The Value of Encouraging Direct Debit Payments

A direct debit is an instruction that a bank account holder (usually a merchant) gives their bank to collect a variable amount directly from another account (usually a given customer). A direct debit is also often called a pre-authorised debit or pre-authorised payment. Direct debits are initiated by the recipient (merchant), as opposed to the Payer (customer), which means that the payer is not in control of the payment. This is quite different to a standing order, which tends to be set up by a customer as a fixed amount payment and can be cancelled by them at any time.

Direct debit payments have become very popular with large merchants in recent years (such as utilities, telecom companies and councils for example) because they allow the merchant to obtain an open mandate from a customer to transfer variable amounts of money out of a bank account on a regular basis.  This make direct debit apparently very good for the merchant (with high levels of control over customer payments). But is this really the case as in reality there are both pros and cons to consider?

 

ADVANTAGES:

DISADVANTAGES:

1. Having a direct debit mandate saves a merchant time as automatic payment is set up to occur regularly by a customer on a given date. The payment is also known and easily reconciled as thee are full records of the transaction.   2. Direct debits tend to avoid late payments by a customer (avoiding chase letters or phone calls or even worse, disconnection notices, and late fees and penalties.   3. Direct debit is cost effective for the merchant as a payment method (at least on the surface-see point 4 in disadvantages). A merchant typically gains the benefit of planned cash-flow at a very low cost (with direct debits costing between a fixed15-25 pence on average).   4. Direct debits provide more security for the merchant and the customer by being made electronically. This is both secure and proof of payment appears on the customer bank statement.

1. A customer needs to trust a given merchant to give bank account access to them or to want to sign a mandate.   2. A customer account has to have adequate funds to cover payments when they’re due. If this is not the case, apart from the loss of payment (and cash-flow) a reversal will occur (see point 4)   3. A bank account may be closed by the bank due to fraud or some other reason.  This will lead to reversal fees (see point 4 below.)   4. Reversals across UK direct debits run at about 4 in one hundred (4%) and cause considerable problems for the merchant. It may cost as much as £30 to set up a new direct debit with a customer. What this means in practice is that these 4 in 100 reversals have to be spread over all 100 (or £120 in total divided by 100 or £1.20 needs to be added to the 20 pence average cost). This means that the real cost of a direct debit is more like £1.40 on average.   5. If a Payer wants to change banks, a merchant will need to set up new direct debit mandates again which is time consuming. Also, merchants need to keep a record of any direct debit mandate from their customers for a 7 year period.

 There is an alternative to direct debit that is available at www.payswyft.com. This is called “dynamic debit” and is set up by the customer rather than the merchant. This payment method is most typically linked with a customer’s debit card (although a credit card can also be used). These recurrent payments can be made indefinitely on a variable basis like a direct debit, but has one major difference. A customer can set a maximum limit (say £50) and have the Payswyft system alert them (by SMS or email) so that they can approve the payment (or query it with the merchant before it is settled). As the cost of this debit-side payment is around 35 pence each time (and has almost no risk of cancellation, reversal or chargeback as transactions are run through the 3D secure system) they are a true win-win for both the merchant and the customer.