or £405,000). Finally, we have to worry about how long it takes to get paid (and the cost of borrowing money to operate and allow for possibly late payments. This company has average invoice days outstanding of 45, they have to cover this £68 for each transaction for 45 days or 12.3% of the year. As the Beta company is paying interest at 5%, this means the cost to fund the necessary float is £553,500.

There are also a few direct invoicing costs for Beta to bear including sending invoices (which Beta does via email not paper unless it is requested by a customer), monthly mailed statements and accompanying marketing material (to also print and design). This is a total of £0.40 per invoice. We therefore have a total annual cost of £620,690. This makes the grand total on the transactional side of things £1,860,054.

If we total all of the above (all staff plus all transaction costs), we now have a grand total billing and collection cost of £ £3,814,074. As a % of the £90 million in revenues this is 4.24%. (or £2.46 per invoice).

Summary

Although the data from these two very different sized companies cannot in any way constitute a statistically significant result, it is nonetheless quite remarkable that both costs of invoicing and collection are so close. At 4.12% and 4.24% respectively they are also only a little less than the 5% average claim made by the research companies. In fact, it is a reasonable assumption that a few more “hidden costs” still need to be added to both sides here (which may completely close the gap). For example, the small company Alpha added no costs for the senior managers (GM and CFO) who both spend some of their time in payment matters, nor for the extra bank charges for bounced cheques, debt collection and writing off-unpaid invoices (issues also not included for Beta also). And, in the large company, there were some system and invoice storage costs that were excluded. This may well have made both % numbers even closer to the 5% figure and possibly slightly higher.

In the final analysis, this is just the data from two individual companies. However, they seem to provide a useful general justification to the claim and serve as a basis for calculating the actual figures for almost any business. This may be especially useful ahead of talking with online digital bill presentment and payment companies that often claim that they can reduce these costs by up to 50%-if this is true, what a great way to lift revenues by up to 2.5%!

Will fees for processing online payments disappear completely?

For many years now, banks and other financial intuitions have been generating revenue from transactional fees of one kind or another. In fact, these fees can make up a large proportion of overall revenues and corresponding profits (in some cases constituting up to 50% of all profits in some banks). 

In general, fees fall into two categories-those that are charged to the end customer or the consumer and those that are charged to an organisation or merchant, when it wants to allow payment services to its customers.

Direct Customer fees

Transactional fees categories typically apply only to the customers of a given bank (as the bank has no direct relationship with other consumers) and even then, only when a customer has gone beyond what is deemed to be the core commercial relationship that the bank is prepared to offer at no direct cost. Hence, fees are typically charged to customers when they have overdrawn an account, written a cheque in circumstances where they are insufficient funds to cover it, or perhaps used an Automated teller machine or ATM in another banks’s network.. However, even here, a bank will allow many transactions without fees, if a customer maintains a positive balance (sometimes with a minimum threshold) or commits to regular income being paid in or saved every month. This is because banks worry a lot about customer “churn” and know that fees can often be a “switching factor” if they become too much of an irritant to an account holder (especially now that opening another bank account can be done online very easily in many cases).  The simple logic here is that it is more cost effective and profitable to keep good customers who transact regularly with a bank (and for the most part in the black) for what might be many years, than to risk losing them completely over a fair but nonetheless irritating fee that “pushes them over the edge”.  Even though this results in what might be seen as a better deal for the end consumer, banks still have to find ways to recover their internal transactional costs in some way. For some transactions, such as  bank cheques, wire transfers and transactions involving foreign exchange a customer will be relatively happy to pay (as these are often one off instances). However, these fees will not always cover the costs involved completely and it therefore often falls to the other major category to provide other fees that can cover costs and the bank’s overhead-the merchant.

Merchant fees

Although every individual commercial merchant relationship will be different, depending on a given organisation’s size, type of business, types of services offered etc, banks will typically charge a very wide variety of fees to most merchants.

The most obvious fees charged to merchants (because they have been around for a long time) are for cash and cheque handling. In both cases, these payment transactions are expensive for any financial institution because they involve human intervention and data entry (sometimes carried out multiple times). As with an end consumer, a merchant may be able to bring about lower fees by maintaining a positive balance or “float”. However, it is rare for any merchant these days to be able to operate without an overdraft at least some of the time, so fees in this area need to be monitored carefully.

Outside cash and cheque payments, the majority of fees that are charged by a bank a credit and debit card use fees. Cards are typically issued to a consumer without charge, and with no transaction fees when they are paid off regularly. However, the merchant will be charged for every transaction that a customer makes with a credit and/pr debit card and this may be a very complex affair. In some cases, the fee charged will be a single “aggregate rate” for say credit card use, such as 2.5% of the transaction size. Hence for a £100 consumer purchase, a charge of £2.50 will be made. However, this rate may vary from one transaction to another and this is because the aggregate rate is made up of many sub fees that every merchant needs to know about. Here are just some of the fee types that are typically charged:

The Discount Fee Rate

Credit and debit card companies (Visa and MasterCard being by far the largest of these) have what is called “interchange” rates. They range in price- so in order to make it easier, the merchant providers created three categories.

Qualified Discount Rate – a pre-set or agreed percentage is paid for each pound charged.

Non-Qualified Rate – a fee added to the qualified discount rate in certain transactions. For example, if a merchant does not use an address verification service (AVS) when they manually enter  or take a transaction.

Transaction Fees

This is a specific, flat rate that is paid on every sale processed through the credit card processor. (Sometimes the transaction fee is called the interchange fee, authorization fee, or per inquiry fee).

Address Verification Service (AVS)

Merchant banks charge a small fee for the validation service to ensure that the billing address provided in the online checkout process matches the issuing bank’s records. Not using this service will result in hefty charges on the processing of the card for that sale.

Batch Fees

Merchant banks require that customers close out their transactions a minimum of one time each day. The batch fee pays for expenses for the gateway or software that accesses the credit card processing network. If you don’t have transactions to process, there is no batch fee to pay.

Monthly Statement or Customer Service Fee

Most merchant banks charge a monthly fee in order to cover their monthly costs of operation (paying their customer service team for example).

Monthly Minimum Fee

Many merchant banks providers require a given organisation to process a minimum amounts of sales per month, or they pay a monthly minimum. Monthly minimums tend to range between £15 and £50 per month.

Gateway Fees

There are fees for internet and mail order merchants to use an internet gateway service such as Authorize.net, although some merchant providers will cover this fee on their customer’s behalf as part of the package deal. If you are solely an internet business, you’ll want to look for an internet merchant account that includes the gateway service as part of the package.

Annual Fees

These are often charged by Merchant banks  when free terminal equipment to take payment is offered. There are numerous merchant account providers that do not charge an annual fee, so you may want to shop around if the first few you look at require an annual fee. Sometimes it would be cheaper to purchase the equipment than to pay an ongoing annual fee.

Cancellation/Termination Fees

Most merchant accounts require a contract agreement of one or two years and if you cancel early, you are likely to be charged a termination fee.

Chargeback/Retrieval Fees

When a customer requests a refund (or the customer’s credit card issuer requests a refund), merchant account providers typically charge a “chargeback” fee.

Finding and Using the Right Invoice Template

If you type “free invoice template” into the Google search engine you get about 40 million returned results. Clearly then there is a lot of interest in trying to find and use an effective invoice process (and ideally a cheap or free one) so in this article we will explore what is available and what options appear to deliver the greatest benefits.

Whether you are a one person business or a giant multi-national, getting an invoice to a customer is the beginning a long process in getting paid. Hence, it is important to get this invoice to a customer quickly (once a product has been supplied or service rendered) but it is equally critical that it is clear and encourages the earliest possible payment.

Fifty years ago, hand-written or simply typed invoices sent through the mail were the norm. Today, we have many other options (although these old-fashioned practices have far from disappeared completely). Perhaps the simplest of these is to use an pre-designed template and popular desk top applications like word for windows and an excel spreadsheet package both have several design alternatives to choose from. In both cases these provide a well-designed looking invoices and provide prompt space for particular customer names, address details, product or services provided and the cost involved. They even allow space for logos to be added if desired. 

Outside the standard templates of desktop applications, there are many relatively cheap and even free software packages which allow invoices to be generated. These work in similar ways to desktop templates but may also generate sequential numbers and allow better storage and retrieval (and avoid the mistake prone process of overtyping the last invoice that was typed).

In both of the above alternatives, the problem is that despite the fact that the invoice can be sent by email as an attachment is still only received as a piece of paper (which the customer can do little with when they receive it and may only print in order to later pay in any case).  As a result, perhaps the best alternative of all is to use a bill presentment service which renders the invoice as a full digital bill. This allows individuals to click on an electronic bill at a web site (ideally rendered in graphical form as they would expect to see it as it appears when posted) and either reveal more bill detail, store it, end it on to someone else to review and most importantly to pay it.

For example, at the PaySwyft web site (www.payswyft.com) sole traders, partnership and companies or all sizes can click on the “free invoice template link” on the home page and use the system to generate an invoice at no cost whatsoever. Like the options described above it provides an clear and clean process for entering invoice details but this is rendered as a full digital bill, meaning that it can be clicked on dynamically to see as much detail as has been entered and perhaps more importantly, it can be paid from within the browser, also electronically. The added bonus here is that the single invoice can then be used (when saved) as a template to generate future invoices much more quickly (because a logo has been added and the design of the overall invoice is relatively set).

How many bills or invoices are sent out each year and to whom are they sent?

Electronic billing has been around in one form or another for over a decade now but according to the Swiss billing research firm Billentis, the penetration of e-bills versus traditional bills remains relatively weak. They estimate the proportion of e-bills to be anywhere between 4% and 9% of the total invoices sent out, but even this range applies only in relatively large businesses (and is increasingly invisible in medium and small businesses), making the overall take up perhaps nearer half of these figures. Furthermore, the proportional take-up of e-billing varies greatly in the two major parts of the market-the Business to Consumer or B2C market, and the Business to Business or B2B market. In this brief article, the aim will therefore be to try to quantify the relative size of the billing market, or perhaps more simply to determine just how many individual bills or invoices are sent out each year and to whom they are sent.

The table below illustrates the typically billing flows, in percentage terms, in these two major market sectors (B2C and B2B) and according to whether a company is large, medium-sized or small.

Although bills can be sent from one consumer to another (C2C), this is a relatively small market (estimated to be less than 1% of all bills). The two large sectors are therefore between businesses and their consumers (B2C) and between businesses (B2B). The B2C and B2B market is close to 50/50 but the B2C market is slightly larger in transactions but quite a lot smaller in terms of transactional value. Let’s look at these two markets in a little more detail individually.

The B2C market
As the above chart shows, large businesses send out the greatest proportion of B2C bills (43.3% of all bills). Medium sized companies send out only 5% and small or micro companies only 1.7%. In the UK as an example, the estimated total volume of bills is around 5 billion per annum. This means that large companies with more than 250 employees send out 2.165 billion bills. Given that the UK adult working population is around 26 million, this means that each consumer gets 80 bills a year on average, from a large organisation of one form or another or around 7 bills a month. They get a further 1.5 bills from medium and small companies, making an average of 8.5 bills a month in total.

As a different example, in the US, the estimated total volume of bills is around 42 billion per annum. This means that large companies with more than 250 employees send out 18.18 billion bills. Given that the US adult working population is around 130 million, this means that each consumer gets 140 bills a year on average from a large organisation of one form or another or around 11.5 bills a month. They get a further 2.5 bills from medium and small companies, making an average of 13 bills a month in total. The higher average consumer bill volume versus the UK may be explainable by two major factors. Illegal workers in the US are not counted in the adult working population figures and the US has Federal and State based system businesses, making for less truly national “super-billers”. For example, in a large utility may bill a large % of the UK population for its gas and electricity needs (a task that may involve a hundred utilities in the US). This makes the average bill volume artificially higher than it may be in reality, perhaps by as much as 15%.

In terms of value, there are no accurate figures relating to the average bill size or amount. However, it is estimated that the average “ticket” in the B2C market is around £65 to £75 (or $75-$95 in the US).

The B2B market
As the above chart also shows, large businesses send out the largest proportion of B2B bills (11.6% of all bills) to other large companies but medium sized companies (employing 50 to 249 employees) send out almost as many at 10% and even small companies account for 7.5% of the total. However, the picture is complicated further by the additional B2B billing that is done between Large, medium and small companies. Hence, in aggregate, large companies send out 15.8% of all bills (11.6%+1.7%+2.5%).

Once again using the UK as an example, this equates to 790 million bills. In the US this would be 6.64 billion bills. Just to complete the picture, medium companies in aggregate send out 18.3% of all bills and small companies in aggregate send out 15.9%. Although this makes the B2B transactional volumes very similar, in aggregate the medium sized companies send out proportionally the most bills.

In terms of value, accurate figures relating to the average bill size or amount are even harder to come by, as companies have very high variations from very low amounts (such as £15 0r £25 for example) to very high amounts (running to thousands or hundreds of thousands in some cases). In addition, there are no formal records kept in terms of average B2B invoice amounts. However, it is broadly estimated that the average “ticket” in the B2B market is around £1500-£2,000 (or $1250-$2500 in the US).

The penetration of ebilling
Once again, definitive figures are difficult to find when it comes to the penetration of ebilling. However, in the B2C market, it is large companies that have made the most progress, led by utilities and telecommunication/mobile phone companies typically. Here, the estimates are that penetration has been in the range 7-9% in Europe, and a little less (6-8% in the US). In medium companies, these numbers are reported to be less than a third of these figures or only 2-3% penetration and in small companies, considerably less than 1%. This leaves a lot of upside potential to switch to ebilling of one form or another across all three organisational size levels.

In the B2B market, it is apparent that accounting software and separate specialist billing software has made some significant inroads into large companies. However, this has largely translated into accounting system driven invoices (or email based invoices with PDF attachments, which are but fully digital bills of course) and as often as not, this has therefore become an additional channel to paper-based invoices, with many organisations reluctant to eliminate physical invoices too quickly. There are also many additional complexities in the B2B market when it comes to billing. This includes integration with purchase order systems, dealing with credit noting, bill line-item dispute handling and multiple decision-maker issues for bill sign-off. This is not to mention the accurate and legal handling of taxation issues. All of this means that the decision to take up ebilling in the B2B space usually involves quite high up-front capital expenditure (on new or changed software), long integration times, changed internal processes and the need to cover monthly fees (e.g. software maintenance and per user etc). There are alternatives to this approach but as yet, interest and take up has been very low.

Summary
A lot of bills are sent out every year in any country with a reasonably well-developed economy. However, it is important to understand that the B2C and B2B markets are very different in terms of transactional volumes, average “ticket” sizes and needs. It is also important to recognise that volumes vary greatly in large, medium and small companies, and their relative interest in making their invoicing practices more efficient will often be very different. This means that the potential for electronic billing take-up is still very high (perhaps as much as 95% of all bills are still not fully digital) but the route to increase overall levels of ebilling take-up needs to be carefully planned for each market segment, in order to be successful.

Why the massive rise in using debit cards matters to all organisations

According to figures released by the payments council at the beginning of 2011, debit card expenditures more or less matched cash expenditures for the first time ever in the UK (and are expected to outstrip it easily in 2011). According to the statistics, there were around 6 billion purchases made using debit cards in the UK during the previous 12 months, an annual rise of nearly 9% and these transactions were worth a combined £265 billion, at an average value of £44 (up 7.5% overall). Yet while there were the much greater 21.4 billion cash transactions made in that same period (which was nonetheless down by 5.2%), the total value of these payments fell by 0.4% to about the same £265 billion figure.

Now clearly, these figures do not mean that cash is disappearing any time soon, especially since these lower average expenditures of £12 or less are often most conveniently settled by cash. However, it does signal that a lot of non-retail spending in particular is shifting to debit card use (and even some retail too with the interest in payment using NFC technology and smart phones in the near future) and perhaps the greatest area in which this likely to be significant is in paying bills (especially those sent from Government or Business to consumers).

What is driving this trend is that cheque writing is falling steadily (and of course is planned to disappear by 2018 in the UK). In fact, over 100 million fewer cheques were written in the UK in 2010 by consumers and it is the debit card that seems to be the preferred alternative, rather than the credit card. In 2010, credit cards accounted for £125.4 billion worth of payments, an annual fall of 0.7%, with 2 billion separate purchases (making an average credit card transaction £63). Hence, debit card transactions outnumbered credit card payments by three to one and represented more than twice the overall spend.

So what does all of this change mean for organisations on how they currently do business? Well first and foremost, accepting payment by debit card becomes pretty critical. Many small businesses (and even a few medium to large ones) do not at the moment and may well lose customers to competitors in the future. Beyond this perhaps obvious issue is the fact in the modern world people are happy to save as much time as they can and a debit card can often meet this need for faster transaction time and greater convenience (especially when paying over the web).

The benefits of accepting, and even encouraging debit card payments are many for the organisation and include:
•Less trips to the bank (with cash and/or cheques)
•Greater security (with less cash and cheques to keep safe)
•Extended opening hours for payment (allowing customers to pay by telephone or over the Internet 24/7 and 365 days a year-an outcome that can be set up immediately with a relationship with a web billing and payment portal such as PaySwyft.
•A faster transfer of funds to the organisation’s bank account than most other methods
•Generally cheaper than handling cash or credit cards
•Typically much lower charge-back risks than with credit cards

Each of the above is probably compelling reason enough for any business to take debit card payments, but in combination and given this payment type’s rapidly increasing popularity amongst consumers, the decision becomes extremely compelling in today’s fast-moving commercial climate.