The factors that help shape choice in the online payment world

There are now many payments types or channels available to both merchants and customers (cash, cheque, credit card, debit card, pre-paid card, direct debit, Internet direct bank transfer, e-wallet transfer etc). However, they all present different advantages and disadvantages, and these may be quite different for a consumer versus a merchant. However, by drawing together a range of international literature about payment systems and how they are used by people and organizations of all kinds, six attributes of payment products appear to be most relevant to the choices that are made of both merchants and their customers alike*. These six factors are:
capability

• cost
• convenience
• coverage
• confidence and
• confidentiality

Let’s look at each of these in a little more detail.
 
Capability

Capability refers to the functional ability to actually use a particular payment type or channel. For example, capability in cash transactions (the oldest and most ubiquitous of payment types) relates to a person or an organization being in a position to hand over a payment (having cash in an acceptable denomination/currency) and then receive the payment (also in an acceptable denomination/currency of course). This becomes a threshold issue in non-cash payments, which often involve technical issues such as the establishment of a means of communicating over distance, ability to verify the parties in a payment transaction, and many other factors.

Cost

All payment systems involve some costs (including cash). Both consumers and merchants are likely to seek to use lower cost payments if they can. This is especially the case if they can readily know what the use of each payment will cost them (sometimes this is transparent and sometimes it is not of course). The cost of a payment is not always spread evenly between the parties. Vendors of payment products will often seek to make some approaches appear to be no-cost or low-cost to the customer-but this may or may not be true. The cost structures of payment methods also differ; some have a fixed transaction charge while others are proportional to the size of the transaction.

Convenience

Convenience refers to the ease of use or “user-friendliness” of a payment method. A need for registration before using the payment method, or the speed of payment (for example, the time taken to approve a payment) can be factors affecting convenience. Consumers generally view cash as convenient to carry for small purchases at the point-of-sale. This means that to be competitive with cash, electronic payments systems have to offer a high level of convenience (hence all the current interest in mobile phone usage for payments). Businesses however typically have a very different perspective on convenience to that of consumers. They are likely to seek payment products and services that fit reasonably well into their broader processes and systems.

Coverage

Coverage refers to how widely a payment method or system is accepted by merchants and other recipients of payments, such as businesses receiving payments from suppliers. An important objective for all payment types and channels is therefore clearly to be widely accessible to merchants, traders, consumers and other users without high-entry or ongoing costs. Similarly, consumers should encounter as few barriers as possible in undertaking transactions using the chosen system.

Confidence

This refers to a customer’s belief that a payment will be successfully executed and completed, and that the value of a payment method will be respected. Confidence rises where arrangements are secure and value does not ‘leak’. The confidence that consumers have in a payment method also depends on the associated payment channel. For example, online payments with credit cards differ from offline payments, in that the card is not physically provided by the customer and the merchant does not obtain a signed confirmation from the customer. Some card schemes provide a system of cardholder authentication, usually through provision of name, credit card number and expiration date. To prevent illegitimate interception, this information is typically encrypted so as to increase levels of confidence in the payment system. 

Confidentiality

As a payment type only cash maintains payer and/or payee confidentiality. Non-cash payments often involve the collection of information that becomes valuable. Users of payment systems are often concerned about the collection and use of this often personal information, and its potential release to other parties, if not properly secured. For example, in general, credit card payments are made via an identifiable account, resulting in the loss of anonymity. This means that some individuals are uncomfortable or unhappy about using payment types or channels which cannot reasonably protect their personal information (and may increase the risk of theft or fraud).

Summary

Payment type or channel choices are complex for both a given consumer or merchant. However, in this article we have described six factors which seem to be most influential in the decision-making process. Although these factors all stand alone, they are not necessarily independent of one another of course. In other words, the boundaries between factors are often blurred of “fuzzy”.

In addition, it is also worth noting that any one of these factors can be primary, depending on a given individual or organizational perspective. For some consumers and/or merchants therefore, cost and convenience may be first and second (with other factors making little difference). However, for other consumers and/or merchants, capability, coverage and confidentiality may all have equal significance, for instance.

 

*The report by the Australian Government called “Exploration of future Electronic Payments” was extremely useful in assembling and describing the factors in more detail.

Will fees for processing online payments disappear completely?

For many years now, banks and other financial intuitions have been generating revenue from transactional fees of one kind or another. In fact, these fees can make up a large proportion of overall revenues and corresponding profits (in some cases constituting up to 50% of all profits in some banks). 

In general, fees fall into two categories-those that are charged to the end customer or the consumer and those that are charged to an organisation or merchant, when it wants to allow payment services to its customers.

Direct Customer fees

Transactional fees categories typically apply only to the customers of a given bank (as the bank has no direct relationship with other consumers) and even then, only when a customer has gone beyond what is deemed to be the core commercial relationship that the bank is prepared to offer at no direct cost. Hence, fees are typically charged to customers when they have overdrawn an account, written a cheque in circumstances where they are insufficient funds to cover it, or perhaps used an Automated teller machine or ATM in another banks’s network.. However, even here, a bank will allow many transactions without fees, if a customer maintains a positive balance (sometimes with a minimum threshold) or commits to regular income being paid in or saved every month. This is because banks worry a lot about customer “churn” and know that fees can often be a “switching factor” if they become too much of an irritant to an account holder (especially now that opening another bank account can be done online very easily in many cases).  The simple logic here is that it is more cost effective and profitable to keep good customers who transact regularly with a bank (and for the most part in the black) for what might be many years, than to risk losing them completely over a fair but nonetheless irritating fee that “pushes them over the edge”.  Even though this results in what might be seen as a better deal for the end consumer, banks still have to find ways to recover their internal transactional costs in some way. For some transactions, such as  bank cheques, wire transfers and transactions involving foreign exchange a customer will be relatively happy to pay (as these are often one off instances). However, these fees will not always cover the costs involved completely and it therefore often falls to the other major category to provide other fees that can cover costs and the bank’s overhead-the merchant.

Merchant fees

Although every individual commercial merchant relationship will be different, depending on a given organisation’s size, type of business, types of services offered etc, banks will typically charge a very wide variety of fees to most merchants.

The most obvious fees charged to merchants (because they have been around for a long time) are for cash and cheque handling. In both cases, these payment transactions are expensive for any financial institution because they involve human intervention and data entry (sometimes carried out multiple times). As with an end consumer, a merchant may be able to bring about lower fees by maintaining a positive balance or “float”. However, it is rare for any merchant these days to be able to operate without an overdraft at least some of the time, so fees in this area need to be monitored carefully.

Outside cash and cheque payments, the majority of fees that are charged by a bank a credit and debit card use fees. Cards are typically issued to a consumer without charge, and with no transaction fees when they are paid off regularly. However, the merchant will be charged for every transaction that a customer makes with a credit and/pr debit card and this may be a very complex affair. In some cases, the fee charged will be a single “aggregate rate” for say credit card use, such as 2.5% of the transaction size. Hence for a £100 consumer purchase, a charge of £2.50 will be made. However, this rate may vary from one transaction to another and this is because the aggregate rate is made up of many sub fees that every merchant needs to know about. Here are just some of the fee types that are typically charged:

The Discount Fee Rate

Credit and debit card companies (Visa and MasterCard being by far the largest of these) have what is called “interchange” rates. They range in price- so in order to make it easier, the merchant providers created three categories.

Qualified Discount Rate – a pre-set or agreed percentage is paid for each pound charged.

Non-Qualified Rate – a fee added to the qualified discount rate in certain transactions. For example, if a merchant does not use an address verification service (AVS) when they manually enter  or take a transaction.

Transaction Fees

This is a specific, flat rate that is paid on every sale processed through the credit card processor. (Sometimes the transaction fee is called the interchange fee, authorization fee, or per inquiry fee).

Address Verification Service (AVS)

Merchant banks charge a small fee for the validation service to ensure that the billing address provided in the online checkout process matches the issuing bank’s records. Not using this service will result in hefty charges on the processing of the card for that sale.

Batch Fees

Merchant banks require that customers close out their transactions a minimum of one time each day. The batch fee pays for expenses for the gateway or software that accesses the credit card processing network. If you don’t have transactions to process, there is no batch fee to pay.

Monthly Statement or Customer Service Fee

Most merchant banks charge a monthly fee in order to cover their monthly costs of operation (paying their customer service team for example).

Monthly Minimum Fee

Many merchant banks providers require a given organisation to process a minimum amounts of sales per month, or they pay a monthly minimum. Monthly minimums tend to range between £15 and £50 per month.

Gateway Fees

There are fees for internet and mail order merchants to use an internet gateway service such as Authorize.net, although some merchant providers will cover this fee on their customer’s behalf as part of the package deal. If you are solely an internet business, you’ll want to look for an internet merchant account that includes the gateway service as part of the package.

Annual Fees

These are often charged by Merchant banks  when free terminal equipment to take payment is offered. There are numerous merchant account providers that do not charge an annual fee, so you may want to shop around if the first few you look at require an annual fee. Sometimes it would be cheaper to purchase the equipment than to pay an ongoing annual fee.

Cancellation/Termination Fees

Most merchant accounts require a contract agreement of one or two years and if you cancel early, you are likely to be charged a termination fee.

Chargeback/Retrieval Fees

When a customer requests a refund (or the customer’s credit card issuer requests a refund), merchant account providers typically charge a “chargeback” fee.

Paperless billing-a cost effective and sustainable solution?

“Eco friendly” and “budget friendly” don’t always go hand in hand. But paperless billing is one of those rare measures that checks both boxes – all while keeping customers happy.  This is simply because getting a bill to a consumer in a traditional way takes lots of time, effort and money that can be avoided. However, by using modern internet technology, the bill issue time can be reduced, the effort to get the bill out can be lessened and costs can be squeezed or in some cases eliminated.

Let’s look a look at some of the specific wins:

Any business of any size or type wins on cost.  On the direct or visible cost side, there’s less paper, less envelopes, less ink, less postage. Even though these are often significant in and of themselves there are also big potential cost reductions on the indirect or more hidden side of things...less customer support (handling queries or phone-in payments) and much less time spent on reconciliation. In addition, online bill presentment and payment has been shown to lead to much quicker settlement by the customer-which substantially aids cash-flow for a merchant. All these savings add up.

The customer wins – This includes eliminating or simplifying the tasks of organising bills, querying them and being able to make payments (all being possible safely and securely at a single web site typically with a few clicks). Paper free means more free time for the bill payer, and less to worry about when dealing with paper (including having to put the bill or invoice somewhere safe, finding it when needed and even losing it occasionally).

The environment wins.  Paperless billing is a simple but significant step that every business can take with a little focus, effort and determination.  Less paper means less use of trees and less transportation (and petrol), reducing a merchant’s carbon footprint. Not all customers will be happy to turn off paper immediately but some will and they will slowly encourage the others to do the same.

So Paperless billing  is a worthy goal for all merchants
Whether you’re a large merchant billing tens or hundreds of thousands of customers, or a small business raising a handful of invoices, on-line billing at an aggregation site (such as PaySwyft) is a pain free way to trial the paperless option.

Merchants can raise some or all of their bills online...or test dual billing with late payers and measure the impact on cashflow...or if they prefer, give customers a straight choice: paper or paper free.

Paperless Billing: at a glance:

Merchants are saving money on...

·        Printing paper bills

·        Fulfilment, postage and franking

·        Undeliverable mail

·        Chasing late payments

·        Handling manual payments

·        Archiving paper bills

·        Reconciliation/bill matching

Customers are saving time on...

·        Checking and paying bills

·        Hunting for previous bills

·        Checking funds and means to pay

·        Writing and posting cheques

·        Waiting for a merchant to be open for business

·        Talking to customer services

·        Worrying over lost cheques and late delivery

Will Mobile Phones Become the Dominant Channel for Bill Delivery?

 
There are now a multitude of channels available to customers to pay their bills. These channels include:

1. Print and mail (paper-based)

2. Fax

3. Email with embedded data

4. Data interchange (system-to-system)

5. Email with PDF and/or link to on-line

6. Online (customer portal)

7. Mobile (MMS; HTML; WAP; USSD)

8. Mobile via App

9. Mobile Tablet

10. Emergent technology (via cable TV etc)

 

Only print and mail on the above list existed as an option until around 30 years ago when fax arrived and 25 years ago when email came along (both of which still have quite a strong following today). Data interchange options were mainly evolved and used in the B2B rather than direct Business to customer or B2C space but again are still around today as a strong channel, supported in the main by large international software companies, who have sufficiently large installed volumes to want to protect their position in the billing market.

Web based technology has driven the greatest change in the billing space in the last 10 years or so and seen the emergence of both consumer and merchant portals (for presentment and payment) and the use of mobile technology as 3G and 4G have made the internet available to mobile phones.

 
Even though each of these channels presents a new and perhaps better and more convenient choice to a given customer (and are often presented as the channel to replace earlier channel choices) in reality, they are often just additional options. In other words, consumers have shown time and time again that they like the extra choice but do not necessarily want to be driven too quickly to only one channel (however “efficient and effective” it is presented to be).
 
The implication of customers wanting lots of channel choice to both view and pay their bills is that the same bill may need to be presented and rendered possible to pay in several channels, at least for now.
 
Today’s challenges
Some technology experts are starting to say that customers will be move rapidly away from e-billing to m-billing (m for mobile of course) in the next few years. Modern mobiles can certainly handle very complex tasks today - just look at the hundred of thousands of Apps available for all different platforms. These Apps can do complex tasks, even generating bills “on-the-fly”. A mobile can also handle a simple task such as bill presentment with ease today – in some cases on quite a detailed basis (even though reading it may present quite a challenge!). However, viewing a PDF bill attachment on a mobile (as opposed to a tablet) is often a long scrolling exercise, making it impractical in most cases. There is a solution to this but it needs the biller to solve the problem of displaying their bills in more flexible ways according to the kind of mobile platform to which it is being delivered. In this way, a customer can see a simple version of the way and then “drill into the detail” as they wish when they want to see itemisation. 

However, perhaps all of this is a false dilemma. In the final analysis, customers do not care if a bill is delivered to their computer, their tablet or their mobile (or even all three). In fact, many want to see it delivered in as many ways as possible to allow maximum flexibility, including by email or by PDF attachment and even in the physical mail or fax on some occasions. This multi-channel approach is therefore a customer centric approach. The challenge for billers then is how to provide as many of these channels as possible at the lowest coat possible. In the end there is only one solution to this –use a full digital bill presentment and payment portal such as PaySwyft for example. This not only means that a bill can be sent in all 9 of the current channels above but means that a biller would be well-placed to take advantage of the new emergent technologies that will come along as in the near future.

Ten Ways to Accelerate Cash flow

In today’s tough economic climate all businesses need to pay even more close attention to ensure that cash due from customers flows in as quickly and smoothly as possible. What follows is ten key ways that cash-flow can be accelerated:

1. Send invoice as soon as possible after a product is supplied or a service is rendered, because every day you are late is at least one more day your customer will wait to pay-terms only start once they receive your bill. If it takes a week to get the bills out, on average, that’s a week’s worth of cash-flow. Also, follow up on major invoices to ensure the client has received the invoice. Invoices can often be delayed by an internal authorisation process, or just going astray.

2. Clear and professional looking invoices get taken more seriously. Make sure that they therefore contain all the information such as the correct entity name, right address etc with clear ways to pay listed.

3. Set fair and appropriate credit terms and communicate these clearly with a ‘due date’ very visible on the invoice. You may even want to set the payment expectations of new customers with a specific welcome letter.

4. Deposit all payments made immediately (especially when these are cheques or cash). The more these can get into a bank account quickly the better.

5. Offer several payment methods not just one or two -customers should never have an excuse for late payment related to your lack of convenient payment options-all customers today (small and large) need to be given choices.

6. Offer early payment discounts so long as it doesn’t swallow up all the profit. If customers are struggling, the sooner you provide the facility to partially pay, the sooner the debt is paid. If a customer exceeds their terms, you can offer cash on delivery terms until the account is back on track.

7. In order to remind customers when to pay, you need a system to let you know when they are due. A series of email/SMS messages, depending upon the time overdue with relevant wording, is often very useful.

8. A great target or key performance indicator for accounts receivables is ‘accounts receivable days’. This is not to be confused with the terms you offer customers. The ‘accounts receivable days’ is the average number of days that all customers are taking to pay you. Of course you want this to be on terms or better.

9. Use you improved cash flow practices to reduce your overdraft or “float” thus saving interest costs or giving you extra cash to spend elsewhere.

10. Aim to do as much of the above as possible online at a flexible and versatile bill presentment and payment web site (such as payswyft.com). Not only will clearly presented electronic bills arrive much quicker but research suggests that customers pay 35% quicker when they receive an online bill and can pay it online on the same web site.

Sites like PaySwyft also automatically bundle many of the above steps in the technology or give an organisation a range of options to help accelerate cash-flow.

Ultimately, if you can entrench these steps into your payment strategy and operational practices you will find accounts receivables less of a hassle, resulting in greatly improved cash-flow for your business.

Finding and Using the Right Invoice Template

If you type “free invoice template” into the Google search engine you get about 40 million returned results. Clearly then there is a lot of interest in trying to find and use an effective invoice process (and ideally a cheap or free one) so in this article we will explore what is available and what options appear to deliver the greatest benefits.

Whether you are a one person business or a giant multi-national, getting an invoice to a customer is the beginning a long process in getting paid. Hence, it is important to get this invoice to a customer quickly (once a product has been supplied or service rendered) but it is equally critical that it is clear and encourages the earliest possible payment.

Fifty years ago, hand-written or simply typed invoices sent through the mail were the norm. Today, we have many other options (although these old-fashioned practices have far from disappeared completely). Perhaps the simplest of these is to use an pre-designed template and popular desk top applications like word for windows and an excel spreadsheet package both have several design alternatives to choose from. In both cases these provide a well-designed looking invoices and provide prompt space for particular customer names, address details, product or services provided and the cost involved. They even allow space for logos to be added if desired. 

Outside the standard templates of desktop applications, there are many relatively cheap and even free software packages which allow invoices to be generated. These work in similar ways to desktop templates but may also generate sequential numbers and allow better storage and retrieval (and avoid the mistake prone process of overtyping the last invoice that was typed).

In both of the above alternatives, the problem is that despite the fact that the invoice can be sent by email as an attachment is still only received as a piece of paper (which the customer can do little with when they receive it and may only print in order to later pay in any case).  As a result, perhaps the best alternative of all is to use a bill presentment service which renders the invoice as a full digital bill. This allows individuals to click on an electronic bill at a web site (ideally rendered in graphical form as they would expect to see it as it appears when posted) and either reveal more bill detail, store it, end it on to someone else to review and most importantly to pay it.

For example, at the PaySwyft web site (www.payswyft.com) sole traders, partnership and companies or all sizes can click on the “free invoice template link” on the home page and use the system to generate an invoice at no cost whatsoever. Like the options described above it provides an clear and clean process for entering invoice details but this is rendered as a full digital bill, meaning that it can be clicked on dynamically to see as much detail as has been entered and perhaps more importantly, it can be paid from within the browser, also electronically. The added bonus here is that the single invoice can then be used (when saved) as a template to generate future invoices much more quickly (because a logo has been added and the design of the overall invoice is relatively set).

What is the difference between “push” versus “pull” on-line billing?

The terms “push” and “pull” are now commonly mentioned when on-line billing is being described, but what do these terms actually mean in this context and what is the advantages of one over the other? 

A “push” based on-line billing process essentially means that a consumer is prompted or alerted directly with a full invoice, statement or other document describing what has been purchased and what needs to be paid. This is therefore what is commonly called a “rich” document. For the most part, push-based on-line billing systems are carried out as e-mail notifications with attachment files (such as a PDF for example).

A “pull” based on-line billing process will still alert a consumer that an invoice is ready to be paid but instead of including the rich document, invites the consumer to go to a nominated web site where they can find the full bill to be viewed and subsequently be paid in digital form.  Both e-mail and text messaging can be used to simply alert the customer, but merchants may elect to use off-line notifications (letters, paper-based invoices etc) as well.

Both push and pull models on online billing offer merchants the opportunity to reduce or eliminate paper invoices over time but each has advantages and disadvantages.

The advantages and disadvantages or Push-based on-line billing
Push based on-lined billing has the advantage of using a very common and familiar system that most businesses and consumers now use with relative ease -their email. Recipient addresses are unique and go straight into an inbox to be read either immediately or when the person opens their email system. In addition, emails are now readily received on mobile phones and other portable devices, allowing for very fast delivery, flexible viewing and (in some cases) access to online payment options.

Despite the above, there are a number of drawbacks with this push-based delivery model. They include:
* An email address may be incorrect or not reach the right recipient directly
* Many individuals and even organisations may have inbox restrictions the size of incoming emails. This will limit the opportunities for presenting invoices (especially when the attachment is large in size).
* Staff turnover in businesses and changes to email addresses by consumers means that it is often difficult to ensure the complete integrity of email addresses.
* Recipients can claim that they never received an email with an attached e-bill
* It is not always easy to differentiate copy invoices from original invoices with push on-line billing.
* An attachment (such as a PDF) is still only a piece of paper. A consumer may just print it and pay it offline and/or a merchant cannot easily reconcile the data (needing to key in the data again).

The advantages and disadvantages or Pull-based on-line billing
In Pull-based on-line billing, an email is more equivalent to a paper-based notification in the physical mail and simply serves to alert the customer that an invoice is available for viewing and processing at the nominated billing website (the biller’s own or a third-party aggregator’s one). As well as presenting the invoice a fully digital and therefore clickable format, web 2.0 internet technology also makes it possible to distinguish between the original and copy invoice. In addition, this fully digital format makes for very simple upload or transfer to an accounting system, thus eliminating any requirement to key in data manually and greatly aiding the reconciliation process. In addition, full digitisation allows the recipients to view their bill and render payments all on-line, at the same web site (which they may choose to do as soon as it is received).

Just as with Push based on-line billing, there are nonetheless a number of drawbacks with this pull-based delivery model. They include:
* Recipients may forget their logins and passwords to the billing web site to which they are being directed
* Recipients may not trust the web site to which they are being sent, or least feel nervous about the security offered (especially where payments are concerned)
* Consumers may be confused with what is likely to be a simplified bill or one which approximates to the one they receive in the mail-it is often similar but not the same.
* The billing web site may not be very user-friendly (leading to consumer abandonment)

So, in summary, we can say that both push and pull on-line billing have many advantages worth considering but also have a range of disadvantages that need to be considered one-by-one according to each merchant’s needs. In overall terms perhaps there are less onerous disadvantages on the “pull” side, and it is this approach consequently has the present advantage. However, as usual in the online world, choice and convenience are always key considerations, and it may well be that offering both a push and a pull-based solution offers the best outcome of all (and most quickly attains the paperless system than many merchants may crave).