Is online Direct Debit a “Win-Win” for Everyone?

 

Direct Debit or Direct deposit as it is called in some countries has been around for decades now and making steady inroads as a payment method offered these days by many large merchants, often with incentives (such as vouchers or money off a bill) to customers to sign a direct debit mandate. Merchants who are part of the Direct Debit scheme (called Originators) claim that the service not only saves time and hassle for customers in general, but also that it facilitates easier scheduling, easier storage, is more secure, involves less cheques and reduces errors. Of course, both the merchants and the banks also gain these same benefits, not to mention the capacity to reach into a customer’s bank account directly to collect payment for a bill (something that a customer is not always completely happy about).

  

Despite its steady progress, Direct Debit’s growth has slowed until very recently, when on-line billing and/or payment portals have come into being and offered to speed up quite an old-fashioned process, in which a paper-based form still had to be sent in and signed before service could commence (and the whole process repeated when a direct debit amount changed). These new portals (such as the one at www.Payswyft.com as an example) not only offer traditional benefits to consumers (shown in the table below to the right-the top 4) but adds new customer benefits that are only possible online (shown in the 5 blue italics items in the right column below). The online portal therefore gives consumers even more reason to either use direct debit some of the time or use it as their primary payment channel.

  

Banks

• Saves data entry staff time
• Opens up new markets
• Reduces float costs/ Accelerates cash-flow
• Faster settlement
• Better merchant and customer retention
• Low per transaction costs

Originators

• Retains customers for longer
• Reduces float costs/ Accelerates cash-flow
• More payments on time
• Interchange fee savings
• Adds payment type flexibility
• Can tie to credit card

 

Consumers

• Lower chequing account fees
• Less hassle in writing cheques, stuffing envelopes and mailing
• Builds better credit history
• Helps avoid bill late fees
• Simple to use Alerts
• Less paper
• Easy cancellation
• Easy registration/set-up
• Can tie to credit card

Banks and Originators win too

It’s always critical for a customer to gain substantive advantage with a payment service of any kind but it is even better if the service provider can win at the same time. In the two columns to the left above are therefore the advantages gained by both the banks and the originators/merchants by pushing direct debit as a payment option. For the banks the primary advantage is that online direct debit payments reduce data entry time and staff, but not far behind is the new revenue possibility of opening up new markets (e.g. smaller merchants being introduced to the scheme). For the originators the primary advantage is that it helps to retain customers, who typically like all their payment history to be available at the portal. Just as important though is the cash-flow benefit. Direct debit payers almost always pay on time (and many pay early). No more cheques in the mail on the last possible day.

  

Summary

Direct debit is not a new service but online billing and/or payment portals such as PaySwyft offer even more reasons for everyone to gain the benefit of using this payment channel.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Using a Range of more “Active” Incentives to adopt e-billing and payment

With a planned and consistent information-led approach which stresses the many benefits of the transition, as much as 15% of a customer base may adopt your new electronic billing and payment system. This information-led approach is like to use a range of gentle encouragement approaches such as:

1. Letters explaining the new system
2. Short notices about particular benefits
3. FAQ’s on a merchant website explaining the new system
4. Pamphlets/Leaflets/Brochures on the new system
5. White papers (on benefits such as being more “green”)
6. Trials (try using the system but keeping getting paper bills)
7. Offers such as planting a tree (for every 10 customers who switch to e-billing)

However, to get the majority of customers to alter old habits, greater incentives are needed and this will depend on each merchant deciding how much extra pressure to change to apply. This falls into two categories-what we call “active encouragement” and “aggressive encouragement”. Let’s look at each of these in turn.

Active encouragement

Active encouragement uses a range of methods to incent customers to switch but all of these fall short of forcing them to change or imposing new costs on them. Examples here include:

1. Offering donations to charity (for each customer/every 5 customers who switch)
2. Using email campaigns to use e-billing
3. Engaging in planned text messaging campaigns to explain the benefits
4. Educating customers over the phone (via a call-center) on a push basis
5. Running advertisements (print, radio and even cable)
6. Running sweepstakes or other competitions around the new e-billing system
7. Using on-hold messaging to encourage adoption

If gentle encouragement achieves the first 15% to adopt e-billing, the above may add another 25% over a 3-6 month period (with consistent effort).

 

Aggressive encouragement

Give that the first two encouragement approaches described above may convert 40% of the customer base to the new billing system on a combined basis, the last 60% may need to be pushed even harder and this is what we call “aggressive encouragement”. Examples of this might be:

1. Running a loyalty points scheme for prizes (in-house or third-party) for switching customers
2. Offering coupons or discounts for products or services (in-house or external) when switching
3. Offering third-party gift certificates for adoption
4. Forcing customers to opt-out of electronic billing (simply by turning off paper bills for example)
5. Offering discounts on bills viewed and paid electronically  (e.g.1%, 2% or even more off)
6. Charging customers if they want a printed invoice
7. Charging customers a surcharge to call in make to a call center

These more aggressive encouragement approaches need to be carefully discussed before implementation and will also depend on the new system being offered. In the case of using a service such as BillSwyft for example, customers can still print invoices and generate PDF’s, thereby making the switch to no paper rather easier to bear.

Moving Customers from the Paper-based World of Bills and Checks into the Digital age?

To encourage customer to adopt an online billing solution of any kind takes careful planning and creativity and there are several “angles” a biller can take in the general promotion of the benefits of the change to e-billing. A few of these are:

1.          The Informational Angle – simply communicating that the new system is available and is easy and quick to use and should be tried –the more you can get the pioneer and early adopter types to make the switch the better-some of these may even provide testimonials to be published on a web site to the rest of the customer base.

2.          The Green Angle – The fact that the new bill presentment and payment system can save paper (and even save water, electricity and fuel) is a powerful reason for many customers to “do their bit” and make own small contribution to the sustainability of the planet.

3.          The Benefits Angle – In the early stages, customers will not be interested long communications about features of a new system (and may even resist any proposed change). However, by focusing on the specific benefits of the new system (such as speed and convenience, or the capacity to save them time and money in an increasingly busy world) this is often more than enough to get them thinking about making the change.

4.          The Rewards Angle – Merchants can offer specific rewards and incentives (points, gifts and prizes etc.) to customers to get them to switch to an electronic billing and payment solution.   

In some cases, a merchant will want to adopt just one of these angles to get customers to start thinking about using an online bill view and payment solution, but it may also be useful to adopt more than one angle or even switch from one to another progressively over time and therefore use all four of the above options. Of course, for the bulk of customers you may need to use the rewards angle (and actively or even aggressively) to get them to take action.

Electronic billing and payment-a win-win for everyone?

Electronic billing and payment is one of those rare organizational change measures that can create a number of so-called win-wins. The merchant wins on efficiency and effectiveness (and with the right solution on the cost side too) and the customer wins on speed and convenience (and can save a little money as well). Let’s briefly look at why.

For the merchant on the direct or visible cost side, there’s less paper, less envelopes, less ink and less postage when customers elect to discontinue getting a paper invoice. Even though these are often significant in and of themselves there are also even bigger potential cost reductions on the indirect or more hidden side of things...less customer support (handling queries or phone-in payments) and much less time spent on reconciliation and settlement. In addition, online bill presentment and payment has been shown to lead to much quicker settlement by the customer-which substantially aids cash-flow for a merchant. All these savings add up significantly on the merchant side.

For the customer they win by eliminating or simplifying the tasks of organizing bills, querying them, and storing them (in a good online system forever) and being able to make payments in many ways (all being possible both safely and securely and at a single web site, and ideally only with a few clicks). Digitally-based billing and payment means more free time for the bill payer, and less to worry about when dealing with paper (including having to put the bill or invoice somewhere safe, finding it when needed and even losing it occasionally).

And above and beyond the merchant and the customer in the relationship, the environment wins too.  Electronic billing is a simple but significant step that every organization can take with a little focus, effort and determination, and encourage their customers to make a small “green” contribution of their own.  Less paper eventually means less use of trees and less transportation (and gas), reducing a merchant’s carbon footprint. Not all customers will be happy to turn off paper immediately but some will and they will slowly encourage the others to do the same.

So, in summary merchants will save money on:

•                  Printing paper bills

•                  Fulfillment and postage

•                  Undeliverable mail

•                  Chasing as many late payments

•                  Handling manual payments

•                  Archiving paper bills

•                  Reconciliation/bill matching/banking payments

And customers will save time on:

•                  Checking and paying bills

•                  Hunting for previous bills

•                  Checking funds and means to pay

•                  Writing and mailing checks

•                  Waiting for a merchant to be open for business

•                  Paying by IVR or phone

•                  Worrying over lost checks and late delivery

And all this is “green” too.

The factors that help shape choice in the online payment world

There are now many payments types or channels available to both merchants and customers (cash, cheque, credit card, debit card, pre-paid card, direct debit, Internet direct bank transfer, e-wallet transfer etc.). However, they all present different advantages and disadvantages, and these may be quite different for a consumer versus a merchant. However, by drawing together a range of international literature about payment systems and how they are used by people and organizations of all kinds, six attributes of payment products appear to be most relevant to the choices that are made of both merchants and their customers alike*. These six factors are:
capability

• cost
• convenience
• coverage
• confidence and
• confidentiality

Let’s look at each of these in a little more detail.

Capability

Capability refers to the functional ability to actually use a particular payment type or channel. For example, capability in cash transactions (the oldest and most ubiquitous of payment types) relates to a person or an organization being in a position to hand over a payment (having cash in an acceptable denomination/currency) and then receive the payment (also in an acceptable denomination/currency of course). This becomes a threshold issue in non-cash payments, which often involve technical issues such as the establishment of a means of communicating over distance, ability to verify the parties in a payment transaction, and many other factors.

Cost

All payment systems involve some costs (including cash). Both consumers and merchants are likely to seek to use lower cost payments if they can. This is especially the case if they can readily know what the use of each payment will cost them (sometimes this is transparent and sometimes it is not of course). The cost of a payment is not always spread evenly between the parties. Vendors of payment products will often seek to make some approaches appear to be no-cost or low-cost to the customer-but this may or may not be true. The cost structures of payment methods also differ; some have a fixed transaction charge while others are proportional to the size of the transaction.

Convenience

Convenience refers to the ease of use or “user-friendliness” of a payment method. A need for registration before using the payment method, or the speed of payment (for example, the time taken to approve a payment) can be factors affecting convenience. Consumers generally view cash as convenient to carry for small purchases at the point-of-sale. This means that to be competitive with cash, electronic payments systems have to offer a high level of convenience (hence all the current interest in mobile phone usage for payments). Businesses however typically have a very different perspective on convenience to that of consumers. They are likely to seek payment products and services that fit reasonably well into their broader processes and systems.

Coverage

Coverage refers to how widely a payment method or system is accepted by merchants and other recipients of payments, such as businesses receiving payments from suppliers. An important objective for all payment types and channels is therefore clearly to be widely accessible to merchants, traders, consumers and other users without high-entry or ongoing costs. Similarly, consumers should encounter as few barriers as possible in undertaking transactions using the chosen system.

Confidence

This refers to a customer’s belief that a payment will be successfully executed and completed, and that the value of a payment method will be respected. Confidence rises where arrangements are secure and value does not ‘leak’. The confidence that consumers have in a payment method also depends on the associated payment channel. For example, online payments with credit cards differ from offline payments, in that the card is not physically provided by the customer and the merchant does not obtain a signed confirmation from the customer. Some card schemes provide a system of cardholder authentication, usually through provision of name, credit card number and expiration date. To prevent illegitimate interception, this information is typically encrypted so as to increase levels of confidence in the payment system. 

Confidentiality

As a payment type only cash maintains payer and/or payee confidentiality. Non-cash payments often involve the collection of information that becomes valuable. Users of payment systems are often concerned about the collection and use of this often personal information, and its potential release to other parties, if not properly secured. For example, in general, credit card payments are made via an identifiable account, resulting in the loss of anonymity. This means that some individuals are uncomfortable or unhappy about using payment types or channels which cannot reasonably protect their personal information (and may increase the risk of theft or fraud).

Summary

Payment type or channel choices are complex for both a given consumer or merchant. However, in this article we have described six factors which seem to be most influential in the decision-making process. Although these factors all stand alone, they are not necessarily independent of one another of course. In other words, the boundaries between factors are often blurred of “fuzzy”.

In addition, it is also worth noting that any one of these factors can be primary, depending on a given individual or organizational perspective. For some consumers and/or merchants therefore, cost and convenience may be first and second (with other factors making little difference). However, for other consumers and/or merchants, capability, coverage and confidentiality may all have equal significance, for instance.

*The report by the Australian Government called “Exploration of future Electronic Payments” was extremely useful in assembling and describing the factors in more detail.

Ten ways to accelerate cash flow

In today’s tough economic climate all businesses need to pay even more close attention to ensure that cash due from customers flows in as quickly and smoothly as possible. What follows is ten key ways that cash-flow can be accelerated:

1. Send invoice as soon as possible after a product is supplied or a service is rendered, because every day you are late is at least one more day your customer will wait to pay-terms only start once they receive your bill. If it takes a week to get the bills out, on average, that’s a week’s worth of cash-flow. Also, follow up on major invoices to ensure the client has received the invoice. Invoices can often be delayed by an internal authorisation process, or just going astray.

2. Clear and professional looking invoices get taken more seriously. Make sure that they therefore contain all the information such as the correct entity name, right address etc with clear ways to pay listed.

3. Set fair and appropriate credit terms and communicate these clearly with a ‘due date’ very visible on the invoice. You may even want to set the payment expectations of new customers with a specific welcome letter.

4. Deposit all payments made immediately (especially when these are cheques or cash). The more these can get into a bank account quickly the better.

5. Offer several payment methods not just one or two -customers should never have an excuse for late payment related to your lack of convenient payment options-all customers today (small and large) need to be given choices.

6. Offer early payment discounts so long as it doesn’t swallow up all the profit. If customers are struggling, the sooner you provide the facility to partially pay, the sooner the debt is paid. If a customer exceeds their terms, you can offer cash on delivery terms until the account is back on track.

7. In order to remind customers when to pay, you need a system to let you know when they are due. A series of email/SMS messages, depending upon the time overdue with relevant wording, is often very useful.

8. A great target or key performance indicator for accounts receivables is ‘accounts receivable days’. This is not to be confused with the terms you offer customers. The ‘accounts receivable days’ is the average number of days that all customers are taking to pay you. Of course you want this to be on terms or better.

9. Use you improved cash flow practices to reduce your overdraft or “float” thus saving interest costs or giving you extra cash to spend elsewhere.

10. Aim to do as much of the above as possible online at a flexible and versatile bill presentment and payment web site (such as payswyft.com). Not only will clearly presented electronic bills arrive much quicker but research suggests that customers pay 35% quicker when they receive an online bill and can pay it online on the same web site. Sites like PaySwyft also automatically bundle many of the above steps in the technology or give an organisation a range of options to help accelerate cash-flow.

Ultimately, if you can entrench these steps into your payment strategy and operational practices you will find accounts receivables less of a hassle, resulting in greatly improved cash-flow for your business.

Can Better Billing Practices Improve Merchant Cash-flow, Cost Effectiveness and Customer Satisfaction?

Or why does efficient and effective billing practices deliver greater Cash-flow, Cost effectiveness and Customer Satisfaction for the merchant and more Convenience, Clarity/Certainty and Choice for the consumer-the 6 C’s

Billing is never the most exciting of subjects for business owners or managers, coming as it does as the last and perhaps most administrative or clerical step in the sales to delivery cycle. However, being a last step should not relegate it to being the least important and there is actually plenty of evidence to suggest that efficient billing practices may be one of the most critical. In this article we will therefore briefly explore why better billing practices can have a significant impact on cash-flow, cost-effectiveness and customer satisfaction for the merchant (as well as several equally beneficial, and linked outcomes for their customers).

Before we look at each of these 3 merchant benefits in turn, let’s define what we mean by “efficient billing practices”. Presenting a bill or invoice can clearly be done in person (albeit rarely), in the physical mail (with a stamp), via an email (typically with a PDF attachment) or by digital means (via an Internet web site). All four of these options can be relatively “efficient” if they reach the right person quickly and facilitate the earliest possible settlement. However, experience (and much research) tells us that these practices are likely to be progressively more effective in the order in which they are listed. In other words, a full digital presentment of the bill is likely to be a much better option that delivering a bill by email, which in turn is better than doing so by physical mail etc. In this article we will therefore assume that a merchant will have, or aspire to have, the most efficient and effective approach –a full digital e-bill and it will be our contention that getting this bill delivered allows all the benefits we will elaborate upon subsequently to follow. The diagram below illustrates this rather more visually.

 

© PaySwyft, 2011. All Rights Reserved

Greater Cash-flow

The vast majority of organisations that supply a product or render a service to another organisation, or an end consumer, usually do so on credit terms (a lucky few get paid ahead of time of course). To operate somewhat like a lending bank, an organisation must therefore use shareholder funds, cash in its bank account,  supplier credit (if they have any) or other money that is borrowed in some way (with interest being payable). These credit terms, or what is sometimes easier to visualise as the time taken to receive payment from customers, can have a huge impact on the working capital needed by a business and thereby have a critical affect on cash-flow. From the point of the delivery, spending days preparing and sending an invoice along with offering normal credit terms for a given industry (say 30 day terms on average), might mean that a particular enterprise may have an average days outstanding in practice of 40-45 days to get paid. Even for a relatively small business turning over say £500,000 a year this would mean working capital of £30,000 needs to be maintained just to stay in business (or in this case 6% of turnover).

Given the above, if a merchant takes its billing practices seriously, it should present an invoice to the customer in the fastest way possible (ideally digitally, the day after delivery-or even the same day perhaps). In addition, with a full digital bill, an opportunity can be offered to check that the bill has all the information that the customer needs to see and in as much detail and as they need to see it. This creates clarity and certainty that they are paying appropriately for what they have received. On a digitally presented bill, “clickable” payment options can allow the customer to render payment immediately (at the same web site and in the same session) or perhaps schedule a payment there and then (especially if there are multiple payment choices available, which we will look at later). All of this combines to ensure that invoice days outstanding are reduced, in some cases by up to 30-40%. This clearly has a very positive impact on cash-flow and allows working capital to be reduced or freed up for other uses (in the above small business example it could lead to 2-3% of total revenue in savings).

Greater Cost Effectiveness

It is estimated that physical bills (paper-base ones) still account for around 80% of the total volume of bills in all major economies, where there is good data to measure it such as the UK, Australia, Canada, France, Holland, Germany, New Zealand, Singapore, Sweden, and the US (amongst others).

The direct costs of preparing an invoice and sending it in the mail alone are relatively high, especially in an age when we can send almost any document electronically. However, they are even higher when you factor in the indirect costs associated with the potential for keying errors, mis-delivery and loss and the extra time often needed for accounting and reconciliation (to name but a few problems). The email based bill (now accounting for around 15% of the total volume of bills according to most research) removes some of the direct costs above, but almost none of the indirect costs of keying errors and mis-delivery, and extra time needed for accounting and reconciliation. The full digital bill is the only option therefore which has the scope to make a large dent in both direct and indirect costs.

With a well-designed system, a fully digital billing approach allows the customer to see the full bill immediately it is delivered (24/7 and 365 days a year) to analyse it versus other bills from the same merchant potentially and to immediately effect payment (or plan for it to occur on the system). This therefore affords much greater customer convenience (especially when they can use the system for their own personal bill storage and not have to wait for a merchant call-centre to be open to take a payment, for instance). However, the major benefits to the merchant are in having a full electronic record of each transaction (individually or in aggregate), with as much detail as they wish to see. And by maintaining the whole billing process in electronic form, all the data can flow in digital form in all directions, including reconciliation in the accounting system-thereby saving many labour hours and costs.

Greater Customer Satisfaction

When customers are asked about their overall experiences of organisational billing (in general) they will tend to mention three factors more than any other.

The first is that it should offer “clarity and certainty”. By this they typically mean that it should be a clear and easy to follow invoice, be accurate, be securely delivered to them and reflect what they have purchased in a certain way.

Secondly, they will typically say that a bill should be “conveniently” presented.  Mailing it may meet this need (physically or by email) but digitally allows it to be viewed at any time day and night and, if it is user-friendly enough, can allow for further detail to be scrutinised, when desired.

Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, customers will nominate the need for “choice” to be available to them. On the presentment side this may be whether to pay the bill now or later or to set up a scheduled or recurrent payment (with associated electronic alerts and reminders to an email account of mobile phone, as needed). On the payment side, this may be to have lots of immediate and widespread payment types or options to be used on both the debit and credit side if possible. In a well-designed digital billing web site, all of this can be available with an even greater range of choices being available in terms of individual customer preferences, in many cases.

Summary

In conclusion then it should by now be clear that the apparently basic and administrative item of a simple bill to a customer can be presented in a way that can have a significant bearing on Cash-flow, Cost Control and Customer Satisfaction. A well-designed and fully electronic or digital billing process will typically give the best results and all organisations should therefore consider moving to such a system as quickly as possible, especially if they can add it as an additional channel to existing practices (minimising disruption) and on a pay-as-you-go basis (as offered by systems such as PaySwyft for example).

 

 

 

Will Mobile Phones Become the Dominant Channel for Bill Delivery?

There are now a multitude of channels available to customers to pay their bills. These channels include:

1. Print and mail (paper-based)
2. Fax
3. Email with embedded data
4. Data interchange (system-to-system)
5. Email with PDF and/or link to on-line
6. Customer Web Portal
7. Mobile (MMS; HTML; WAP; USSD)
8. Mobile via App
9. Mobile Tablet
10. Emergent technology (via cable TV etc)

Only print and mail on the above list existed as an option until around 30 years ago when fax arrived and 25 years ago when email came along (both of which still have quite a strong following today). Data interchange options were mainly evolved and used in the B2B rather than direct Business to customer or B2C space but again are still around today as a strong channel, supported in the main by large international software companies, who have sufficiently large installed volumes to want to protect their position in the billing market.

Web based technology has driven the greatest change in the billing space in the last 10 years or so and seen the emergence of both consumer and merchant portals (for presentment and payment) and the use of mobile technology as 3G and 4G have made the internet available to mobile phones.

Even though each of these channels presents a new and perhaps better and more convenient choice to a given customer (and are often presented as the channel to replace earlier channel choices) in reality, they are often just additional options. In other words, consumers have shown time and time again that they like the extra choice but do not necessarily want to be driven too quickly to only one channel (however “efficient and effective” it is presented to be).

The implication of customers wanting lots of channel choice to both view and pay their bills is that the same bill may need to be presented and rendered possible to pay in several channels, at least for now.

 
Today’s challenges
Some technology experts are starting to say that customers will be move rapidly away from e-billing to m-billing (m for mobile of course) in the next few years. Modern mobiles can certainly handle very complex tasks today - just look at the hundred of thousands of Apps available for all different platforms. These Apps can do complex tasks, even generating bills “on-the-fly”. A mobile can also handle a simple task such as bill presentment with ease today – in some cases on quite a detailed basis (even though reading it may present quite a challenge!). However, viewing a PDF bill attachment on a mobile (as opposed to a tablet) is often a long scrolling exercise, making it impractical in most cases. There is a solution to this but it needs the biller to solve the problem of displaying their bills in more flexible ways according to the kind of mobile platform to which it is being delivered. In this way, a customer can see a simple version of the way and then “drill into the detail” as they wish when they want to see itemization. 

However, perhaps all of this is a false dilemma. In the final analysis, customers do not care if a bill is delivered to their computer, their tablet or their mobile (or even all three). In fact, many want to see it delivered in as many ways as possible to allow maximum flexibility, including by email or by PDF attachment and even in the physical mail or fax on some occasions. This multi-channel approach is therefore a customer centric approach. The challenge for billers then is how to provide as many of these channels as possible at the lowest cost possible. In the end there is only one solution to this –use a full digital bill presentment and payment portal, such as PaySwyft for example. This not only means that a bill can be sent in all 9 of the current channels above (and can be paid at the same portal) but means that a biller would be well-placed to take advantage of the new emergent technologies that will come along as in the near future.

Embracing E-Invoicing -The Barriers vs. Benefits

Two recent surveys (one in the US and one in Europe) have confirmed that 20% of survey  population respondents (on average) were already using a form of e-invoicing, with a further 50% actively evaluating adopting it in the near future.

These two surveys ultimately conclude that the benefits of embracing e-invoicing outweigh the barriers, for most organizations, but suggest that particular barriers will inhibit the time taken to adopt the technology or the time taken for it to become fully utilized. Let’s therefore look at these barriers and benefits in more detail:

The Barriers

The greatest perceived barriers to adopting e-invoicing is current work processes or existing process design around issuing an invoice and getting paid (and the inability to change these processes quickly or effectively). Close behind is the lack of budget to develop or purchase new e-invoicing software, or pay any incremental, up-front costs, even if this led to significant medium to long-term savings. A lack of executive sponsorship is also cited as a commonplace barrier, with the CEO or CFO most commonly expected to be a major driver of adoption in most cases.

Other commonly cited barriers are having insufficient resources to bring in a new approach (mainly people) and the associated lack of time and resources to integrate e-invoicing with current systems or software (especially on the accounting side of things). In addition, lack of awareness about available forward options and possible supplier resistance were also cited as being significant factors.

The Benefits

The greatest perceived benefits to adopting e-invoicing is its capacity to better control the whole billing process much more effectively (at every level and from bill or invoice issue to ultimate payment). This includes the capacity to ensure that invoices were less frequently lost, missing or duplicated. E-invoicing is also expected to reduce billing and payment processing costs significantly and also to decrease payment cycle times. The capacity to also dramatically reduce errors and exceptions is also seen as a significant benefit.

Another major cited benefit of e-invoicing is the capacity for e-invoicing to increase on-time payments (and even accelerate cash-flow) and to increase choice when it comes to invoice payment options and potentially when an invoice can be paid.

What does this mean to those organizations thinking about e-invoicing?

Any organization interested in saving expenses and accelerating cash-flow would be wise to research the e-invoicing options available to them (of which there are several, including cloud-based and “pay-as-you-go” systems (which avoid capital outlays and long integration effort) such as Payswyft, which immediately solve other barriers such as lack of budget and resources and the need for integration time and effort. In addition, the CEO or CFO of an enterprise should ideally act as a project champion, helping his or her organization to evaluate specific options and how particular barriers need to be overcome. In taking these two steps alone, most organizations would smooth the path to embracing e-invoicing and be able to realize the substantial benefits much more quickly (in terms of lowering their own costs and giving their customers a much better payment experience).

Optimizing the Customer Experience when paying online

Any business, no matter what size or type, needs to pay careful attention to the customer experience when they are asking individuals to visit their web site and pay online (whatever products or services they may be offering).  The focus should therefore be on giving the best possible customer experience and converting first-time visitors in particular to become happy and repeat customers. There are several ways in which businesses can improve things and in this brief article we will be looking at six of the most critical ones.

1. Every site needs to be easy to navigate. Fundamentally, any site structure should be what customer needs, not how the organization wants it to look like for internal purposes. Simple, clear and clean page design (with as little clutter as possible) focused on moving customers toward completion of their goal should be the focus.

2. Make it easy for the customer to pay. Many web sites offering products and/or services seem to be almost embarrassed to mention payment and both hide prices in obscure pages within the site and fail to give site browsers and easy way to check out. And there is no excuse for this approach today. If this is not available as a direct part of the web site design, a redirect or hosted page at which customers can view a bill digitally or make a payment in many ways is available from multiple sources.

3. Communicate product or service offers clearly. Companies need to use clear, concise wording to describe what they are offering. Once again, clear prices are critical, including any extra costs that may be applicable. If this is not the case site browsers are much more likely to abandon the site’s shopping cart (a massive problem for many organizations when they have already done so much work to get a customer so close to buying!).

4. Implement methods to improve your site conversion rate. Conversion rate is the measure how many browsers become buyers.  Conversion rates average 2.5%-3% but rates that reach 8% are not uncommon and some sites report conversion rates of even 20%. The very informative article "How To Sell More on the Web: 30 Tips To Increase Conversion Rates For An Ecommerce Site" will give you several ideas to improve your conversion rate.

5. Manage customers when they are about to abandon their shopping carts. By the time an organization has got a customer into its site shopping cart, they have done the hard work and need to close out with losing them at this last hurdle. Assuming the payment checkout experience has been designed to be a smooth and painless one, one extra step to be taken is to offer direct incentives if a customer still wants to abandon his or her purchase-this may be a further price decrease or more benefits or features (or even additional product or service).

6. Provide incentives to register (and come back). Even the most established web sites are struggling with increasing their goal of building a large pool of repeat customers. On average, it is estimated that 95-97% percent of those who visit sites on average never return, even when they have paid.  To prevent this, provide as much incentive as possible for customers to register so that future emails and alerts can be sent to visit the site again.

Summary

Ultimately, any businesses aiming to succeed online must rise above their resource constraints and strive to provide quality e-service. The above 6 actions sound easy to implement (and they are) but very few organizations bother to spend the time to do so. Any organization that takes the time and makes the above changes to their web site will therefore reap considerable commercial benefits.

The factors that help shape choice in the online payment world

There are now many payments types or channels available to both merchants and customers (cash, cheque, credit card, debit card, pre-paid card, direct debit, Internet direct bank transfer, e-wallet transfer etc). However, they all present different advantages and disadvantages, and these may be quite different for a consumer versus a merchant. However, by drawing together a range of international literature about payment systems and how they are used by people and organizations of all kinds, six attributes of payment products appear to be most relevant to the choices that are made of both merchants and their customers alike*. These six factors are:
capability

• cost
• convenience
• coverage
• confidence and
• confidentiality

Let’s look at each of these in a little more detail.
 
Capability

Capability refers to the functional ability to actually use a particular payment type or channel. For example, capability in cash transactions (the oldest and most ubiquitous of payment types) relates to a person or an organization being in a position to hand over a payment (having cash in an acceptable denomination/currency) and then receive the payment (also in an acceptable denomination/currency of course). This becomes a threshold issue in non-cash payments, which often involve technical issues such as the establishment of a means of communicating over distance, ability to verify the parties in a payment transaction, and many other factors.

Cost

All payment systems involve some costs (including cash). Both consumers and merchants are likely to seek to use lower cost payments if they can. This is especially the case if they can readily know what the use of each payment will cost them (sometimes this is transparent and sometimes it is not of course). The cost of a payment is not always spread evenly between the parties. Vendors of payment products will often seek to make some approaches appear to be no-cost or low-cost to the customer-but this may or may not be true. The cost structures of payment methods also differ; some have a fixed transaction charge while others are proportional to the size of the transaction.

Convenience

Convenience refers to the ease of use or “user-friendliness” of a payment method. A need for registration before using the payment method, or the speed of payment (for example, the time taken to approve a payment) can be factors affecting convenience. Consumers generally view cash as convenient to carry for small purchases at the point-of-sale. This means that to be competitive with cash, electronic payments systems have to offer a high level of convenience (hence all the current interest in mobile phone usage for payments). Businesses however typically have a very different perspective on convenience to that of consumers. They are likely to seek payment products and services that fit reasonably well into their broader processes and systems.

Coverage

Coverage refers to how widely a payment method or system is accepted by merchants and other recipients of payments, such as businesses receiving payments from suppliers. An important objective for all payment types and channels is therefore clearly to be widely accessible to merchants, traders, consumers and other users without high-entry or ongoing costs. Similarly, consumers should encounter as few barriers as possible in undertaking transactions using the chosen system.

Confidence

This refers to a customer’s belief that a payment will be successfully executed and completed, and that the value of a payment method will be respected. Confidence rises where arrangements are secure and value does not ‘leak’. The confidence that consumers have in a payment method also depends on the associated payment channel. For example, online payments with credit cards differ from offline payments, in that the card is not physically provided by the customer and the merchant does not obtain a signed confirmation from the customer. Some card schemes provide a system of cardholder authentication, usually through provision of name, credit card number and expiration date. To prevent illegitimate interception, this information is typically encrypted so as to increase levels of confidence in the payment system. 

Confidentiality

As a payment type only cash maintains payer and/or payee confidentiality. Non-cash payments often involve the collection of information that becomes valuable. Users of payment systems are often concerned about the collection and use of this often personal information, and its potential release to other parties, if not properly secured. For example, in general, credit card payments are made via an identifiable account, resulting in the loss of anonymity. This means that some individuals are uncomfortable or unhappy about using payment types or channels which cannot reasonably protect their personal information (and may increase the risk of theft or fraud).

Summary

Payment type or channel choices are complex for both a given consumer or merchant. However, in this article we have described six factors which seem to be most influential in the decision-making process. Although these factors all stand alone, they are not necessarily independent of one another of course. In other words, the boundaries between factors are often blurred of “fuzzy”.

In addition, it is also worth noting that any one of these factors can be primary, depending on a given individual or organizational perspective. For some consumers and/or merchants therefore, cost and convenience may be first and second (with other factors making little difference). However, for other consumers and/or merchants, capability, coverage and confidentiality may all have equal significance, for instance.

 

*The report by the Australian Government called “Exploration of future Electronic Payments” was extremely useful in assembling and describing the factors in more detail.

Will fees for processing online payments disappear completely?

For many years now, banks and other financial intuitions have been generating revenue from transactional fees of one kind or another. In fact, these fees can make up a large proportion of overall revenues and corresponding profits (in some cases constituting up to 50% of all profits in some banks). 

In general, fees fall into two categories-those that are charged to the end customer or the consumer and those that are charged to an organisation or merchant, when it wants to allow payment services to its customers.

Direct Customer fees

Transactional fees categories typically apply only to the customers of a given bank (as the bank has no direct relationship with other consumers) and even then, only when a customer has gone beyond what is deemed to be the core commercial relationship that the bank is prepared to offer at no direct cost. Hence, fees are typically charged to customers when they have overdrawn an account, written a cheque in circumstances where they are insufficient funds to cover it, or perhaps used an Automated teller machine or ATM in another banks’s network.. However, even here, a bank will allow many transactions without fees, if a customer maintains a positive balance (sometimes with a minimum threshold) or commits to regular income being paid in or saved every month. This is because banks worry a lot about customer “churn” and know that fees can often be a “switching factor” if they become too much of an irritant to an account holder (especially now that opening another bank account can be done online very easily in many cases).  The simple logic here is that it is more cost effective and profitable to keep good customers who transact regularly with a bank (and for the most part in the black) for what might be many years, than to risk losing them completely over a fair but nonetheless irritating fee that “pushes them over the edge”.  Even though this results in what might be seen as a better deal for the end consumer, banks still have to find ways to recover their internal transactional costs in some way. For some transactions, such as  bank cheques, wire transfers and transactions involving foreign exchange a customer will be relatively happy to pay (as these are often one off instances). However, these fees will not always cover the costs involved completely and it therefore often falls to the other major category to provide other fees that can cover costs and the bank’s overhead-the merchant.

Merchant fees

Although every individual commercial merchant relationship will be different, depending on a given organisation’s size, type of business, types of services offered etc, banks will typically charge a very wide variety of fees to most merchants.

The most obvious fees charged to merchants (because they have been around for a long time) are for cash and cheque handling. In both cases, these payment transactions are expensive for any financial institution because they involve human intervention and data entry (sometimes carried out multiple times). As with an end consumer, a merchant may be able to bring about lower fees by maintaining a positive balance or “float”. However, it is rare for any merchant these days to be able to operate without an overdraft at least some of the time, so fees in this area need to be monitored carefully.

Outside cash and cheque payments, the majority of fees that are charged by a bank a credit and debit card use fees. Cards are typically issued to a consumer without charge, and with no transaction fees when they are paid off regularly. However, the merchant will be charged for every transaction that a customer makes with a credit and/pr debit card and this may be a very complex affair. In some cases, the fee charged will be a single “aggregate rate” for say credit card use, such as 2.5% of the transaction size. Hence for a £100 consumer purchase, a charge of £2.50 will be made. However, this rate may vary from one transaction to another and this is because the aggregate rate is made up of many sub fees that every merchant needs to know about. Here are just some of the fee types that are typically charged:

The Discount Fee Rate

Credit and debit card companies (Visa and MasterCard being by far the largest of these) have what is called “interchange” rates. They range in price- so in order to make it easier, the merchant providers created three categories.

Qualified Discount Rate – a pre-set or agreed percentage is paid for each pound charged.

Non-Qualified Rate – a fee added to the qualified discount rate in certain transactions. For example, if a merchant does not use an address verification service (AVS) when they manually enter  or take a transaction.

Transaction Fees

This is a specific, flat rate that is paid on every sale processed through the credit card processor. (Sometimes the transaction fee is called the interchange fee, authorization fee, or per inquiry fee).

Address Verification Service (AVS)

Merchant banks charge a small fee for the validation service to ensure that the billing address provided in the online checkout process matches the issuing bank’s records. Not using this service will result in hefty charges on the processing of the card for that sale.

Batch Fees

Merchant banks require that customers close out their transactions a minimum of one time each day. The batch fee pays for expenses for the gateway or software that accesses the credit card processing network. If you don’t have transactions to process, there is no batch fee to pay.

Monthly Statement or Customer Service Fee

Most merchant banks charge a monthly fee in order to cover their monthly costs of operation (paying their customer service team for example).

Monthly Minimum Fee

Many merchant banks providers require a given organisation to process a minimum amounts of sales per month, or they pay a monthly minimum. Monthly minimums tend to range between £15 and £50 per month.

Gateway Fees

There are fees for internet and mail order merchants to use an internet gateway service such as Authorize.net, although some merchant providers will cover this fee on their customer’s behalf as part of the package deal. If you are solely an internet business, you’ll want to look for an internet merchant account that includes the gateway service as part of the package.

Annual Fees

These are often charged by Merchant banks  when free terminal equipment to take payment is offered. There are numerous merchant account providers that do not charge an annual fee, so you may want to shop around if the first few you look at require an annual fee. Sometimes it would be cheaper to purchase the equipment than to pay an ongoing annual fee.

Cancellation/Termination Fees

Most merchant accounts require a contract agreement of one or two years and if you cancel early, you are likely to be charged a termination fee.

Chargeback/Retrieval Fees

When a customer requests a refund (or the customer’s credit card issuer requests a refund), merchant account providers typically charge a “chargeback” fee.