Although it is always extremely difficult to make predictions about an industry which changes as fast as online payments (including online bill presentment) there are always a few “clues, trends and patterns” around to draw upon. As a result and as it’s close to the start of a new year, in this article we will seek to make a few predictions about what is likely to happen in the near future. To do this we will use a number of key headings that are often seen to be important in this industry.
The general changes that we can expect
In broad terms, the payments landscape (which is still very paper or physical form-based in so many ways) will continue to switch inexorably to an online environment at many levels with “barcode type” paper to replace physical monetary exchange products like cheques and cash in the next few years and possibly even Card (debit, credit and pre-paid) in the more distant future. The market will increasingly use smart phone and PC tablet as a channel, although the infrastructure required to support this will take as long as 20 years to make the full transition.
Online person-to-person or P2P payments will increase using mobile devices or social network sites as the initiation point. In the early days of this transition, bank account details will need to be known but accessing and using cleared funds (as the way customers want to interact will each) will see more new players emerging outside of the traditional banking community.
While banks are competing with each other for market share, new players entirely are likely to be able to capture payment market share away from their base, by better satisfying the needs of market. PayPal, Google & Apple are good examples of this or it may be entirely new companies that are yet to become well-known.
The cultural shift to perform everyday functions on-line is still in its infancy. While on-line shopping is growing exponentially, other behaviour will move more towards online. For example, full digital bill presentment and payment services.
So, if that’s the general scene, let’s look at what might happen under a few specific headings
TIMELINESS & CHOICE
Customers want to choose when they pay, day or night, 24/7, 365 days of the year and whether to pay ‘just in time’ or in real time. Customers want very wide payment type options and the ability to choose which option best suits each payment activity.
In many cases, recipients of funds prefer real-time or same-day settlement. Surety of settlement in real time will be critical in most cases.
ACCESSIBILITY
Customers want to access the same payment options regardless of the channel by which they pay. For example, this may be the same payment choice regardless of whether they are in a store, at an on-line store or paying a bill.
Merchants will increasingly prefer to receive funds from the same payment options, regardless of channel, to reduce vendor management and improve internal efficiencies.
EASE OF USE
Customer like payment types that are easy to use and one they understand and trust. Mobile, PC tablet & social network usage is making the introduction of new payment processes easier to manage and educate the market, but present other challenges for the payment industry as a whole.
EASE OF INTEGRATION WITH OTHER PROCESSES
Online payments will grow steadily and will ultimately dominate the payment landscape. However, capability and capacity to integrate with internal computer systems will be a barrier that will need to be overcome. Seamless integration with Point-of-Sale systems, on-line store, ERP, inventory systems and billing engines will be a critical factor.
Cloud-based technology will assist in keeping capital outlay lower and at manageable levels while providing high speed access to the payment instruments and associated internal systems.
RELIABILITY
The new payment instruments and channels that arise will need to be ever more reliable. Traditional payment providers can still play a huge role in ensuring that high quality standards and suitable interoperability is maintained ensure the instrument can be trusted.
Convenience can sometimes trump reliability, but both having both is likely to be a winning combination.
PRICING
New payment instruments will have to be cost effective is all cases and this will start to happen slowly.
What is blurring the price aspect is merchants will try to demand low transactional costs even when real demonstrable value is being added. For example, instant bank transfer provides significantly more benefits to both a consumer and a merchant and yet the expectation would be that this should be priced the same as, or even lower than, the transactional cost to write a paper-based cheque.
Another example is that presenting an electronic invoice with a wide range of payment options would be significantly more cost effective than a biller managing their own bill collection, even though individual transaction pricing by payment type may be more expensive in that particular silo.
SECURITY AND ROBUSTNESS
Similar to the reliability heading, secure and robust payment instruments will be increasingly essential, although convenience and ease-of-use are considerations that will often dilute how secure and robust the new instrument has to be in practice.
INTEROPERABILITY
All online digital Payment systems will have a much higher degree of interoperability with other systems than they do now. This will apply to the movement of money (where necessary) and more particularly to data transmission. The intelligent design of this data transition process (nationally and internationally) will be done by at least one large player outside current financial services sector or by a new market entrant.
RISK MANAGEMENT
Much richer risk management tools will be available and these will have sophisticated algorithms that track all payment patterns and provide risk attenuation or control options at every level. This is likely to be a new software-based market entrant.
Summary
No-one has a “crystal-ball” to predict the future, but the online payments space is changing rapidly around us. It will be interesting to see whether, we are still heading in the general direction that this article suggests in 12 months time and whether some of the forecasts are starting to come true or not.
Showing posts with label credit card. Show all posts
Showing posts with label credit card. Show all posts
Wednesday, 1 February 2012
Wednesday, 21 December 2011
Is it "Safe" to View and Pay Bills online?
As Internet technology now allows bills or invoices to be presented electronically and then paid at the presenting web site (whether this is a bank’s site, merchant site or third-party site) in this brief article we investigate whether this carries any significant risk from a payee/consumer or merchant perspective.
Perhaps the very first test of potential “riskiness” when using any electronic presentment and payment (or EBPP for short) web site is whether it is secure. The vast majority of web page addresses, also known as URLs, typically begin with "http." However, to pay bills online, the web page should always start with "https," which signifies a secure socket layer or SSL connection (or one in which data is fully encrypted). This typically means that you can see a padlock icon, usually in the top or bottom corner of the browser window (or in some cases it may even turn the URL address background green or light blue). Clicking the padlock icon will often reveal the site's security certificate (and allow you to read about the particular protection that this affords).
Now that a consumer knows that he or she is on a secure site, the next step is to ensure that the login process is secure. A good site will usually give a consumer two options-to pay instantly or as a guest, and to register on the site to use it again and save time on the next occasion the consumer uses it. As a guest, a web site will typically only ask for an email address and then ask a consumer how he or she would like to pay from the options they make available. This may mean entering debit or credit card details for example, which should then give a consumer the option to confirm the transaction (and then as a further security step run the transaction through 3D secure-a process used by major credit card companies as an added XML layer for online credit and debit card transactions. Visa call this process “Verified by Visa”, MasterCard call it “MasterCard SecureCode”, JCB International call it “J/Secure” and American Express call this “SafeKey”. Overall then, a well-constructed site will offer a safe payment system for consumers (and there are card and bank protections on fraud and low limitations on consumer liability in any case). Even so, consumers should also look for extra safety in specific statements on any given EBPP site about PCI compliance (or payment card industry standard adherence) and/or that credit/debit card data or numbers will not be stored or saved in any way (and if they are, that they will be fully encrypted and tokenised as a further protection against theft or fraud).
When registering (either before or after a bill had been viewed and paid) a well-designed and safe web sites will ask a consumer to set up a user name and password that he or she can remember and that identifies the consumer every time he or she uses the site in the future. The site may also ask for additional data such as email address, physical address, date of birth, driving license number or even passport number. In some cases, they may go yet further and ask security questions to help validate a consumer’s identity in the case of a future forgotten login ID or password. Although these may seem personal and even intrusive, these steps are all designed to protect consumer security and ensure that only one person is able to see the bills posted and to effect payment of any kind. In other words, this process allows the web site operator (financial institution or merchant) to know the customer (a process they call KYC) and protect everyone’s security to the best of their ability.
In general, research suggests that consumers worry most about using credit and debit cards on online sites of any kind. However, in the world of bill payment (as opposed to online shopping for example) these risks are not as great. Even a person with a stolen credit card number is highly unlikely to pay a bill for another person (assuming he or she had the bill details to enter) and even if they did, the risk would be with the merchant and not the consumer. So what about merchant side risk?
For a merchant, the greatest risk is charge-backs. This is where the credit or debit card holder disputes the transaction anywhere up to 6 months after the transaction date. Charge backs can either be because the card holder disputes that they made the transaction at all (i.e. it was a stolen or fraudulent), or because they did receive anything in return for the payment that was made. The second reason for chargebacks in the bill pay space is very rare, but the first reason-theft or fraud is obviously quite common (with total estimated costs of just under £1 billion in the UK in 2010). This is why online billpay web sites need to take so much care to ensure that card holders (who are not present as they are in a retail transaction) are who they say they are.
Summary
In the final analysis, for those EBPP sites that have a clear secure socket payment layer (SSL), have clear statements about security of information and sound compliance and a well-structured registration process, consumers face very low levels of risk (with a very low liability even when a rare problem may arise in any case). The merchant however, faces potentially much more risk arising from both debit and credit card fraud (and therefore possible charge-backs), but risk this can be mitigated with good consumer checking processes that are made easy for every customer to the site to use.
Perhaps the very first test of potential “riskiness” when using any electronic presentment and payment (or EBPP for short) web site is whether it is secure. The vast majority of web page addresses, also known as URLs, typically begin with "http." However, to pay bills online, the web page should always start with "https," which signifies a secure socket layer or SSL connection (or one in which data is fully encrypted). This typically means that you can see a padlock icon, usually in the top or bottom corner of the browser window (or in some cases it may even turn the URL address background green or light blue). Clicking the padlock icon will often reveal the site's security certificate (and allow you to read about the particular protection that this affords).
Now that a consumer knows that he or she is on a secure site, the next step is to ensure that the login process is secure. A good site will usually give a consumer two options-to pay instantly or as a guest, and to register on the site to use it again and save time on the next occasion the consumer uses it. As a guest, a web site will typically only ask for an email address and then ask a consumer how he or she would like to pay from the options they make available. This may mean entering debit or credit card details for example, which should then give a consumer the option to confirm the transaction (and then as a further security step run the transaction through 3D secure-a process used by major credit card companies as an added XML layer for online credit and debit card transactions. Visa call this process “Verified by Visa”, MasterCard call it “MasterCard SecureCode”, JCB International call it “J/Secure” and American Express call this “SafeKey”. Overall then, a well-constructed site will offer a safe payment system for consumers (and there are card and bank protections on fraud and low limitations on consumer liability in any case). Even so, consumers should also look for extra safety in specific statements on any given EBPP site about PCI compliance (or payment card industry standard adherence) and/or that credit/debit card data or numbers will not be stored or saved in any way (and if they are, that they will be fully encrypted and tokenised as a further protection against theft or fraud).
When registering (either before or after a bill had been viewed and paid) a well-designed and safe web sites will ask a consumer to set up a user name and password that he or she can remember and that identifies the consumer every time he or she uses the site in the future. The site may also ask for additional data such as email address, physical address, date of birth, driving license number or even passport number. In some cases, they may go yet further and ask security questions to help validate a consumer’s identity in the case of a future forgotten login ID or password. Although these may seem personal and even intrusive, these steps are all designed to protect consumer security and ensure that only one person is able to see the bills posted and to effect payment of any kind. In other words, this process allows the web site operator (financial institution or merchant) to know the customer (a process they call KYC) and protect everyone’s security to the best of their ability.
In general, research suggests that consumers worry most about using credit and debit cards on online sites of any kind. However, in the world of bill payment (as opposed to online shopping for example) these risks are not as great. Even a person with a stolen credit card number is highly unlikely to pay a bill for another person (assuming he or she had the bill details to enter) and even if they did, the risk would be with the merchant and not the consumer. So what about merchant side risk?
For a merchant, the greatest risk is charge-backs. This is where the credit or debit card holder disputes the transaction anywhere up to 6 months after the transaction date. Charge backs can either be because the card holder disputes that they made the transaction at all (i.e. it was a stolen or fraudulent), or because they did receive anything in return for the payment that was made. The second reason for chargebacks in the bill pay space is very rare, but the first reason-theft or fraud is obviously quite common (with total estimated costs of just under £1 billion in the UK in 2010). This is why online billpay web sites need to take so much care to ensure that card holders (who are not present as they are in a retail transaction) are who they say they are.
Summary
In the final analysis, for those EBPP sites that have a clear secure socket payment layer (SSL), have clear statements about security of information and sound compliance and a well-structured registration process, consumers face very low levels of risk (with a very low liability even when a rare problem may arise in any case). The merchant however, faces potentially much more risk arising from both debit and credit card fraud (and therefore possible charge-backs), but risk this can be mitigated with good consumer checking processes that are made easy for every customer to the site to use.
Monday, 14 November 2011
What will happen to bank fees in the future?
In my last blog article I stated that Merchant Banks are now making a large proportion of their profits by charging fees to both end consumers or account holders (although they worry about overdoing this to prevent customer “churn”) and to merchants who want to offer payment services to their customers. In the latter, I also suggested, there are many direct and indirect fees in the mix that need to be closely scrutinised. In this follow-on article I want to look take a more philosophical perspective and gaze into the crystal ball a little. I am therefore going to look at what the future might hold for merchant bank fees of all kinds.
The future of Direct Customer fees
Banks tend to charge transactional fees only when a customer has gone beyond what is deemed to be the core commercial relationship. Hence, fees are typically charged to customers when they have overdrawn an account, written a cheque in circumstances where they are insufficient funds to cover it, written a banker’s draft, made a wire transfer or carried out a foreign exchange transaction etc.
Although different banks are likely to try different approaches, most of them will want to move to a more transparent business model with customers. This will involve no fees whatsoever for customers that maintain a minimum positive balance and are willing to tie inward payments to their checking account (such as regular salary payments for example). It may also be that the bank will require some other accounts to be maintained to keep fees at zero (such as having a separate savings account or buying insurance through the bank etc). However, the model here will typically be not to charge fees for normal everyday transactions, and this will include items such as electronic bill pay, peer-to-peer payments online or via a smart phone app and even account balance enquiries online or at an ATM.
Of course, while this free service approach may work well for customers who can maintain a minimum float in a checking account (and also meet the other standards that may be required), many customers will not be able to do this and may actually pay more than they are charged today. As this encompasses many customers who are potentially still very valuable to a bank in the long term, another strategy here (and one that has been adopted already in several banks) is to charge a single standard account management fee (such as £20 or £30 per month perhaps-often also involving some rewards or loyalty benefits being offered too). This would either render all transactional fees at zero (or at least all but the ones that involve a customer going into debt).
Merchant fees
There has been much controversy about merchant bank fees in recent years. This controversy arises mainly from two factors: The first is the scale of these fees (both fixed and variable). And the second is the number of different fees that are levied (leading to much complexity and frustration on the part of a given merchant, much of the time). As we saw in the last article, there are often many separate charges rendered by merchant banks including: Cash processing fees, Cheque processing fees, Discount Fee Rates, Inter-change Transaction Fees, Address Verification Service (AVS) fees, Batch Fees, Monthly Statement or Customer Service Fees, Monthly Minimum Fees, Gateway Fees, Annual Fees, Chargeback/Retrieval Fees, and even Cancellation/ Termination Fees (not to mention other administrative fees relating to copy statements or reminder letters etc). The shear volumes of these different and often layered fees make not only for extra hidden costs but often considerable internal merchant time and effort to check that they are accurately applied.
While it is highly unlikely that merchant side fees will disappear completely, we are already seeing a shift to fees that fall into two categories. Those fees that are seen by a merchant as relatively arbitrary and unrelated to any real cost or contribution (let’s call them bank overhead recovery fees) and fees that are seen by a merchant to relate directly to a particular service or tangibly valuable outcome (let’s call them convenience fees). The future of these two fee categories will be very different.
Overhead Recovery Fees
Overhead recovery fees (rightly or wrongly in reality) are seen to be things like Discount fee rates, Bank Interchange rates, Gateway Fees, Batch Fees, Monthly minimum fees, Annual fees, Cancellation/Termination fees and any fees related to administration (such as charging for an email being sent) etc. What these fees have in common is that most merchants see these costs as having no direct benefit to their business or add little value as far as they are concerned. In fact, most merchants take the view that many of these tasks and processes have been automated or made very simple and cheap in the advent of modern software and/or Internet based technology, and yet fees have remained broadly the same or in some cases gone up. Debit cards in the US, provide a particular example where fees which often average 75 cents or higher were known to be costing a bank 70-80% less than this.
All Merchant banks will continue to compete aggressively with one another to win new customers or to retain existing ones, and price will be their primary tool. This is likely to drive these perceived to be low valued-added overhead recovery fees down strikingly in the next few years. Furthermore, as more and more mainly internet-based payment providers come to the market (with far less overhead to have to recover of course) there is every chance that all of these fees will evaporate completely-very good news for merchants of all sizes and types.
Convenience fees
Convenience fees (again rightly or wrongly in reality) are seen to be things like Cash and Cheque processing fees, Monthly Statement fees, Chargeback/ Retrieval fees etc. Not only do most merchants appreciate that these services have more easily seen effort and cost associated with rendering them but can more readily appreciate the value that they add to them. In other words, these activities would be as costly or even more expensive if they were to be performed by the merchants themselves or some other third-party organisation. In addition, these activities are perceived to add value in many cases by providing efficiency, or even a direct customer service benefit (which either increases satisfaction or can justify a particular pricing position on goods and services). You’ll notice that Address verification fees or Customer Service fees are not automatically listed here as convenience fees. These qualify to be included but merchant banks need to work hard to explain why and how this is the case (whether it is describing the benefit of having a real live person available in a call-centre to help with an unusual transactional event or bring about better credit card security by using look-up database services etc).
For all of these fees, if well-presented and explained, there is every opportunity to continue to charge for the service offered. However, the real opportunity here (to both retain fee income and then to grow it) lies in really getting alongside merchants in helping them to reduce their costs or to increase their revenue (in tangible ways). In this respect the opportunity is to help the merchant get bills/invoices seen more quickly and in digital form, to set up calendarised and recurrent type payments when they want them, the offer aggregate bulk payments (especially in the B2B space), to offering currency exchange service options, to offer greater payment type ubiquity and to offer better analysis and reporting on progressive transactional activity. In addition to this, merchant banks can offer modern internet-based technology to store invoice and payment data, offer alerts and reminders when wanted and even to provide links to better goods and services pricing and payment options in the future. Simply put, fee income in this convenience category can grow, and do so substantially, but only when there is a true partnership and the bank and merchant can both gain from the relationship in real and visible ways.
Summary
The merchant bank fee scene will change dramatically in the next few years. Overhead recovery type fees will reduce dramatically and ultimately disappear altogether in the competitive landscape ahead. However, convenience type fees, or those that can be seen by a merchant to add-value will continue to exist and can grow. This growth however, will be heavily dependent upon each bank’s ability to work in partnership with their merchants and offer technology and services that tangibly lead to lower costs or higher revenues. This will therefore be the big challenge for merchant banks in the next few years.
The future of Direct Customer fees
Banks tend to charge transactional fees only when a customer has gone beyond what is deemed to be the core commercial relationship. Hence, fees are typically charged to customers when they have overdrawn an account, written a cheque in circumstances where they are insufficient funds to cover it, written a banker’s draft, made a wire transfer or carried out a foreign exchange transaction etc.
Although different banks are likely to try different approaches, most of them will want to move to a more transparent business model with customers. This will involve no fees whatsoever for customers that maintain a minimum positive balance and are willing to tie inward payments to their checking account (such as regular salary payments for example). It may also be that the bank will require some other accounts to be maintained to keep fees at zero (such as having a separate savings account or buying insurance through the bank etc). However, the model here will typically be not to charge fees for normal everyday transactions, and this will include items such as electronic bill pay, peer-to-peer payments online or via a smart phone app and even account balance enquiries online or at an ATM.
Of course, while this free service approach may work well for customers who can maintain a minimum float in a checking account (and also meet the other standards that may be required), many customers will not be able to do this and may actually pay more than they are charged today. As this encompasses many customers who are potentially still very valuable to a bank in the long term, another strategy here (and one that has been adopted already in several banks) is to charge a single standard account management fee (such as £20 or £30 per month perhaps-often also involving some rewards or loyalty benefits being offered too). This would either render all transactional fees at zero (or at least all but the ones that involve a customer going into debt).
Merchant fees
There has been much controversy about merchant bank fees in recent years. This controversy arises mainly from two factors: The first is the scale of these fees (both fixed and variable). And the second is the number of different fees that are levied (leading to much complexity and frustration on the part of a given merchant, much of the time). As we saw in the last article, there are often many separate charges rendered by merchant banks including: Cash processing fees, Cheque processing fees, Discount Fee Rates, Inter-change Transaction Fees, Address Verification Service (AVS) fees, Batch Fees, Monthly Statement or Customer Service Fees, Monthly Minimum Fees, Gateway Fees, Annual Fees, Chargeback/Retrieval Fees, and even Cancellation/ Termination Fees (not to mention other administrative fees relating to copy statements or reminder letters etc). The shear volumes of these different and often layered fees make not only for extra hidden costs but often considerable internal merchant time and effort to check that they are accurately applied.
While it is highly unlikely that merchant side fees will disappear completely, we are already seeing a shift to fees that fall into two categories. Those fees that are seen by a merchant as relatively arbitrary and unrelated to any real cost or contribution (let’s call them bank overhead recovery fees) and fees that are seen by a merchant to relate directly to a particular service or tangibly valuable outcome (let’s call them convenience fees). The future of these two fee categories will be very different.
Overhead Recovery Fees
Overhead recovery fees (rightly or wrongly in reality) are seen to be things like Discount fee rates, Bank Interchange rates, Gateway Fees, Batch Fees, Monthly minimum fees, Annual fees, Cancellation/Termination fees and any fees related to administration (such as charging for an email being sent) etc. What these fees have in common is that most merchants see these costs as having no direct benefit to their business or add little value as far as they are concerned. In fact, most merchants take the view that many of these tasks and processes have been automated or made very simple and cheap in the advent of modern software and/or Internet based technology, and yet fees have remained broadly the same or in some cases gone up. Debit cards in the US, provide a particular example where fees which often average 75 cents or higher were known to be costing a bank 70-80% less than this.
All Merchant banks will continue to compete aggressively with one another to win new customers or to retain existing ones, and price will be their primary tool. This is likely to drive these perceived to be low valued-added overhead recovery fees down strikingly in the next few years. Furthermore, as more and more mainly internet-based payment providers come to the market (with far less overhead to have to recover of course) there is every chance that all of these fees will evaporate completely-very good news for merchants of all sizes and types.
Convenience fees
Convenience fees (again rightly or wrongly in reality) are seen to be things like Cash and Cheque processing fees, Monthly Statement fees, Chargeback/ Retrieval fees etc. Not only do most merchants appreciate that these services have more easily seen effort and cost associated with rendering them but can more readily appreciate the value that they add to them. In other words, these activities would be as costly or even more expensive if they were to be performed by the merchants themselves or some other third-party organisation. In addition, these activities are perceived to add value in many cases by providing efficiency, or even a direct customer service benefit (which either increases satisfaction or can justify a particular pricing position on goods and services). You’ll notice that Address verification fees or Customer Service fees are not automatically listed here as convenience fees. These qualify to be included but merchant banks need to work hard to explain why and how this is the case (whether it is describing the benefit of having a real live person available in a call-centre to help with an unusual transactional event or bring about better credit card security by using look-up database services etc).
For all of these fees, if well-presented and explained, there is every opportunity to continue to charge for the service offered. However, the real opportunity here (to both retain fee income and then to grow it) lies in really getting alongside merchants in helping them to reduce their costs or to increase their revenue (in tangible ways). In this respect the opportunity is to help the merchant get bills/invoices seen more quickly and in digital form, to set up calendarised and recurrent type payments when they want them, the offer aggregate bulk payments (especially in the B2B space), to offering currency exchange service options, to offer greater payment type ubiquity and to offer better analysis and reporting on progressive transactional activity. In addition to this, merchant banks can offer modern internet-based technology to store invoice and payment data, offer alerts and reminders when wanted and even to provide links to better goods and services pricing and payment options in the future. Simply put, fee income in this convenience category can grow, and do so substantially, but only when there is a true partnership and the bank and merchant can both gain from the relationship in real and visible ways.
Summary
The merchant bank fee scene will change dramatically in the next few years. Overhead recovery type fees will reduce dramatically and ultimately disappear altogether in the competitive landscape ahead. However, convenience type fees, or those that can be seen by a merchant to add-value will continue to exist and can grow. This growth however, will be heavily dependent upon each bank’s ability to work in partnership with their merchants and offer technology and services that tangibly lead to lower costs or higher revenues. This will therefore be the big challenge for merchant banks in the next few years.
Thursday, 9 June 2011
Why do all businesses need a Merchant Account and what is the best way to go about getting one?
Traditionally, to be afforded the opportunity to accept credit and debit cards from their customers any organisation (typically called a “merchant” by the financial services industry) must be granted so-called “proper” status as a bank. This proper status is given to a merchant through the vehicle of a unique Merchant ID (or MID) from the bank and allows them to participate in the payments chain. Pretty much all large businesses have a merchant account like this. However, the smaller the organisation gets, the less likely that they will have one and may be missing out on the benefits.
The banks which provide a merchant account are not quite the same as the ones with which we are most familiar as personal current account holders. All major high street banks have what is known as an “acquiring” bank arm or division. For example, in the UK NatWest has 'Streamline', Lloyds-TSB has 'Cardnet', HSBC has 'HSBC Merchant Services' and so on. In addition, some organisations outside the high streets banks (like American Express and PayPal for instance) have a license and do their own acquiring. Subject to a range of pre-conditions, all these “acquiring banks” issue a Merchant ID and allow an organisation of any sort to start taking credit and debit cards. They will then approve or decline each customer transaction made, collect any payments on the merchant’s behalf and pay the money into a merchant’s nominated bank account.
There are clearly costs involved in setting up this merchant account - in most circumstances the acquiring bank will include setup charges, monthly or annual fees, monthly rental of a physical terminal (or PDQ machine) for the merchant to process card details, and they may require a merchant to pay for a dedicated telephone line for the terminal. A merchant will also be charged a percentage of each transaction which they process, may have a minimum monthly volume of business imposed, and in some cases, have to provide a substantial “bond” or deposit as additional security (to cover any potential card “charge-backs” that may occur).
Sadly perhaps, that's the relatively easy part of the process! - before a merchant can even start the process, they will have to convince the acquiring bank that they are worthy of their trust, and a merchant will usually have to provide two years audited accounts and demonstrate a sound business track record in order for the application to proceed (which is why some banks also require a cash bond and an full business plan if a merchant cannot satisfy all that, for whatever reason).
Even if a merchant meets these requirements, they will usually only be able to accept card payments in the “traditional” part of the business only. If a merchant wants to set up a web site to accept card payments they will find that the acquiring banks will not accept any information coming from the merchant directly via the Internet. The banks will only accept information from a web site which has been processed by an approved Payment Service Provider or PSP (who will do this on a bulk basis and in a safe and secure way –and according to PCI or Payment Card Industry compliance rules).
A Payment Service Provider’s function is to integrate a merchant’s e-commerce enabled web site with the major credit card networks so that orders generated by a merchant’s own or chosen 'shopping cart' software can be authorised and payment collected. This payment is then transferred to a merchant’s account for onward remittance to another receiving bank account as necessary.
As you might expect every merchant has to go through quite a formal application process in order to get an agreement in place with a PSP. Their terms and conditions and charges vary enormously from one PSP to another and it is very difficult to make exact comparisons. Merchants also need to be aware that whatever charges any PSP makes will always be added to those charges which are levied by the acquiring bank providing the Merchant Account. This means any merchant may well end up paying two lots of set-up charges, monthly/annual fees, and, worst of all, two lots of percentages (plus fixed fees in some cases) on every transaction.
So, you might be thinking, with all of these hurdles:
1. why would a small organisation in particular bother with all of this? and
2. are there better ways to go about the necessary merchant account sign up steps if the journey to doing so is deemed to be worthwhile?
The answer to the first question is relatively straightforward. For most businesses turning over say more than £100,000 a year, the ability to offer credit and debit cards payments will bring not only extra revenue but will also accelerate cash-flow (to some extent at least). This will usually easily recover the outlay made on setting up a merchant account and make incremental profit into the bargain. Fixed fee payback would be expected to be within the first 6-9 months and thereafter the benefits would typically be significant for most businesses.
The answer to the second question is also a positive one. As the Internet (and web 2.0 technology in particular) has evolved in recent years, there are now several businesses that a merchant can approach to be a “one-stop-shop” when it comes to taking payments (credit, debit and even other types). In other words, these businesses will handle all of your merchant needs, including setting up the necessary relationship with both the bank (the acquirer) and the processor (the PSP) and may offer other services also. At a simple level this is likely to be more flexible customer service (a single point of contact with a real person for example) but may include other services (such as e-wallet capability-such as PayPal offers for instance or electronic billing capability-such as PaySwyft offers for instance). In addition these “one-stop-shop” businesses can often lower overall costs and reduce administrative hassle as well as operate on a “pay-as-you-go” basis. This means that even small merchants can accept credit and debit cards quickly and cost effectively and start to reap the benefits that have mainly only been available to the larger organisations in the past.
Useful additional information on this subject can be found on many websites. One of these is www.web-merchant.com (see www.web-merchant.co.uk/howdoesitwork.asp ) from which some of the above material was drawn.
The banks which provide a merchant account are not quite the same as the ones with which we are most familiar as personal current account holders. All major high street banks have what is known as an “acquiring” bank arm or division. For example, in the UK NatWest has 'Streamline', Lloyds-TSB has 'Cardnet', HSBC has 'HSBC Merchant Services' and so on. In addition, some organisations outside the high streets banks (like American Express and PayPal for instance) have a license and do their own acquiring. Subject to a range of pre-conditions, all these “acquiring banks” issue a Merchant ID and allow an organisation of any sort to start taking credit and debit cards. They will then approve or decline each customer transaction made, collect any payments on the merchant’s behalf and pay the money into a merchant’s nominated bank account.
There are clearly costs involved in setting up this merchant account - in most circumstances the acquiring bank will include setup charges, monthly or annual fees, monthly rental of a physical terminal (or PDQ machine) for the merchant to process card details, and they may require a merchant to pay for a dedicated telephone line for the terminal. A merchant will also be charged a percentage of each transaction which they process, may have a minimum monthly volume of business imposed, and in some cases, have to provide a substantial “bond” or deposit as additional security (to cover any potential card “charge-backs” that may occur).
Sadly perhaps, that's the relatively easy part of the process! - before a merchant can even start the process, they will have to convince the acquiring bank that they are worthy of their trust, and a merchant will usually have to provide two years audited accounts and demonstrate a sound business track record in order for the application to proceed (which is why some banks also require a cash bond and an full business plan if a merchant cannot satisfy all that, for whatever reason).
Even if a merchant meets these requirements, they will usually only be able to accept card payments in the “traditional” part of the business only. If a merchant wants to set up a web site to accept card payments they will find that the acquiring banks will not accept any information coming from the merchant directly via the Internet. The banks will only accept information from a web site which has been processed by an approved Payment Service Provider or PSP (who will do this on a bulk basis and in a safe and secure way –and according to PCI or Payment Card Industry compliance rules).
A Payment Service Provider’s function is to integrate a merchant’s e-commerce enabled web site with the major credit card networks so that orders generated by a merchant’s own or chosen 'shopping cart' software can be authorised and payment collected. This payment is then transferred to a merchant’s account for onward remittance to another receiving bank account as necessary.
As you might expect every merchant has to go through quite a formal application process in order to get an agreement in place with a PSP. Their terms and conditions and charges vary enormously from one PSP to another and it is very difficult to make exact comparisons. Merchants also need to be aware that whatever charges any PSP makes will always be added to those charges which are levied by the acquiring bank providing the Merchant Account. This means any merchant may well end up paying two lots of set-up charges, monthly/annual fees, and, worst of all, two lots of percentages (plus fixed fees in some cases) on every transaction.
So, you might be thinking, with all of these hurdles:
1. why would a small organisation in particular bother with all of this? and
2. are there better ways to go about the necessary merchant account sign up steps if the journey to doing so is deemed to be worthwhile?
The answer to the first question is relatively straightforward. For most businesses turning over say more than £100,000 a year, the ability to offer credit and debit cards payments will bring not only extra revenue but will also accelerate cash-flow (to some extent at least). This will usually easily recover the outlay made on setting up a merchant account and make incremental profit into the bargain. Fixed fee payback would be expected to be within the first 6-9 months and thereafter the benefits would typically be significant for most businesses.
The answer to the second question is also a positive one. As the Internet (and web 2.0 technology in particular) has evolved in recent years, there are now several businesses that a merchant can approach to be a “one-stop-shop” when it comes to taking payments (credit, debit and even other types). In other words, these businesses will handle all of your merchant needs, including setting up the necessary relationship with both the bank (the acquirer) and the processor (the PSP) and may offer other services also. At a simple level this is likely to be more flexible customer service (a single point of contact with a real person for example) but may include other services (such as e-wallet capability-such as PayPal offers for instance or electronic billing capability-such as PaySwyft offers for instance). In addition these “one-stop-shop” businesses can often lower overall costs and reduce administrative hassle as well as operate on a “pay-as-you-go” basis. This means that even small merchants can accept credit and debit cards quickly and cost effectively and start to reap the benefits that have mainly only been available to the larger organisations in the past.
Useful additional information on this subject can be found on many websites. One of these is www.web-merchant.com (see www.web-merchant.co.uk/howdoesitwork.asp ) from which some of the above material was drawn.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)