The factors that help shape choice in the online payment world

There are now many payments types or channels available to both merchants and customers (cash, cheque, credit card, debit card, pre-paid card, direct debit, Internet direct bank transfer, e-wallet transfer etc.). However, they all present different advantages and disadvantages, and these may be quite different for a consumer versus a merchant. However, by drawing together a range of international literature about payment systems and how they are used by people and organizations of all kinds, six attributes of payment products appear to be most relevant to the choices that are made of both merchants and their customers alike*. These six factors are:
capability

• cost
• convenience
• coverage
• confidence and
• confidentiality

Let’s look at each of these in a little more detail.

Capability

Capability refers to the functional ability to actually use a particular payment type or channel. For example, capability in cash transactions (the oldest and most ubiquitous of payment types) relates to a person or an organization being in a position to hand over a payment (having cash in an acceptable denomination/currency) and then receive the payment (also in an acceptable denomination/currency of course). This becomes a threshold issue in non-cash payments, which often involve technical issues such as the establishment of a means of communicating over distance, ability to verify the parties in a payment transaction, and many other factors.

Cost

All payment systems involve some costs (including cash). Both consumers and merchants are likely to seek to use lower cost payments if they can. This is especially the case if they can readily know what the use of each payment will cost them (sometimes this is transparent and sometimes it is not of course). The cost of a payment is not always spread evenly between the parties. Vendors of payment products will often seek to make some approaches appear to be no-cost or low-cost to the customer-but this may or may not be true. The cost structures of payment methods also differ; some have a fixed transaction charge while others are proportional to the size of the transaction.

Convenience

Convenience refers to the ease of use or “user-friendliness” of a payment method. A need for registration before using the payment method, or the speed of payment (for example, the time taken to approve a payment) can be factors affecting convenience. Consumers generally view cash as convenient to carry for small purchases at the point-of-sale. This means that to be competitive with cash, electronic payments systems have to offer a high level of convenience (hence all the current interest in mobile phone usage for payments). Businesses however typically have a very different perspective on convenience to that of consumers. They are likely to seek payment products and services that fit reasonably well into their broader processes and systems.

Coverage

Coverage refers to how widely a payment method or system is accepted by merchants and other recipients of payments, such as businesses receiving payments from suppliers. An important objective for all payment types and channels is therefore clearly to be widely accessible to merchants, traders, consumers and other users without high-entry or ongoing costs. Similarly, consumers should encounter as few barriers as possible in undertaking transactions using the chosen system.

Confidence

This refers to a customer’s belief that a payment will be successfully executed and completed, and that the value of a payment method will be respected. Confidence rises where arrangements are secure and value does not ‘leak’. The confidence that consumers have in a payment method also depends on the associated payment channel. For example, online payments with credit cards differ from offline payments, in that the card is not physically provided by the customer and the merchant does not obtain a signed confirmation from the customer. Some card schemes provide a system of cardholder authentication, usually through provision of name, credit card number and expiration date. To prevent illegitimate interception, this information is typically encrypted so as to increase levels of confidence in the payment system. 

Confidentiality

As a payment type only cash maintains payer and/or payee confidentiality. Non-cash payments often involve the collection of information that becomes valuable. Users of payment systems are often concerned about the collection and use of this often personal information, and its potential release to other parties, if not properly secured. For example, in general, credit card payments are made via an identifiable account, resulting in the loss of anonymity. This means that some individuals are uncomfortable or unhappy about using payment types or channels which cannot reasonably protect their personal information (and may increase the risk of theft or fraud).

Summary

Payment type or channel choices are complex for both a given consumer or merchant. However, in this article we have described six factors which seem to be most influential in the decision-making process. Although these factors all stand alone, they are not necessarily independent of one another of course. In other words, the boundaries between factors are often blurred of “fuzzy”.

In addition, it is also worth noting that any one of these factors can be primary, depending on a given individual or organizational perspective. For some consumers and/or merchants therefore, cost and convenience may be first and second (with other factors making little difference). However, for other consumers and/or merchants, capability, coverage and confidentiality may all have equal significance, for instance.

*The report by the Australian Government called “Exploration of future Electronic Payments” was extremely useful in assembling and describing the factors in more detail.

Can Better Billing Practices Improve Merchant Cash-flow, Cost Effectiveness and Customer Satisfaction?

Or why does efficient and effective billing practices deliver greater Cash-flow, Cost effectiveness and Customer Satisfaction for the merchant and more Convenience, Clarity/Certainty and Choice for the consumer-the 6 C’s

Billing is never the most exciting of subjects for business owners or managers, coming as it does as the last and perhaps most administrative or clerical step in the sales to delivery cycle. However, being a last step should not relegate it to being the least important and there is actually plenty of evidence to suggest that efficient billing practices may be one of the most critical. In this article we will therefore briefly explore why better billing practices can have a significant impact on cash-flow, cost-effectiveness and customer satisfaction for the merchant (as well as several equally beneficial, and linked outcomes for their customers).

Before we look at each of these 3 merchant benefits in turn, let’s define what we mean by “efficient billing practices”. Presenting a bill or invoice can clearly be done in person (albeit rarely), in the physical mail (with a stamp), via an email (typically with a PDF attachment) or by digital means (via an Internet web site). All four of these options can be relatively “efficient” if they reach the right person quickly and facilitate the earliest possible settlement. However, experience (and much research) tells us that these practices are likely to be progressively more effective in the order in which they are listed. In other words, a full digital presentment of the bill is likely to be a much better option that delivering a bill by email, which in turn is better than doing so by physical mail etc. In this article we will therefore assume that a merchant will have, or aspire to have, the most efficient and effective approach –a full digital e-bill and it will be our contention that getting this bill delivered allows all the benefits we will elaborate upon subsequently to follow. The diagram below illustrates this rather more visually.

 

© PaySwyft, 2011. All Rights Reserved

Greater Cash-flow

The vast majority of organisations that supply a product or render a service to another organisation, or an end consumer, usually do so on credit terms (a lucky few get paid ahead of time of course). To operate somewhat like a lending bank, an organisation must therefore use shareholder funds, cash in its bank account,  supplier credit (if they have any) or other money that is borrowed in some way (with interest being payable). These credit terms, or what is sometimes easier to visualise as the time taken to receive payment from customers, can have a huge impact on the working capital needed by a business and thereby have a critical affect on cash-flow. From the point of the delivery, spending days preparing and sending an invoice along with offering normal credit terms for a given industry (say 30 day terms on average), might mean that a particular enterprise may have an average days outstanding in practice of 40-45 days to get paid. Even for a relatively small business turning over say £500,000 a year this would mean working capital of £30,000 needs to be maintained just to stay in business (or in this case 6% of turnover).

Given the above, if a merchant takes its billing practices seriously, it should present an invoice to the customer in the fastest way possible (ideally digitally, the day after delivery-or even the same day perhaps). In addition, with a full digital bill, an opportunity can be offered to check that the bill has all the information that the customer needs to see and in as much detail and as they need to see it. This creates clarity and certainty that they are paying appropriately for what they have received. On a digitally presented bill, “clickable” payment options can allow the customer to render payment immediately (at the same web site and in the same session) or perhaps schedule a payment there and then (especially if there are multiple payment choices available, which we will look at later). All of this combines to ensure that invoice days outstanding are reduced, in some cases by up to 30-40%. This clearly has a very positive impact on cash-flow and allows working capital to be reduced or freed up for other uses (in the above small business example it could lead to 2-3% of total revenue in savings).

Greater Cost Effectiveness

It is estimated that physical bills (paper-base ones) still account for around 80% of the total volume of bills in all major economies, where there is good data to measure it such as the UK, Australia, Canada, France, Holland, Germany, New Zealand, Singapore, Sweden, and the US (amongst others).

The direct costs of preparing an invoice and sending it in the mail alone are relatively high, especially in an age when we can send almost any document electronically. However, they are even higher when you factor in the indirect costs associated with the potential for keying errors, mis-delivery and loss and the extra time often needed for accounting and reconciliation (to name but a few problems). The email based bill (now accounting for around 15% of the total volume of bills according to most research) removes some of the direct costs above, but almost none of the indirect costs of keying errors and mis-delivery, and extra time needed for accounting and reconciliation. The full digital bill is the only option therefore which has the scope to make a large dent in both direct and indirect costs.

With a well-designed system, a fully digital billing approach allows the customer to see the full bill immediately it is delivered (24/7 and 365 days a year) to analyse it versus other bills from the same merchant potentially and to immediately effect payment (or plan for it to occur on the system). This therefore affords much greater customer convenience (especially when they can use the system for their own personal bill storage and not have to wait for a merchant call-centre to be open to take a payment, for instance). However, the major benefits to the merchant are in having a full electronic record of each transaction (individually or in aggregate), with as much detail as they wish to see. And by maintaining the whole billing process in electronic form, all the data can flow in digital form in all directions, including reconciliation in the accounting system-thereby saving many labour hours and costs.

Greater Customer Satisfaction

When customers are asked about their overall experiences of organisational billing (in general) they will tend to mention three factors more than any other.

The first is that it should offer “clarity and certainty”. By this they typically mean that it should be a clear and easy to follow invoice, be accurate, be securely delivered to them and reflect what they have purchased in a certain way.

Secondly, they will typically say that a bill should be “conveniently” presented.  Mailing it may meet this need (physically or by email) but digitally allows it to be viewed at any time day and night and, if it is user-friendly enough, can allow for further detail to be scrutinised, when desired.

Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, customers will nominate the need for “choice” to be available to them. On the presentment side this may be whether to pay the bill now or later or to set up a scheduled or recurrent payment (with associated electronic alerts and reminders to an email account of mobile phone, as needed). On the payment side, this may be to have lots of immediate and widespread payment types or options to be used on both the debit and credit side if possible. In a well-designed digital billing web site, all of this can be available with an even greater range of choices being available in terms of individual customer preferences, in many cases.

Summary

In conclusion then it should by now be clear that the apparently basic and administrative item of a simple bill to a customer can be presented in a way that can have a significant bearing on Cash-flow, Cost Control and Customer Satisfaction. A well-designed and fully electronic or digital billing process will typically give the best results and all organisations should therefore consider moving to such a system as quickly as possible, especially if they can add it as an additional channel to existing practices (minimising disruption) and on a pay-as-you-go basis (as offered by systems such as PaySwyft for example).

 

 

 

Embracing E-Invoicing -The Barriers vs. Benefits

Two recent surveys (one in the US and one in Europe) have confirmed that 20% of survey  population respondents (on average) were already using a form of e-invoicing, with a further 50% actively evaluating adopting it in the near future.

These two surveys ultimately conclude that the benefits of embracing e-invoicing outweigh the barriers, for most organizations, but suggest that particular barriers will inhibit the time taken to adopt the technology or the time taken for it to become fully utilized. Let’s therefore look at these barriers and benefits in more detail:

The Barriers

The greatest perceived barriers to adopting e-invoicing is current work processes or existing process design around issuing an invoice and getting paid (and the inability to change these processes quickly or effectively). Close behind is the lack of budget to develop or purchase new e-invoicing software, or pay any incremental, up-front costs, even if this led to significant medium to long-term savings. A lack of executive sponsorship is also cited as a commonplace barrier, with the CEO or CFO most commonly expected to be a major driver of adoption in most cases.

Other commonly cited barriers are having insufficient resources to bring in a new approach (mainly people) and the associated lack of time and resources to integrate e-invoicing with current systems or software (especially on the accounting side of things). In addition, lack of awareness about available forward options and possible supplier resistance were also cited as being significant factors.

The Benefits

The greatest perceived benefits to adopting e-invoicing is its capacity to better control the whole billing process much more effectively (at every level and from bill or invoice issue to ultimate payment). This includes the capacity to ensure that invoices were less frequently lost, missing or duplicated. E-invoicing is also expected to reduce billing and payment processing costs significantly and also to decrease payment cycle times. The capacity to also dramatically reduce errors and exceptions is also seen as a significant benefit.

Another major cited benefit of e-invoicing is the capacity for e-invoicing to increase on-time payments (and even accelerate cash-flow) and to increase choice when it comes to invoice payment options and potentially when an invoice can be paid.

What does this mean to those organizations thinking about e-invoicing?

Any organization interested in saving expenses and accelerating cash-flow would be wise to research the e-invoicing options available to them (of which there are several, including cloud-based and “pay-as-you-go” systems (which avoid capital outlays and long integration effort) such as Payswyft, which immediately solve other barriers such as lack of budget and resources and the need for integration time and effort. In addition, the CEO or CFO of an enterprise should ideally act as a project champion, helping his or her organization to evaluate specific options and how particular barriers need to be overcome. In taking these two steps alone, most organizations would smooth the path to embracing e-invoicing and be able to realize the substantial benefits much more quickly (in terms of lowering their own costs and giving their customers a much better payment experience).

The factors that help shape choice in the online payment world

There are now many payments types or channels available to both merchants and customers (cash, cheque, credit card, debit card, pre-paid card, direct debit, Internet direct bank transfer, e-wallet transfer etc). However, they all present different advantages and disadvantages, and these may be quite different for a consumer versus a merchant. However, by drawing together a range of international literature about payment systems and how they are used by people and organizations of all kinds, six attributes of payment products appear to be most relevant to the choices that are made of both merchants and their customers alike*. These six factors are:
capability

• cost
• convenience
• coverage
• confidence and
• confidentiality

Let’s look at each of these in a little more detail.
 
Capability

Capability refers to the functional ability to actually use a particular payment type or channel. For example, capability in cash transactions (the oldest and most ubiquitous of payment types) relates to a person or an organization being in a position to hand over a payment (having cash in an acceptable denomination/currency) and then receive the payment (also in an acceptable denomination/currency of course). This becomes a threshold issue in non-cash payments, which often involve technical issues such as the establishment of a means of communicating over distance, ability to verify the parties in a payment transaction, and many other factors.

Cost

All payment systems involve some costs (including cash). Both consumers and merchants are likely to seek to use lower cost payments if they can. This is especially the case if they can readily know what the use of each payment will cost them (sometimes this is transparent and sometimes it is not of course). The cost of a payment is not always spread evenly between the parties. Vendors of payment products will often seek to make some approaches appear to be no-cost or low-cost to the customer-but this may or may not be true. The cost structures of payment methods also differ; some have a fixed transaction charge while others are proportional to the size of the transaction.

Convenience

Convenience refers to the ease of use or “user-friendliness” of a payment method. A need for registration before using the payment method, or the speed of payment (for example, the time taken to approve a payment) can be factors affecting convenience. Consumers generally view cash as convenient to carry for small purchases at the point-of-sale. This means that to be competitive with cash, electronic payments systems have to offer a high level of convenience (hence all the current interest in mobile phone usage for payments). Businesses however typically have a very different perspective on convenience to that of consumers. They are likely to seek payment products and services that fit reasonably well into their broader processes and systems.

Coverage

Coverage refers to how widely a payment method or system is accepted by merchants and other recipients of payments, such as businesses receiving payments from suppliers. An important objective for all payment types and channels is therefore clearly to be widely accessible to merchants, traders, consumers and other users without high-entry or ongoing costs. Similarly, consumers should encounter as few barriers as possible in undertaking transactions using the chosen system.

Confidence

This refers to a customer’s belief that a payment will be successfully executed and completed, and that the value of a payment method will be respected. Confidence rises where arrangements are secure and value does not ‘leak’. The confidence that consumers have in a payment method also depends on the associated payment channel. For example, online payments with credit cards differ from offline payments, in that the card is not physically provided by the customer and the merchant does not obtain a signed confirmation from the customer. Some card schemes provide a system of cardholder authentication, usually through provision of name, credit card number and expiration date. To prevent illegitimate interception, this information is typically encrypted so as to increase levels of confidence in the payment system. 

Confidentiality

As a payment type only cash maintains payer and/or payee confidentiality. Non-cash payments often involve the collection of information that becomes valuable. Users of payment systems are often concerned about the collection and use of this often personal information, and its potential release to other parties, if not properly secured. For example, in general, credit card payments are made via an identifiable account, resulting in the loss of anonymity. This means that some individuals are uncomfortable or unhappy about using payment types or channels which cannot reasonably protect their personal information (and may increase the risk of theft or fraud).

Summary

Payment type or channel choices are complex for both a given consumer or merchant. However, in this article we have described six factors which seem to be most influential in the decision-making process. Although these factors all stand alone, they are not necessarily independent of one another of course. In other words, the boundaries between factors are often blurred of “fuzzy”.

In addition, it is also worth noting that any one of these factors can be primary, depending on a given individual or organizational perspective. For some consumers and/or merchants therefore, cost and convenience may be first and second (with other factors making little difference). However, for other consumers and/or merchants, capability, coverage and confidentiality may all have equal significance, for instance.

 

*The report by the Australian Government called “Exploration of future Electronic Payments” was extremely useful in assembling and describing the factors in more detail.

Developing a Payment Strategy-Step 4- Making as much payment choice available as possible.

In exploring what is involved in developing an overall payments strategy, in this article we will look at the fourth phase of five in total, which is making as much payment choice available to customers as possible.

Every organisation wants to get paid (and as quickly as possible) but there are clearly many ways in which this may be done by customers. This creates an interesting dilemma. On the one hand, by keeping payment choices to a minimum, complexity is reduced for the organisation but flexibility of options is decreased for the customer. On the other hand, a wide array of payment options creates high customer choice but with a high degree of handling complexity for the business. In the past, the size of the average transaction, the billing cycle frequency and the volume were the main determinants of strategy here (and may have favoured fewer payment choices such as cheque and direct debit only for instance as a way of keeping things simple and processing costs low) but with the more widespread use of the Internet for payments in recent years, the balance towards greater customer payment option choice has become much easier and therefore compelling. 

Offering a wider choice of payments incorporates not only varying payment channels but also a variety of payment types. Different channels include the traditional ones of mailed-in cheques and direct bank transfer (direct debit or standing order) but these days can often also include operating a central call centre (in-house or outsourced), automated telephone services or payment via the web (at a company built or third-party site). Different types of payment include cheque, cash and bank transfer, but can be easily extended to a wide variety of credit and debit cards, pre-paid cards and e-wallet transfers.

Internet technology now allows considerable flexibility for an organisation of any size to offer most of the above channels with a web site at the hub of the offering. In addition, an e-payment gateway can now be relatively easily added to enable credit side and debit side, options, as well as e-wallet payments to be taken online. Perhaps even more attractive to an organisation is adding a reputable third-party electronic billing and payment aggregation destination site (such as PaySwyft) as an offering in the overall mix. At such a site, an organisation can present all of its bills in digital form and then allow these bills to be paid with almost every available payment type, including cash in many cases. Because the aggregator takes the payments, collects them together electronically and then settles to its merchants online also, this helps to drive down the internal expense of payment call handling and the acceptance and reconciliation costs of handling cheques (and any other paper-based transactions).

Whatever approach selected by an organisation, today’s customers prefer a variety of payment options to be available meet their different and often changing needs when it comes to paying invoices. The reward for making this available is quicker settlement and thereby accelerated cash-flow. A wise business therefore finds the most cost-effective ways to offer as much choice as they can.

In our next article in this series, we will look at the next phase in developing the Payment Strategy- Building a seamless payments process.

Developing a Payment Strategy-Step 3- Giving customers as user-friendly a billing and payment experience as possible.

In exploring what is involved in developing an overall payments strategy, in this article we will look at the third phase of five in total, which is giving customers as user-friendly a billing and payment experience as possible.

Most dictionaries suggest that user-friendliness involves making a customer process as easy to learn and operate as possible. In practical terms, this often boils down to making sure that language is straightforward and unambiguous. In a web site environment, this will mean making sure that screens are clean and uncluttered, and navigation is both speedy and efficient etc. However, when it comes to a relatively uninteresting task such as receiving and paying bills, it is suggested that the key to user-friendliness is clarity, convenience, choice and control. Let’s therefore look at each of these in a little more detail

Clarity
Many organisations confuse their customers by either failing to let them know clearly how payment can be made for products or services supplied, or bury the information in places where it cannot easily be found (or is difficult to understand when a customer does stumble across it). Customers need simple and clear language about where how they can receive a bill and where, when and how they can pay that bill. In a web site, “ways to pay” is often therefore a simple addition (as a page or a tab) especially when they can click a link and make a payment there and then.

Convenience
In general, convenience is something that increases comfort or saves work. When it comes to billing or payment therefore, the offered approach should allow greater comfort (being able to complete the whole task on line, at home, on a mobile etc) or less work (do it quicker, without having to rely on the physical mail, avoid paper-based copying/storage etc). This might also involve a more convenient web site experience (less clicks, more clickable options or deeper/better analysis when needed).

Choice
All customers like to have choices available (whether or not they use them). In bill presentment and payment, this typically means allowing customers to view their bill in flexible ways. In a web site, this might include the ability to view a mini bill or clickable bill detail. On the payment side, choice involves providing different payment mechanisms. We will look at this issue in more detail in step 4 of this series but in summary this should ideally include as many debit and credit side options as possible so that customers can settle a bill in a way that suits them (which they are more likely to do much more quickly when several choices are made available to them).

Control
According to recent research, customers will pay between 10 and 17 bills a month and may not feel that they are very much in control when these arrive at different times in the mail, are chased frequently and may specify few ways for payment to be made. Using online technology to both issue bills and allowed them to be paid flexibly is one way to overcome many of these frustrations and this has other advantages. In an online bill and payment environment, customers can store their bills electronically (and retrieve them when wanted) can calendarise payment to suit them, get immediate receipt of payment (giving the confidence and security that settlement has occurred) and can analyse bill data whenever and however they like. This all helps the customer feel that they are more in control.

In our next article in this series, we will look at the next phase in developing the Payment Strategy- making as much payment choice available as possible to customers.

Can Better Billing Practices Improve Merchant Cash-flow, Cost Effectiveness and Customer Satisfaction?

This blog article explores whether more efficient and effective billing practices deliver greater Cash-flow, Cost effectiveness and Customer Satisfaction for the merchant and more Convenience, Clarity/Certainty and Choice for the consumer-the 6 C’s

Billing is never the most exciting of subjects for business owners or managers, coming as it does as the last and perhaps most administrative or clerical step in the sales to delivery cycle. However, being a last step should not relegate it to being the least important and there is actually plenty of evidence to suggest that efficient billing practices may be one of the most critical. In this article we will therefore briefly explore why better billing practices can have a significant impact on cash-flow, cost-effectiveness and customer satisfaction for the merchant (as well as several equally beneficial, and linked, outcomes for their customers).

Before we look at each of these 3 merchant benefits in turn, let’s define what we mean by “efficient billing practices”. Presenting a bill or invoice can clearly be done in person (albeit rarely), in the physical mail (with a stamp), via an email (typically with a PDF attachment) or by digital means (via an Internet web site). All four of these options can be relatively “efficient” if they reach the right person quickly and facilitate the earliest possible settlement. However, experience (and much research) tells us that these practices are likely to be progressively more effective in the order in which they are listed. In other words, a full digital presentment of the bill is likely to be a much better option that delivering a bill by email, which in turn is better than doing so by physical mail etc. In this article we will therefore assume that a merchant will have, or aspire to have, the most efficient and effective approach –a full digital e-bill and it will be our contention that getting this bill delivered allows all the benefits we will elaborate upon subsequently to follow. The diagram below illustrates this rather more visually.

© PaySwyft, 2011. All Rights Reserved





Greater Cash-flow
The vast majority of organisations that supply a product or render a service to another organisation, or an end consumer, usually do so on credit terms (a lucky few get paid ahead of time of course). To operate somewhat like a lending bank, an organisation must therefore use shareholder funds, cash in its bank account, supplier credit (if they have any) or other money that is borrowed in some way (with interest being payable). These credit terms, or what is sometimes easier to visualise as the time taken to receive payment from customers, can have a huge impact on the working capital needed by a business and thereby have a critical affect on cash-flow. From the point of the delivery, spending days preparing and sending an invoice along with offering normal credit terms for a given industry (say 30 day terms on average), might mean that a particular enterprise may have an average days outstanding in practice of 40-45 days to get paid. Even for a relatively small business turning over say £500,000 a year this would mean working capital of £30,000 needs to be maintained just to stay in business (or in this case 6% of turnover).

Given the above, if a merchant takes its billing practices seriously, it should present an invoice to the customer in the fastest way possible (ideally digitally, the day after delivery-or even the same day perhaps). In addition, with a full digital bill, an opportunity can be offered to check that the bill has all the information that the customer needs to see and in as much detail and as they need to see it. This creates clarity and certainty that they are paying appropriately for what they have received. On a digitally presented bill, “clickable” payment options can allow the customer to render payment immediately (at the same web site and in the same session) or perhaps schedule a payment there and then (especially if there are multiple payment choices available, which we will look at later). All of this combines to ensure that invoice days outstanding are reduced, in some cases by up to 30-40%. This clearly has a very positive impact on cash-flow and allows working capital to be reduced or freed up for other uses (in the above small business example it could lead to 2-3% of total revenue in savings).

Greater Cost Effectiveness
It is estimated that physical bills (paper-base ones) still account for around 80% of the total volume of bills in all major economies, where there is good data to measure it such as the UK, Australia, Canada, France, Holland, Germany, New Zealand, Singapore, Sweden, and the US (amongst others).

The direct costs of preparing an invoice and sending it in the mail alone are relatively high, especially in an age when we can send almost any document electronically. However, they are even higher when you factor in the indirect costs associated with the potential for keying errors, mis-delivery and loss and the extra time often needed for accounting and reconciliation (to name but a few problems). The email based bill (now accounting for around 15% of the total volume of bills according to most research) removes some of the direct costs above, but almost none of the indirect costs of keying errors and mis-delivery, and extra time needed for accounting and reconciliation. The full digital bill is the only option therefore which has the scope to make a large dent in both direct and indirect costs.

With a well-designed system, a fully digital billing approach allows the customer to see the full bill immediately it is delivered (24/7 and 365 days a year) to analyse it versus other bills from the same merchant potentially and to immediately effect payment (or plan for it to occur on the system). This therefore affords much greater customer convenience (especially when they can use the system for their own personal bill storage and not have to wait for a merchant call-centre to be open to take a payment, for instance). However, the major benefits to the merchant are in having a full electronic record of each transaction (individually or in aggregate), with as much detail as they wish to see. And by maintaining the whole billing process in electronic form, all the data can flow in digital form in all directions, including reconciliation in the accounting system-thereby saving many labour hours and costs.

Greater Customer Satisfaction
When customers are asked about their overall experiences of organisational billing (in general) they will tend to mention three factors more than any other.

The first is that it should offer “clarity and certainty”. By this they typically mean that it should be a clear and easy to follow invoice, be accurate, be securely delivered to them and reflect what they have purchased in a certain way.

Secondly, they will typically say that a bill should be “conveniently” presented. Mailing it may meet this need (physically or by email) but digitally allows it to be viewed at any time day and night and, if it is user-friendly enough, can allow for further detail to be scrutinised, when desired.

Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, customers will nominate the need for “choice” to be available to them. On the presentment side this may be whether to pay the bill now or later or to set up a scheduled or recurrent payment (with associated electronic alerts and reminders to an email account of mobile phone, as needed). On the payment side, this may be to have lots of immediate and widespread payment types or options to be used on both the debit and credit side if possible. In a well-designed digital billing web site, all of this can be available with an even greater range of choices being available in terms of individual customer preferences, in many cases.

Summary
In conclusion then it should by now be clear that the apparently basic and administrative item of a simple bill to a customer can be presented in a way that can have a significant bearing on Cash-flow, Cost Control and Customer Satisfaction. A well-designed and fully electronic or digital billing process will typically give the best results and all organisations should therefore consider moving to such a system as quickly as possible, especially if they can add it as an additional channel to existing practices (minimising disruption) and on a pay-as-you-go basis (as offered by systems such as PaySwyft for example).