Ten Ways to Accelerate Cash flow

In today’s tough economic climate all businesses need to pay even more close attention to ensure that cash due from customers flows in as quickly and smoothly as possible. What follows is ten key ways that cash-flow can be accelerated:

1. Send invoice as soon as possible after a product is supplied or a service is rendered, because every day you are late is at least one more day your customer will wait to pay-terms only start once they receive your bill. If it takes a week to get the bills out, on average, that’s a week’s worth of cash-flow. Also, follow up on major invoices to ensure the client has received the invoice. Invoices can often be delayed by an internal authorisation process, or just going astray.

2. Clear and professional looking invoices get taken more seriously. Make sure that they therefore contain all the information such as the correct entity name, right address etc with clear ways to pay listed.

3. Set fair and appropriate credit terms and communicate these clearly with a ‘due date’ very visible on the invoice. You may even want to set the payment expectations of new customers with a specific welcome letter.

4. Deposit all payments made immediately (especially when these are cheques or cash). The more these can get into a bank account quickly the better.

5. Offer several payment methods not just one or two -customers should never have an excuse for late payment related to your lack of convenient payment options-all customers today (small and large) need to be given choices.

6. Offer early payment discounts so long as it doesn’t swallow up all the profit. If customers are struggling, the sooner you provide the facility to partially pay, the sooner the debt is paid. If a customer exceeds their terms, you can offer cash on delivery terms until the account is back on track.

7. In order to remind customers when to pay, you need a system to let you know when they are due. A series of email/SMS messages, depending upon the time overdue with relevant wording, is often very useful.

8. A great target or key performance indicator for accounts receivables is ‘accounts receivable days’. This is not to be confused with the terms you offer customers. The ‘accounts receivable days’ is the average number of days that all customers are taking to pay you. Of course you want this to be on terms or better.

9. Use you improved cash flow practices to reduce your overdraft or “float” thus saving interest costs or giving you extra cash to spend elsewhere.

10. Aim to do as much of the above as possible online at a flexible and versatile bill presentment and payment web site (such as payswyft.com). Not only will clearly presented electronic bills arrive much quicker but research suggests that customers pay 35% quicker when they receive an online bill and can pay it online on the same web site.

Sites like PaySwyft also automatically bundle many of the above steps in the technology or give an organisation a range of options to help accelerate cash-flow.

Ultimately, if you can entrench these steps into your payment strategy and operational practices you will find accounts receivables less of a hassle, resulting in greatly improved cash-flow for your business.

Finding and Using the Right Invoice Template

If you type “free invoice template” into the Google search engine you get about 40 million returned results. Clearly then there is a lot of interest in trying to find and use an effective invoice process (and ideally a cheap or free one) so in this article we will explore what is available and what options appear to deliver the greatest benefits.

Whether you are a one person business or a giant multi-national, getting an invoice to a customer is the beginning a long process in getting paid. Hence, it is important to get this invoice to a customer quickly (once a product has been supplied or service rendered) but it is equally critical that it is clear and encourages the earliest possible payment.

Fifty years ago, hand-written or simply typed invoices sent through the mail were the norm. Today, we have many other options (although these old-fashioned practices have far from disappeared completely). Perhaps the simplest of these is to use an pre-designed template and popular desk top applications like word for windows and an excel spreadsheet package both have several design alternatives to choose from. In both cases these provide a well-designed looking invoices and provide prompt space for particular customer names, address details, product or services provided and the cost involved. They even allow space for logos to be added if desired. 

Outside the standard templates of desktop applications, there are many relatively cheap and even free software packages which allow invoices to be generated. These work in similar ways to desktop templates but may also generate sequential numbers and allow better storage and retrieval (and avoid the mistake prone process of overtyping the last invoice that was typed).

In both of the above alternatives, the problem is that despite the fact that the invoice can be sent by email as an attachment is still only received as a piece of paper (which the customer can do little with when they receive it and may only print in order to later pay in any case).  As a result, perhaps the best alternative of all is to use a bill presentment service which renders the invoice as a full digital bill. This allows individuals to click on an electronic bill at a web site (ideally rendered in graphical form as they would expect to see it as it appears when posted) and either reveal more bill detail, store it, end it on to someone else to review and most importantly to pay it.

For example, at the PaySwyft web site (www.payswyft.com) sole traders, partnership and companies or all sizes can click on the “free invoice template link” on the home page and use the system to generate an invoice at no cost whatsoever. Like the options described above it provides an clear and clean process for entering invoice details but this is rendered as a full digital bill, meaning that it can be clicked on dynamically to see as much detail as has been entered and perhaps more importantly, it can be paid from within the browser, also electronically. The added bonus here is that the single invoice can then be used (when saved) as a template to generate future invoices much more quickly (because a logo has been added and the design of the overall invoice is relatively set).

What is the difference between “push” versus “pull” on-line billing?

The terms “push” and “pull” are now commonly mentioned when on-line billing is being described, but what do these terms actually mean in this context and what is the advantages of one over the other? 

A “push” based on-line billing process essentially means that a consumer is prompted or alerted directly with a full invoice, statement or other document describing what has been purchased and what needs to be paid. This is therefore what is commonly called a “rich” document. For the most part, push-based on-line billing systems are carried out as e-mail notifications with attachment files (such as a PDF for example).

A “pull” based on-line billing process will still alert a consumer that an invoice is ready to be paid but instead of including the rich document, invites the consumer to go to a nominated web site where they can find the full bill to be viewed and subsequently be paid in digital form.  Both e-mail and text messaging can be used to simply alert the customer, but merchants may elect to use off-line notifications (letters, paper-based invoices etc) as well.

Both push and pull models on online billing offer merchants the opportunity to reduce or eliminate paper invoices over time but each has advantages and disadvantages.

The advantages and disadvantages or Push-based on-line billing
Push based on-lined billing has the advantage of using a very common and familiar system that most businesses and consumers now use with relative ease -their email. Recipient addresses are unique and go straight into an inbox to be read either immediately or when the person opens their email system. In addition, emails are now readily received on mobile phones and other portable devices, allowing for very fast delivery, flexible viewing and (in some cases) access to online payment options.

Despite the above, there are a number of drawbacks with this push-based delivery model. They include:
* An email address may be incorrect or not reach the right recipient directly
* Many individuals and even organisations may have inbox restrictions the size of incoming emails. This will limit the opportunities for presenting invoices (especially when the attachment is large in size).
* Staff turnover in businesses and changes to email addresses by consumers means that it is often difficult to ensure the complete integrity of email addresses.
* Recipients can claim that they never received an email with an attached e-bill
* It is not always easy to differentiate copy invoices from original invoices with push on-line billing.
* An attachment (such as a PDF) is still only a piece of paper. A consumer may just print it and pay it offline and/or a merchant cannot easily reconcile the data (needing to key in the data again).

The advantages and disadvantages or Pull-based on-line billing
In Pull-based on-line billing, an email is more equivalent to a paper-based notification in the physical mail and simply serves to alert the customer that an invoice is available for viewing and processing at the nominated billing website (the biller’s own or a third-party aggregator’s one). As well as presenting the invoice a fully digital and therefore clickable format, web 2.0 internet technology also makes it possible to distinguish between the original and copy invoice. In addition, this fully digital format makes for very simple upload or transfer to an accounting system, thus eliminating any requirement to key in data manually and greatly aiding the reconciliation process. In addition, full digitisation allows the recipients to view their bill and render payments all on-line, at the same web site (which they may choose to do as soon as it is received).

Just as with Push based on-line billing, there are nonetheless a number of drawbacks with this pull-based delivery model. They include:
* Recipients may forget their logins and passwords to the billing web site to which they are being directed
* Recipients may not trust the web site to which they are being sent, or least feel nervous about the security offered (especially where payments are concerned)
* Consumers may be confused with what is likely to be a simplified bill or one which approximates to the one they receive in the mail-it is often similar but not the same.
* The billing web site may not be very user-friendly (leading to consumer abandonment)

So, in summary, we can say that both push and pull on-line billing have many advantages worth considering but also have a range of disadvantages that need to be considered one-by-one according to each merchant’s needs. In overall terms perhaps there are less onerous disadvantages on the “pull” side, and it is this approach consequently has the present advantage. However, as usual in the online world, choice and convenience are always key considerations, and it may well be that offering both a push and a pull-based solution offers the best outcome of all (and most quickly attains the paperless system than many merchants may crave). 

What is the real cost of paper-based versus electronic billing

This might seem to be quite a simple question at face value but when we think about it, the answer is not exactly a straightforward one. This is because we are not always aware of the real costs of performing this quite complex task in all of its steps. In addition, while direct or tangible costs are relatively easy to identify, indirect costs are less easily identifiable and some of these are often very well hidden. Let’s therefore look at what tends to fall into these three categories of costs when comparing traditional paper-based billing versus full on-line or digital billing.

Direct Costs
At face value most people would estimate that a few “direct” costs are involved in paper-based billing. These may include:
•Invoice bill/file preparation/printing
•Paper invoices/bills
•Printing (ink or cartridge replacement)
•Envelopes
•Postage/Franking
•Offering basic payment options (debit, credit, other at standard fees)
Costs will fall as bill volumes increase for most of the above but even if they do postage or franking at about £0.40 to £0.45 pence will always be the biggest fee here. And the others will typically add as much as 30 to 35 pence making for a total of £0.70 to £0.80 of direct costs. Of course, if a merchant emails invoices (with a PDF attachment), instead of physically mailing them this may fall in half perhaps.

Indirect Costs
Costs are often deemed to be “indirect” because they are either fixed and/or cannot be wholly charged to the billing costs (especially if it is only part of a person’s job). However, even proportional costs add up here. Indirect costs may include:
•Customer service manpower to handle calls/queries
•Accounting/Reconciliation manpower
•Lost invoices (and the time taken to deal with this)
•Undelivered bills (and the time taken to deal with this)
•The cost of bill storage (space rental or fixed costs)
•Bill query handling time
Once again there may be some economies of scale in the above but all of these items (except bill storage perhaps) mainly involve having staff on the payroll or at call. Even at 500 bills a month, at least quarter a person would typically be involved in issuing and reconciling invoices and another quarter in handling queries, re-issuing bills or handling “special requests” related to invoicing or payments. If the cost of this person (or two part-timers) were £12,000 a year (£8,000 plus 50% salary/overhead burden) or £6,000 each, this £1,000 a month would amount to £2 per bill.

Hidden Costs
Costs are often deemed to be “hidden” because no-one is scrutinising or controlling them (they go unmeasured or unaccounted for or are lost in general overhead or the broad costs of doing business). Hidden costs may include:
•Extra or hidden payment transaction fees (which may be fixed or higher than necessary)
•Invoice/billing run or payment processing errors
•The need for a higher than wanted or necessary float/overdraft at the bank
•Possible added customers or more business from having more payment options
•Quicker settlement/cycle time (by use of SMS or email alerts)
•Easier training of staff/opportunity to focus staff elsewhere with time saved
•Potential cash-flow acceleration
•Easier/cheaper compliance and audit work with digital billing
•Lower/No cost digital marketing opportunities
•Overall incremental "Green" benefits/credits

The benefits to an organisation of the long list above are obviously much harder to calculate but a variety of studies in recent years have suggested that these can conservatively add up to as much as 3-4% of revenues or as much as 15% of profit. If we assume our little company doing 500 bills a month has an average transaction or “ticket” value of £40, turnover per month is £20,000 or £240,000 per annum. If we assume that profit is 15% of this or £36,000, this all means that the cost per bill is somewhere between £0.90 to £1.20.

So in summary, if we add all of these costs together which have a total traditional or paper-based billing cost of £3.60 to £4 or 9.5% of the revenue collected each time (£40 average ticket value). Now that’s a quite a serious amount of money for this little company not to take pretty seriously! But what about your company?-what is 9.5% of your revenues? And when you have calculated it in cold hard cash, can you afford not to investigate the potential to save as much as half of this as recurrent savings every year by moving to digital billing?

Developing a Payment Strategy-Step 5- Building a seamless payments process.

In exploring what is involved in developing an overall payments strategy, in this fifth and final article in the series we will look at building a seamless payments process.

There is no “one-size-fit-all” payment strategy for every organisation, as there will be many individual factors to be taken into account in every case, and this is likely to affect the choices made. However, one aspect about a payments process appears to have almost universal appeal when it comes to customers-they want a “seamless” experience as much as possible. “Seamless” means without joins or to be continuous or even “flowing” from one stage in the process to the next. For a payments process this entails that every step needs to flow in this smooth way to ensure that the customer experience is a straightforward and relatively painless one (given that few people probably like actually paying bills).

Research again and again confirms that flexibility and choice should be a major driver in making the customer experience a positive one, when it comes to rendering payment and the web can now deliver much of this with a little careful pre-planning. In practice, this suggests that the entire payment strategy can be centred around an Internet web site (whether this is in-house or an third-party one). On this site, all the payments process steps of issuing the invoice, offering various payment channels, taking different kinds of payments, reconciling payments to invoices, banking the payments and accounting for the whole payment transaction are possible-a one-stop shop. Of course, some customers either will not or cannot transact on the web and the organisation may therefore have to continue to physically send, email or SMS invoices and even accept telephone based or postal payments. The key issue here however is that this population of customers can be kept to a minimum and encouraged to transition over time. For example, those people making telephone payments can be shown how easy it is to do make the same recurrent payment online (especially when the convenience of doing so 24/7 and 365 days a year is appreciated and not just when call centre lines are open for instance).

In summary then, all organisations of all sizes and types should develop and continue to hone a payments strategy that offers more flexibility and choice to customers. In the chosen approach, being fast and efficient in making the bill available is critical, as is making the whole experience as user-friendly as possible. By doing this, an organisation will usually get the change pioneers and early adopters to experiment with the new approach, and it is their experience that that will have a “viral” influence on those customers who do not like to be the first to try new things. Organisations therefore have to be patient and take a long-term view, but in doing so, can drive both bill presentment and payment acceptance costs down substantially.

Developing a Payment Strategy-Step 4- Making as much payment choice available as possible.

In exploring what is involved in developing an overall payments strategy, in this article we will look at the fourth phase of five in total, which is making as much payment choice available to customers as possible.

Every organisation wants to get paid (and as quickly as possible) but there are clearly many ways in which this may be done by customers. This creates an interesting dilemma. On the one hand, by keeping payment choices to a minimum, complexity is reduced for the organisation but flexibility of options is decreased for the customer. On the other hand, a wide array of payment options creates high customer choice but with a high degree of handling complexity for the business. In the past, the size of the average transaction, the billing cycle frequency and the volume were the main determinants of strategy here (and may have favoured fewer payment choices such as cheque and direct debit only for instance as a way of keeping things simple and processing costs low) but with the more widespread use of the Internet for payments in recent years, the balance towards greater customer payment option choice has become much easier and therefore compelling. 

Offering a wider choice of payments incorporates not only varying payment channels but also a variety of payment types. Different channels include the traditional ones of mailed-in cheques and direct bank transfer (direct debit or standing order) but these days can often also include operating a central call centre (in-house or outsourced), automated telephone services or payment via the web (at a company built or third-party site). Different types of payment include cheque, cash and bank transfer, but can be easily extended to a wide variety of credit and debit cards, pre-paid cards and e-wallet transfers.

Internet technology now allows considerable flexibility for an organisation of any size to offer most of the above channels with a web site at the hub of the offering. In addition, an e-payment gateway can now be relatively easily added to enable credit side and debit side, options, as well as e-wallet payments to be taken online. Perhaps even more attractive to an organisation is adding a reputable third-party electronic billing and payment aggregation destination site (such as PaySwyft) as an offering in the overall mix. At such a site, an organisation can present all of its bills in digital form and then allow these bills to be paid with almost every available payment type, including cash in many cases. Because the aggregator takes the payments, collects them together electronically and then settles to its merchants online also, this helps to drive down the internal expense of payment call handling and the acceptance and reconciliation costs of handling cheques (and any other paper-based transactions).

Whatever approach selected by an organisation, today’s customers prefer a variety of payment options to be available meet their different and often changing needs when it comes to paying invoices. The reward for making this available is quicker settlement and thereby accelerated cash-flow. A wise business therefore finds the most cost-effective ways to offer as much choice as they can.

In our next article in this series, we will look at the next phase in developing the Payment Strategy- Building a seamless payments process.

Developing a Payment Strategy-Step 3- Giving customers as user-friendly a billing and payment experience as possible.

In exploring what is involved in developing an overall payments strategy, in this article we will look at the third phase of five in total, which is giving customers as user-friendly a billing and payment experience as possible.

Most dictionaries suggest that user-friendliness involves making a customer process as easy to learn and operate as possible. In practical terms, this often boils down to making sure that language is straightforward and unambiguous. In a web site environment, this will mean making sure that screens are clean and uncluttered, and navigation is both speedy and efficient etc. However, when it comes to a relatively uninteresting task such as receiving and paying bills, it is suggested that the key to user-friendliness is clarity, convenience, choice and control. Let’s therefore look at each of these in a little more detail

Clarity
Many organisations confuse their customers by either failing to let them know clearly how payment can be made for products or services supplied, or bury the information in places where it cannot easily be found (or is difficult to understand when a customer does stumble across it). Customers need simple and clear language about where how they can receive a bill and where, when and how they can pay that bill. In a web site, “ways to pay” is often therefore a simple addition (as a page or a tab) especially when they can click a link and make a payment there and then.

Convenience
In general, convenience is something that increases comfort or saves work. When it comes to billing or payment therefore, the offered approach should allow greater comfort (being able to complete the whole task on line, at home, on a mobile etc) or less work (do it quicker, without having to rely on the physical mail, avoid paper-based copying/storage etc). This might also involve a more convenient web site experience (less clicks, more clickable options or deeper/better analysis when needed).

Choice
All customers like to have choices available (whether or not they use them). In bill presentment and payment, this typically means allowing customers to view their bill in flexible ways. In a web site, this might include the ability to view a mini bill or clickable bill detail. On the payment side, choice involves providing different payment mechanisms. We will look at this issue in more detail in step 4 of this series but in summary this should ideally include as many debit and credit side options as possible so that customers can settle a bill in a way that suits them (which they are more likely to do much more quickly when several choices are made available to them).

Control
According to recent research, customers will pay between 10 and 17 bills a month and may not feel that they are very much in control when these arrive at different times in the mail, are chased frequently and may specify few ways for payment to be made. Using online technology to both issue bills and allowed them to be paid flexibly is one way to overcome many of these frustrations and this has other advantages. In an online bill and payment environment, customers can store their bills electronically (and retrieve them when wanted) can calendarise payment to suit them, get immediate receipt of payment (giving the confidence and security that settlement has occurred) and can analyse bill data whenever and however they like. This all helps the customer feel that they are more in control.

In our next article in this series, we will look at the next phase in developing the Payment Strategy- making as much payment choice available as possible to customers.

Developing a Payment Strategy-Step 2- Focusing on how to issue bills and invoices in a fast and efficiency way

In exploring what is involved in developing an overall payments strategy, in this article we will look at the second phase of five in total, which is how a business can issue bills and invoices in a the fastest and most efficiency way.

There are few businesses that fail to readily appreciate that when a customer orders a product or service, they expect to have it delivered as efficiently as possible (and this usually means fast). In fact, some organisations even seek to gain competitive advantage by doing this effectively. However, this would be costly unless the invoicing process is equally efficient, so that payment can be collected as quickly as possible. Streamlining the billing process is therefore a critical activity.

There are essentially three options available to streamline the billing process:

First, a business can seek to make an existing manual bill process “flow” more efficiently. For example, this might involve looking at the simplicity of the invoice design or layout, reducing or even eliminating wasteful work tasks, or even further automating the delivery process (such as faster envelope stuffing). Although this may help considerably, the danger is that these process improvements need to be “locked in” to avoid slippage and the changes may only go a short way in terms of overall improvement from a customer perspective.

A second option is to automate the manual billing process as much as possible. For example, this might involve adopting an email-based invoice delivery process (saving on paper, envelopes and franking (if the customer can be convinced to accept an email as the substitute of course). This can save considerably in direct costs and gets the bill to the customer earlier than the physical mail. However, the business is still delivering paper and may not experience much in the way of faster payment. In fact many organisations find that they end up maintaining both their physical mailing and emailing process (and storing more paper than they did before).

A third option is for a business is to let a third-party specialist billing organisation help to streamline the process. One possibility here is to completely outsource the process of both billing and payment collection. However, a more popular option is to either buy full bill automation software from the third-party (and pay for its maintenance and use) or to use a digital billing service. The latter choice is likely to deliver the most change from a customer perspective. Here, a customer’s bill is made available to view at the third party’s dedicated web site, where they can then pay it by a variety of means (on both the credit and debit side).

Each of the above options needs careful consideration, as all three involve time and cost. However, in terms of savings in direct and indirect cost, option three is likely to be the most efficient and cost effective.

In our next article in this series, we will look at the next phase in developing the Payment Strategy- Giving customers as user-friendly billing and payment experience as possible.

Developing a Payment Strategy-Step 1-Appreciating why it critical to have a payments strategy?

This blog article seeks to explore what is involved in developing a payments strategy and it will therefore look in more detail at the first phase of five in total, which is determining why it is critical to have a payments strategy at all.

First of all let’s just define what the payments strategy needs to encompass and then determine why this is so important.

All businesses know that continuing revenue or positive cash-flow is their “life-blood” but few of these have a strategy or even a loose plan to ensure that this keeps flowing appropriately (by which we mean steadily and at a greater rate than costs are incurred). Revenue (as opposed to money from borrowings or equity) only comes in when a business bills for its products and services to its customers and when it receives payment in its bank account. As a result, the process that is used for up-front billing all the way through to the steps to finally collect payment need to operate efficiently and effectively-and this is not something that you want to simply let evolve (or leave to chance).

Whatever its size, a business should spend just as much time on its Payments strategy as it does on its Marketing strategy or Operations strategy. This is simply because all three of these strategies have to work together in order to be successful. Marketing and Sales create demand and get customers to buy in the first place (and will usually spend up-front money in doing so). Operations will fulfil the demand by delivering goods and services (once again spending money to do so). Finally then Accounting and Finance are charged with collecting money from customers, but need to do so in the best possible way (with as much choice as possible) and fast enough to ensure that money is well managed at all times (however seasonal or “lumpy” sales might be).

The first step in developing a Payments strategy, that balances all if the above well, is to understand the full billing to payment cycle. This cycle typically includes: preparing the invoice, issuing the invoice, offering payment channels, taking different kinds of payments, reconciling payments to invoices, banking payments and accounting for the whole payment transaction. In addition to these 7 core steps it might also include, tracking invoice and payment progress, dealing with queries and complaints and producing analysis and reports on payment transactions. Every one of these steps is a significant process by itself and therefore needs to operate smoothly on a stand-alone basis and as part of the overall process. A good Payment Strategy will therefore seek to specify how this can best be done at each step and in an overall manner.

In our next article in this series of five we will look at the next phase in developing the Payment Strategy- how to issue bills and invoices in a fast and efficiency way.

Is online Direct Debit a “Win-Win” for Everyone?

Direct Debit or Direct deposit as it is called in some countries has been around for decades now and making steady inroads as a payment method offered these days by many large merchants, often with incentives (such as vouchers or money off a bill) to customers to sign a direct debit mandate. Merchants who are part of the Direct Debit scheme (called Originators) claim that the service not only saves time and hassle for customers in general, but also that it facilitates easier scheduling, easier storage, is more secure, involves less cheques and reduces errors. Of course, both the merchants and the banks also gain these same benefits, not to mention the capacity to reach into a customer’s bank account directly to collect payment for a bill (something that a customer is not always completely happy about).

Despite its steady progress, Direct Debit’s growth has slowed until very recently, when on-line billing and/or payment portals have come into being and offered to speed up quite an old-fashioned process, in which a paper-based form still had to be sent in and signed before service could commence (and the whole process repeated when a direct debit amount changed). These new portals (such as the one at www.Payswyft.com as an example) not only offer traditional benefits to consumers (shown in the table below to the right-the top 4) but adds new customer benefits that are only possible online (shown in the 5 blue italics items in the right column below). The online portal therefore gives consumers even more reason to either use direct debit some of the time or use it as their primary payment channel.

Banks and Originators win too
It’s always critical for a customer to gain substantive advantage with a payment service of any kind but it is even better if the service provider can win at the same time. In the two columns to the left above are therefore the advantages gained by both the banks and the originators/merchants by pushing direct debit as a payment option. For the banks the primary advantage is that online direct debit payments reduce data entry time and staff, but not far behind is the new revenue possibility of opening up new markets (e.g. smaller merchants being introduced to the scheme). For the originators the primary advantage is that it helps to retain customers, who typically like all their payment history to be available at the portal. Just as important though is the cash-flow benefit. Direct debit payers almost always pay on time (and many pay early). No more cheques in the mail on the last possible day.

Summary
Direct debit is not a new service but online billing and/or payment portals such as PaySwyft offer even more reasons for everyone to gain the benefit of using this payment channel.

Can Merchants really turn off paper bills with digital billing?

Within the billing world, going paperless has been almost like a “Holy Grail” for many merchants, and especially those who are sending out thousands, hundreds of thousands or even millions of bills a month in some cases. And who can blame them? Merchants who send out more than just a few hundred invoices each month are typically spending a great deal of money on printing, putting invoices into envelopes, sending out reminders and/or statements, franking the envelope, having to engage in making sure bills are filed or stored properly and fielding calls from customers who don’t receive a the bill in the mail at all (so it has to be resent) to name but a few things.

By adopting a paperless invoice or digital bill only solution, a merchant can technically avoid all of the above and “switch off paper” immediately. However, despite the apparent significant  advantages to the merchant, this may not be the best way to go (and it should also not be the driver of the change to digital billing).

Most customers have been getting bills in the mail, or at least ones they can print if they are sent by email, for many years and many want to stick with a process that they well understand. Hence, any merchant that removes the option of receiving a paper bill risks losing a customer’s business altogether. Far better therefore to retain the option to receive a physical bill and either deliver it by cost-effective e-mail or allow a customer to retrieve it and print it for themselves from a central website.

With a cloud-based system such as PaySwyft, not only can any merchant post a digital bill but allow customers to print the bill whenever they like. Even better a merchant can email the bill if they so wish, including follow-up or chase bills. And once customers are using such a fully digital portal they can also use a whole range of convenient technology to manage their bill in more flexible ways. This includes:

• Receiving a monthly e-mail notification when a new invoice is available to view.
• Decreasing the possibility of mail fraud and identity theft.
• Automatically calendarising or secheduling payments at a time or date to suit them
• Set email and/or SMS alerts as they like
• Store and retrieve all invoice and payment records whenever they like, forever
• Make payment 24 hours a day, 365 days a year
• Pay in a multitude of ways at the same portal and get a receipt there and then
• See all of their invoices and payments when they want
• Analyse invoice trends and patterns as they wish

This does not mean that they will necessarily “turn off” the paper bill, or stop printing it, but over time the resistance to doing so will clearly lessen. And in the meantime, not only is the customer getting a convenient service for free, that they can use at work or home on their computer (and save themselves time if they were previously paying by cash or cheque in particular), but a merchant is saving money on many fronts, including fielding less phone calls, accelerating cash-flow with earlier online payments and reconciling payments in a much more straightforward way than ever before. Given all of this, getting to a paperless world, if and when it happens, is only a minor bonus.

Will Mobile Phones Become the Dominant Channel for Bill Delivery?

There are now a multitude of channels available to customers to pay their bills. These channels include:
1. Print and mail (paper-based)
2. Fax
3. Email with embedded data
4. Data interchange (system-to-system)
5. Email with PDF and/or link to on-line
6. Customer Web Portal
7. Mobile (MMS; HTML; WAP; USSD)
8. Mobile via App
9. Mobile Tablet
10. Emergent technology (via cable TV etc)

Only print and mail on the above list existed as an option until around 30 years ago when fax arrived and 25 years ago when email came along (both of which still have quite a strong following today). Data interchange options were mainly evolved and used in the B2B rather than direct Business to customer or B2C space but again are still around today as a strong channel, supported in the main by large international software companies, who have sufficiently large installed volumes to want to protect their position in the billing market.

Web based technology has driven the greatest change in the billing space in the last 10 years or so and seen the emergence of both consumer and merchant portals (for presentment and payment) and the use of mobile technology as 3G and 4G have made the internet available to mobile phones.

Even though each of these channels presents a new and perhaps better and more convenient choice to a given customer (and are often presented as the channel to replace earlier channel choices) in reality, they are often just additional options. In other words, consumers have shown time and time again that they like the extra choice but do not necessarily want to be driven too quickly to only one channel (however “efficient and effective” it is presented to be).

The implication of customers wanting lots of channel choice to both view and pay their bills is that the same bill may need to be presented and rendered possible to pay in several channels, at least for now.

Today’s challenges
Some technology experts are starting to say that customers will be move rapidly away from e-billing to m-billing (m for mobile of course) in the next few years. Modern mobiles can certainly handle very complex tasks today - just look at the hundred of thousands of Apps available for all different platforms. These Apps can do complex tasks, even generating bills “on-the-fly”. A mobile can also handle a simple task such as bill presentment with ease today – in some cases on quite a detailed basis (even though reading it may present quite a challenge!). However, viewing a PDF bill attachment on a mobile (as opposed to a tablet) is often a long scrolling exercise, making it impractical in most cases. There is a solution to this but it needs the biller to solve the problem of displaying their bills in more flexible ways according to the kind of mobile platform to which it is being delivered. In this way, a customer can see a simple version of the way and then “drill into the detail” as they wish when they want to see itemisation. 

However, perhaps all of this is a false dilemma. In the final analysis, customers do not care if a bill is delivered to their computer, their tablet or their mobile (or even all three). In fact, many want to see it delivered in as many ways as possible to allow maximum flexibility, including by email or by PDF attachment and even in the physical mail or fax on some occasions. This multi-channel approach is therefore a customer centric approach. The challenge for billers then is how to provide as many of these channels as possible at the lowest cost possible. In the end there is only one solution to this –use a full digital bill presentment and payment portal, such as PaySwyft for example. This not only means that a bill can be sent in all nine of the current channels above (and can be paid at the same portal) but means that a biller would be well-placed to take advantage of the new emergent technologies that will come along in the near future.

Do large organizations spend an average of $25 per invoice to issue a bill and collect payment?

Almost a year ago, one of our blog articles reported that the leading research companies who look at international billing and payment issues on an ongoing basis, (including perhaps the leader in the field of billing research -Billentis) said that on average, the overall cost of sending out a bill or invoice and then collecting payment from the customer, is £17 per invoice or around $25 (based on data in Europe for the year 2010). We also pointed out that many merchants were disbelieving of this figure, suggesting that they spend nowhere near that kind of money on such a mundane and clerical activity.

Although individual merchant data is often difficult to come by, a private study of the billing and collections practices of three very different organizations was made available recently and the data sheds some light on the real costs that are experienced. These three relatively large organizations were an electricity utility, a city/council organization and a regional telecommunications enterprise. All of these are US based and currently bill their customers with a physical bill in the mail. All three offered payment via their web site but take-up is less than 5% of the combined customer base (a total of 540,000 customers across all the organizations that are billed each month).

What did the study show?
These organizations classified their costs of issuing bills and collecting payment into “direct” and “indirect”. Direct costs included:
• Invoice bill/file preparation time
• Bill printing
• Envelopes
• Postage/Franking
• Payment type fees (fees on credit/debit cards etc)
• Bank fees

The estimated average direct cost for these companies was $6.50 per bill

Indirect costs included:
• Customer service manpower to handle calls/queries or take phone payments
• Accounting/Reconciliation time
• Lost invoices (and the time taken to deal with this)
• Undelivered bills (and the time taken to deal with this)
• The cost of bill storage (space rental or fixed costs)
• Bill query handling time
• Additional or extra payment transaction fees that were unexpected
• Invoice/billing run or payment processing errors
• The need for a higher than wanted or necessary financing to cover outstanding receivables
• Slower than expected bill settlements
• Extra costs associated with compliance/regulatory issues

Of the above, the first two items (call-centre and account reconciliation costs) accounted for about 80% of the indirect costs, which on average were stated to be $18.00 per customer invoice.

So in summary, these three companies suggested that their real costs were a total of $24.50 per bill, based on real internal data from the year 2011. At least for these large merchants therefore, the Billentis estimate looks to be pretty accurate and it is even more reason for merchants of all types and sizes to look very carefully at finding ways to reduce these costs. One immediate solution, of course, is to adopt  online digital billing and payment practices by partnering with a third-party bill presentment and payment portal such as PaySwyft (where these costs can be cut in half very quickly).

Security Protection is the Online Billing World

The use of online billing continues to grow but with this growth comes security risks which need to be managed, especially as far as the consumer is concerned. There are a number of useful steps or measures that can be taken by an individual customer who uses online banking or an online bill presentment portal. A few of these measures include the following:
 
1. Use a strong password- Too many people use their birthday or address for passwords that can be readily discovered. It is therefore better to come up withy something unique. A strong password is at least 7 characters long and contains both upper and lowercase letters. It is also helpful to include a number in the string of possible. This reduces the ability of anyone else guessing a consumer’s chosen password and thereby effect any illegal transactions.
 
2. Keep login data hidden away- Account information, such as a login or password or anything else that will help a person trying to commit fraud, should be kept in a very safe place. This is not on a “post it”, note or scrap of paper on your desk, where others may see it, but in a locked draw or a diary that you carry with you at all times. Even in the latter case, you may want to record the data in a way that you understand it but will confuse a third party person.  

3. Review transaction history- Just as we should check our bank account pages for errors and oversights, so we should apply the same level of scrutiny to our online transactions. This should include not only the most recent transactions but also the history to make sure that a fraudulent transaction is not “buried” in the list. Most fraudsters like to steal quietly and invisibly (one line item that is similar in value) so you need to take extra care to spot that purchase you never made or bill you never got.

 
4. Protect your computer- However careful you may be in your online effort to take security seriously you need to keep your hardware secure through the use of up-to-date antivirus software and firewalls to bar intruders from accessing your network or computer. The greatest risk here is file attachments sent to you on email. Always therefore make sure that any files from people you do not know (that make it past your firewall and spam catcher) are deleted (and attachments from them are never opened).
 
5. Sign out- when operating any online accounts, it is highly advisable that when your online session is complete, you sign out immediately and close the browser window you are done, as double security. If you do need to leave your desk in an office unattended for a few minutes, also make sure that you have locked your computer or password protected it so that others cannot log in to an open session.
 
6. Avoid public computers- Although it is often convenient to be able to log in remotely to your account (and this can certainly be done from your own smart phone or tablet computer for example) you should ideally avoid signing into your online billing portal on a public computer like the ones at cyber cafés. This is simply because they may not have good security and may have software on computers which record your login and password information for later use by someone wanting to commit fraud.
 
7. Beware of Email scams- Many fraudsters try to steal the identity of a bank or other financial services institute and send emails requesting personal and confidential information to be provided. Here it is best to simply avoid putting any login or password data into emails.
 
8. Select a trustworthy Portal- before using any online billing and payment system, be sure to check the credibility of the organization you are dealing with. Check that they are certified and check that they have secure socket layer (SSL) payment certificate etc. You can also read user reviews, blog postings and even “Google” the company to see what you can find that may give you any cause for concern.

If you follow these simple guidelines, you will protect your confidentiality and your account and enjoy the many benefits of using an online billing system.

Optimizing the Customer Experience when paying online

Any business, no matter what size or type, needs to pay careful attention to the customer experience when they are asking individuals to visit their web site and pay online (whatever products or services they may be offering).  The focus should therefore be on giving the best possible customer experience and converting first-time visitors in particular to become happy and repeat customers. There are several ways in which businesses can improve things and in this brief article we will be looking at six of the most critical ones.

1. Every site needs to be easy to navigate. Fundamentally, any site structure should be what customer needs, not how the organization wants it to look like for internal purposes. Simple, clear and clean page design (with as little clutter as possible) focused on moving customers toward completion of their goal should be the focus.

2. Make it easy for the customer to pay. Many web sites offering products and/or services seem to be almost embarrassed to mention payment and both hide prices in obscure pages within the site and fail to give site browsers and easy way to check out. And there is no excuse for this approach today. If this is not available as a direct part of the web site design, a redirect or hosted page at which customers can view a bill digitally or make a payment in many ways is available from multiple sources.

3. Communicate product or service offers clearly. Companies need to use clear, concise wording to describe what they are offering. Once again, clear prices are critical, including any extra costs that may be applicable. If this is not the case site browsers are much more likely to abandon the site’s shopping cart (a massive problem for many organizations when they have already done so much work to get a customer so close to buying!).

4. Implement methods to improve your site conversion rate. Conversion rate is the measure how many browsers become buyers.  Conversion rates average 2.5%-3% but rates that reach 8% are not uncommon and some sites report conversion rates of even 20%. The very informative article "How To Sell More on the Web: 30 Tips To Increase Conversion Rates For An Ecommerce Site" will give you several ideas to improve your conversion rate.

5. Manage customers when they are about to abandon their shopping carts. By the time an organization has got a customer into its site shopping cart, they have done the hard work and need to close out with losing them at this last hurdle. Assuming the payment checkout experience has been designed to be a smooth and painless one, one extra step to be taken is to offer direct incentives if a customer still wants to abandon his or her purchase-this may be a further price decrease or more benefits or features (or even additional product or service).

6. Provide incentives to register (and come back). Even the most established web sites are struggling with increasing their goal of building a large pool of repeat customers. On average, it is estimated that 95-97% percent of those who visit sites on average never return, even when they have paid.  To prevent this, provide as much incentive as possible for customers to register so that future emails and alerts can be sent to visit the site again.

Summary

Ultimately, any businesses aiming to succeed online must rise above their resource constraints and strive to provide quality e-service. The above 6 actions sound easy to implement (and they are) but very few organizations bother to spend the time to do so. Any organization that takes the time and makes the above changes to their web site will therefore reap considerable commercial benefits.

Innovation in On-line Billing

Last month the Javelin E-commerce research company released its annual report on who they see to be the “innovators” in the on-line Billing space (at least as it relates to US experience). These are many of the companies that are not the Billers themselves (or merchants with the facility to render a bill directly at their own web site and to readily accept online payment at the same site) and the Banks and/or Credit Unions (or what Javelin calls FI’s) who offer an online BillPay service to their customers.

Let’s start with a few quotes from the report:
“A number of innovative companies are seeking to overhaul and streamline the chore of paying bills with services that potentially could steal market share from the dominant models of paying bills at Financial Institutions (FI)s or directly at biller sites. Success for the upstarts will not come easily or soon, however. These innovators not only are competing against one another in a crowded field with piecemeal offerings, their survival will depend on changing entrenched consumer habits for paying bills at FIs, at biller sites, and by mail.”

“Billpay innovators have the potential — at least on paper — to offer a package that combines or exceeds the strengths of FI bill pay and the biller‐direct model. Those strengths include the ability to view and pay all bills in one place, oversee all account balances in one place, pay from any account at any FI, and file away documents from all sources.”

“BillPay Innovators lack the necessary four-part combo: money management, bill‐pay capabilities, archives, and mobile access. To convince consumers that they are a compelling bill‐pay alternative, innovators must offer a package that combines the control of money management, the practicality of bill pay, access and control via mobile devices, and the convenience and security of electronic archives.”

In summary then, Javelin concludes that independent online billing companies may have a possibly disruptive influence in the future, but it’s not yet happened, it will take a long time, the impact will be small, consumer habits will be difficult to change, the new functionality that will be available is not that compelling and there is a lot of competition rendering the effort relatively unprofitable. In other words, this is not a very positive outlook. Unfortunately, this overall conclusion is based on faulty assumptions leading to spurious and incorrect forecasts and in this article we will briefly suggest why this is the case and take each of these four overall objections one by one.

1. The market penetration of a well-run cloud-based online billing business will take a long time and the impact will be small. The argument here is that Bank Bill Pay and “Biller direct” has already “locked up” much of the market and the small innovative online billing companies now have only the “crumbs from the rich guy’s table”. This assumes that both merchants and consumers are happy with these two currently available options. For a start only the largest billers typically have an online presentment and payment solution and even it may be slow and not easy to navigate (and creates a different user experience for the consumer for every merchant that has such a site). On the Bank/FI side, online bill payment is offered but presentment is either not available at all in most cases or is only at summary single line level (so the consumer can’t view a full digital bill). The consumer may also only be able to pay bills for large merchants and only from their checking account. Both of these parts of the market are therefore only “technology interludes”. They will be quickly swept away by a full and integrated digital portal-based technology and this is available from several of the innovators right now.

2. Consumer habits will be difficult to change It is true that consumer behavior is hard to change but it is not impossible. Look at the significant shift to internet banking in the last decade (which is what has mainly driven online bank bill pay in recent times). However, more significantly the pain is not essentially on the consumer side in the bill presentment and payment area-it is on the merchant side of the equation. Merchant pain here is considerable and long standing. Many merchants have been sending out paper-bills for decades and collecting payment by offline means (like cheque and cash) for as long. Even where they can take credit and debit cards they need to have a response team or call-centre, which is costly. But perhaps most significant (and this envelopes even those merchants that have switched to emailed invoices), the big merchant challenge is reconciliation, most of which is done manually and may require two, three or even four sets of data-keying. Online billing reduces this task to almost zero time and therefore on-going cost. And with a sophisticated cloud-based online billing and payment solution it also means no up-front capital cost and the avoidance of the months of time it may take to integrate with the local accounting software being used. This is a very big win for merchants and allows them to offer incentives to customers to switch to online payment or face extra costs if they do not. From a consumer perspective this not only quickly changes the thinking but if the online solution allows them to also get a bill on the phone as a text message, as an email or they can still print it if they wish, the resistance is likely to fast melt away.

3. New online bill presentment and payment functionality will not be very compelling Javelin are magnanimous enough to recognize that some of the innovators technology is “impressive” but then fail to draw the conclusion that it will be valuable. Once again, we have to look at the value to both consumers and to merchants themselves and when this is done, the benefits are substantial. There is insufficient space in a short article such as this to list the range of features offered by many individual innovators technology companies but if we look at Payswyft as one example, the consumer has the ability to see full bill detail instantly, 365 days of the year and 7 days a week, pay by almost any method (including cash remittance) can calendarise payments and set up automatic debits, can receive customized alerts, and track all bills (which they can progressive see from multiple merchants in one place under one login and password). And for the merchant, bills or invoices can be securely sent immediately they are ready in digital form (which cuts down delivery time and lost or undelivered problems), increased payment options are offered to consumers and accelerated cash-flow is created (as consumers on average pay earlier with an online transaction). This is not to mention the call-centre and reconciliation cost savings mentioned above. Even these few features are worth huge amounts of time and money for consumers and merchants and are therefore anything but trivial.

4. There is too much competition amongst these small innovators making substantial profit making unlikely Much of the payments industry see so-called “innovators” as either non-bank businesses trying to get into the payment space (like accounting software companies) or businesses that are supplying online billing software of some kind (which will always face a high integration hurdle). What they miss is the few companies that are neither of these-truly focused e-commerce, billing or payments companies that are mainly offering a cloud-based or hosted solution. Apart from a large company like PayPal who are trying to offer this kind of service in this sphere (and they have the financial muscle to be highly disruptive without facing much in the way of competition), most companies that are competing here are relatively small at the moment and there are not that many of them. This means that there is a chance to offer quite a differentiated service in particular geographies and within certain market verticals. In addition, there is potential for one or two of these to emerge as a market leader very quickly (most likely in the next 12-24 months) and create a “sea-change” in attitudes and behavior at all levels.

As if the counter-arguments to Javelins conclusions above are not enough to convince us that a big change is coming soon, there are many other compelling benefits that are available right now that will mean the innovative cloud-based bill presentment and payment company will make large inroads into this very large market. This includes the immediate availability of an e-commerce version of bill pay on any merchant web site that wants it, the scope to offer the same service for B2B transactions (and not just B2C which is often the only focus if research in this area). In addition, the ability of the innovator to now offer secure document delivery is not just a more convenient storage option (for consumer and merchants) but means that all online payment related documents like credit card statements and payment confirmations and notices can all go online and be delivered at a fraction of their current cost. Last but not least, all of this technology is available in the mobile sphere too, meaning that merchants can render electronic bills on a smart phone or tablet computer anywhere they have a connection and consumers can pay them on the same devices wherever they are (any place and at any time).

In conclusion, the world of bill presentment and payment has changed little for more than 50 years. The innovators are going to change this world dramatically and the time for this to happen is now.

What to Look for in an Online Bill Presentment and Payment Service

Online bill presentment and payment services are offered by not only many major billers and large banks nowadays but also by a range of smaller innovative financial services companies. All of these services claim to be broadly equivalent, with each of them offering a variety of bill presentment, management and payment features to make a consumer’s life apparently simpler and more efficient. However, these different services vary greatly in what they offer and in some cases the features they claim to have are not at all equivalent. A consumer therefore needs to take care to ensure that he or she selects the service that is most likely to fill his or her needs and in this brief article we therefore offer some hints on what to look for.

Below are what we see to be the main criteria by which any consumer should ideally evaluate any online bill presentment and payment service.

Bill Presentment
Bill presentment means the ability to see a bill in an online system of some kind. For most services this means either being able to see the bill in an email attachment (usually as a PDF) which is not really an online rendering at all (as it is just an electronic version of a paper bill). Some services offer a single line item bill view ahead of paying it. This is useful but far short of a full bill presentment. As a result, the most advanced services are offering a full digital bill which is one that is not only supplied in its entirety (even if it runs to several pages) but can be saved, sent on/forwarded or clicked on to effect payment.

Bill Management
Bill management features aim to keep a consumer on target for paying bills on time (or even early). A good service–provider should offer different alerts (ideally both email and/or SMS texts) that tell a consumer when his or her bills arrive, are due, are paid and are overdue/late (and in some cases the consumer can choose when and how to get these alerts). In addition, the consumer should always be able to view the details of the bill regardless of its format. Other useful features to look out for include a bill payment calendar and online notes. In the most sophisticated services bill storage is unlimited meaning that the consumer can store his or her bills indefinitely.

Payment Features
Good online bill paying services will often include a variety of payment features. However, many banking services may only offer bill payment from a checking account and large billers with online bill pay portals may only allow ACH and the major credit cards. The independent services are therefore more likely to offer much greater payment choice, and in some cases payment by online wallet, instant bank transfer and even cash (as well as almost all available credit and debit cards). A good service may also allow a consumer to choose which payments he or she wants to make each month individually and which he or she wants paid automatically (with a controlled payment like a direct debit).

Ease of Use/Setup
Apart from the site being user-friendly, online bill presentment and payment services at a given portal should be easy to setup and use, otherwise they don’t provide the convenience they promise. This should ideally mean the ability to pay a bill as a guest or first time visitor without registration on the service. And if a consumer does register, the system should remember as much data as has already been entered and the consumer should not be required to enter his or her payee and/or account information more than once.

Admin and Reporting convenience
Although consumers mainly pay their bills one at a time, they may want to more than this. A site which allows this functionality (and needs only one login and password for many bills) therefore has an advantage. This should include lots of analysis and reporting capabilities, looking at historical cumulative bill payments, aggregate data and even overall spend totals that may well be useful when it comes to end of year tax returns.

Service availability/Help/Support
Look for a service that is available 24 hours a day 7 days a week because most consumers will wish to pay bills outside normal office hours. There should also be good customer service support offered, both with available documentation and FAQ’s and a free call number when a consumer needs to talk to a customer service representative.

There are clearly other criteria that may well apply to choosing an online bill presentment and payment portal but these are the main categories under which a consumer can evaluate each service that is offered.

What do Postal Price Rises Really Mean for Billing Costs?

It was recently announced that a first-class stamp in the UK will rise in price from 46p to 60p (a 30% increase) and a second-class stamp will go up from 36p to 50p (a 39% increase). This reflects a worldwide trend in postal prices increasing dramatically (as less and less letters are sent in the mail and therefore make the post office burden so much harder to cover) and causing those businesses which bill their customers in the mail to have to bear the extra costs. For a larger biller (perhaps doing 50,000 bills a month) this adds £84,000 p.a and for a small business (doing say 2,500 bills a month) it adds £4,200.

These are significant relative costs in a channel that already presents additional challenges for merchants over other options. This includes the need to have to print and fold invoices and have to stuff them into envelopes, wait the 2-3 days until they are delivered (excepting a small percentage that never reach the customer’s given address!) and even get lost somewhere along the delivery route (and therefore have to be resent). Postal delays, go-slows and strikes can also impact significantly on businesses, and none of these factors does anything to help critical cash-flow (assuming that the customer does not lose their paper invoice and manages to pay on time).

So, what can businesses do about yet more costs that have to be absorbed in these difficult economic times? The obvious answer is to ask customers to accept an online invoice and cut out paper and envelopes and all mail costs completely. In the above two examples this not only removes the respective £300,000 and £15,000 annual postal costs completely, but by the time you add in the extra internal costs of printing, folding, stuffing, and envelopes probably saves twice as much-or around £600,000 and £30,000.

Unfortunately, if the above step of switching to ebilling were easy, every business of any size or type would be doing it. In reality, the inhibitors have historically been many including the often immediately prohibitive need to spend up-front capital on ebilling software (and pay annually to maintain it). In addition, the introduction of a new online billing system typically disrupts normal operations for months (often costing significant time and money) in order to transition to the new approach (not forgetting that customers also have to be converted to use the new system too). This all assumes that you have the customer email addresses to which you can send the bills or invoices of course. In the past, these kind of inhibitors have added too much cost and/or hassle for most businesses and they have no choice but to stay with their traditional way of doing things-until now that is.

In recent years, third-party online ebilling portals like PaySwyft for example, have been developed which overcome many of the problems described above. First and foremost this kind of portal offers almost an immediate opportunity to send full digital invoices to customers (often within days of signing up to use this “cloud-based” service) and on a pay-as-you-go basis, meaning there is no need for any capital outlay or annual software maintenance costs. And because every merchant has a unique merchant number or ID, customers can go to the portal to pay a bill without a business having to know their email address. Customers can then pay instantly, or register at the site (which means that a business progressively “scrapes” the email address for customers (who will often want to use their email or SMS alerts to remind them when bills are due). This means that customers can be weaned slowly but surely away from paper over time, as they become increasingly comfortable that all their bills are stored, emailable and printable whenever they like, and they can therefore safely turn off the paper bill they get in the mail. Best of all, the business not only starts to save the cost of sending paper bills and the postage costs but gains the added advantage of having a fully integrated set of payment options (often greater in diversity than they offered previously) that are now available (such as every credit card for instance). This aids cash-flow, lessens calls to the business to pay by phone and massively helps bill and payment reconciliation.

Summary
The transition to online billing is always a challenge but by using a portal-based system hosted in the cloud, it is many times easier than it was and can almost immediately start to save substantial time and cost. And now that postal expensive are going up so significantly, all businesses have even more reason to therefore consider making the change now.

Will an “iTunes” Type of Web site for ebilling Ever Come into Being?

Last month an interesting article was published on a blog which made a very useful reference to on line music, and iTunes in particular, in relation to ebilling. In his article the author suggested that if we thought about bills in music terms:
• CDs (and the artists that produce them) are like paper bills;
• Listening to music online is like logging in to a portal to view and pay your bill; and
• Downloading a song (file) to your chosen device from iTunes is like receiving your bill as a file (attachment) to your PC, tablet, iPhone, Android, Blackberry etc.

This article rather strangely goes on to conclude that all music and bills should be delivered by email attachment so that customers can open it/them on all their different listening or reading devices.

Despite that fact that this article seems to get a little lost quite quickly, it does draw a useful general analogy and it is therefore worth looking at the core question that it hints at but never answers-will an iTunes type of web site for ebilling ever come into being (and how of course)?

First and foremost let’s get the comparisons right here:
• Songs (or “albums” of songs) should be compared to bills in general
• Artists should be compared to merchants (and some of both are very large and some are tiny)
• Record companies should be compared to banks
• Music listeners should be compared to customers or bill payers
• CD’s (or Vinyl) should be compared to paper-delivered bills
• Online Audio type files (MP3’s, WAVs etc) should be compared to online emails with attachments
• An online store (like iTunes) should be compared to an online bill-payment portal

You’ll notice that we do not yet talk about a delivery device like a smart phone or tablet in the above table-we’ll cover this later.

The Music Scene
If we look back at recent history, up until as little as 10 years ago, the music industry had been operating in similar fashion for decades. Artists produced songs and approached record companies to back them. If they were successful, the record company would help getting the song(s) to market on vinyl as a single or a long play record, getting the songs played on radio and elsewhere so that people would buy what they liked in main street record stores. Innovation in the music industry was very slow to come. Vinyl eventually became CD’s and radio went slowly from analogue to digital. However, the biggest changes were in listening devices, which became increasingly portable. This was led by Sony’s “Walkman” in 1979-the first step towards MP3 players which led to the huge industry paradigm shift-the iPod-introduced in late 2001 (and the new iTunes music store two years later in 2003).

When Apple arrived on the music scene the portable MP3 scene was ripe for change to something simpler and more appealing to customers. In this sense, the iPod, iTouch and finally the iphone and iPad all became the simplest and most user-friendly way to listen to music (both on a live streaming basis and recorded). As a result, the music industry has been almost completely transformed commercially and listeners (or at least those with a 3G/4G connection and/or access to the Internet) have more choice and convenience than they ever had before.

The Billing Scene
So how does this compare to the billing sector? Like music, billing has operating in similar ways for decades. Bills (the song comparison) have been and still are delivered mostly in very traditional ways, especially by small and medium sized merchants (the artist comparison). This is by paper in the mail as the simplest format (a bit like the vinyl single) or by mail with a plain PDF attachment (the CD comparison). In some cases, the email with attachment may be a little more dynamic and sophisticated and can collect signatures for example (used in the B2B billing world). This is more comparable to the MP3 or wav files in the music world.

Although a dominant player like Apple and a site like iTunes has yet to “explode” in the billing world, we are getting very close to it happening now. For some years, online bill payment has been available at a merchant’s web site, although this does make for some inconvenience for customers when they need to pay a lot of bills (or listen to a lot of songs from different artists at different record companies). Online bill payment has also been available at bank sites for many years now and has become quite well-used by the same people who took quickly to Internet banking. Unfortunately, full digital presentment is not normally available via this channel, so both of these valuable innovations are comparable to the “Walkman”-they have taken us some of the way but there is room for improvement.

The private “cloud-based” bill presentment and payment portal is a much newer innovation in the last 2-3 years, and is much closer to being the billing “paradigm shift” we talked about earlier. In this system, customers can see bills from a given merchant (an artist in music terms) and subscribe to get all the bills they send (or songs they release). Because this is non-merchant owned or bank owned (the equivalent of sometimes cutting out the record companies), customers can see many merchants (or artists), and thus have the capacity to ultimately start to see all of their bills in one place. Naturally, paying bills is never a fun activity like listening to music but the quicker and more easily you can deal with them the better (and you can get back to what you like doing much more speedily). Having all your bills in one online place (with free back and storage and easy retrieval whenever you need access) is the equivalent of getting all of their songs in one playbook-just as iTunes allows now. Customers can then keep these bills (or songs) permanently stored in one place and revisit them whenever they like. These bills are all fully digital and do not have multiple file formats that have to be tackled (much as Apple made MP3, WAV and other music file formats an irrelevance to the listener).

Perhaps most importantly, customers can access their bills at the portal from any device that is connected to the Internet by some means-a computer, a smart phone, a tablet etc. And because this is all digital, customers can use all of the currently available and evolving technology that is available such as bookmarking, flexible sorting (like assembling playlists) and using SMS alerts for example (to prompt the customer when there is a bill to pay or a credit card to update, just as you would when a new song or album by an artist has been released). Of course this is not to exclude other ways of getting a bill in any other format that may be wanted-you can still send an email or a PDF or even print them if you like.

Summary
We are not suggesting that bills are anywhere near as much fun to ‘access’ as music and you will of course listen to the same song a lot more than you will use the same bill. However, we think the broad analogy here is a useful one. Our general conclusion is that the online bill presentment and payment portal is already here and like iTunes will transform the bill payment sector over the next few years just as Apple did. There are a few innovative companies that are competing to be the “big gorilla” at the moment but it is inevitable that one of these will emerge soon as the dominant player in this space. A few early adopters (the merchants or artists as they would be in the music scene) already understand this and are quickly getting on board. For these merchants this is a relatively painless transition, with no capital outlay and they can be in the online bill presentment and payment space almost immediately to reap the benefits.

Will Mobile Devices Soon be the Dominant Channel for Payment Transactions?

In the last 9-12 months, those of us in the financial services industry might be forgiven for thinking that the main issues to face and gain advantage from in the near future is going to be who will win the lion’s share of the mobile market when it comes to payment transactions. This arises because of the huge rise in smart phone sales all over the world in the last few years and in more recent times, the fast growth of tablet computer devices (both of which create great mobility for customers). While both of these innovations are certainly exciting and possibly “game-changing” in this article, we will briefly explore whether they will soon really become the dominant payment channel of choice, as many people seem to believe they will. We will therefore look at arguments for and against this prediction.

The arguments for the case
Without doubt, along with wireless access internet innovation, smart phones are a transformational technology. This technology allows individuals to perform many everyday tasks that previously were done via traditional telephony or even on paper in some instances. The same can be said for the newer but just as ground-breaking tablet computers. The added value here is that the larger screen format allows what was previously done mainly on a personal computer in one location to be done almost anywhere because of the high level of portability and touch screen convenience. As we all know, very soon even aeroplanes will allow the use of both smart phones and tablets via the internet (and the last bastion of true peace from cell phones and computers will disappear).

Of course the two “gorilla issues” here are the use of NFC or Near Field Communication technology which allows the smart phone to become a credit or debit card, and the linked facility of a smart phone as an electronic or digital wallet, capable of storing value and therefore having the capacity to readily make may payment transactions including person-to-person payments.

NFC has a short range of about 1.5 inches. This makes it a good choice for secure transactions, such as contactless credit card payments. Smart phones can therefore “tap and go” using infrastructure already in place for credit card systems such as MasterCard’s PayPass program or Visa’s payWave.

Smart phones can now also replace customer loyalty cards, not only by storing retail store credit card information, but also automatically select the right customer loyalty card information for a given consumer purchase.

The “digital wallet” concept could extend to coupons and other offers. Consumers can now download coupons from a web site, which they exchange by having their phone swiped at the point of purchase. The retailers benefit from being able to track who their coupons are sent to and how they are used.

If you add in the benefits of smart phone tickets (for trains, buses an car parking for example) and the use of phone-based barcodes (as infrastructure allows) we can quickly see how this technology will dramatically change the consumer purchase experience in many areas (especially at the retail level) and help many merchants to gain efficiencies and save costs.

The arguments against the case
In considering the arguments against the proposition that mobile technology is soon going to be the dominant channel for payments, it is worth establishing a few facts about smart phones and tablets. Firstly, there were around 450 million smart phones sold around the world in 2011. As there are about 5.5 Billion mobiles phones in total (which means that around 80% of the world population own one) smart phones represent about 8% of the total-a number expected to go to 12% within 5 years and 20% in 10 years-meaning around 1.2 billion smart phones will be owned by 2022.

As far as tablet computers are concerned, there were around 75 million of them sold in 2011 (compared to 440 million PC sales), with predictions of at least 250 million in 5 years and 750 million with 10 years (although these figures are much more speculative of course). As a percentage of all computers (there are around 1.3 billion computers in use in total in 2011), this means that tablets represent about 4% of the market today, predicted to grow to 7% in 5 years and 15% in 10 years. The reason that % growth of tablets is much slower proportionally than smart phones by the way is that PCs have a much longer life, with companies and individuals holding on to them for 4-5 years or longer before upgrading or changing.

Given the above, it is difficult to see how mobile technology can quickly become the dominant channel for payment, even before we consider other issues. At best in 5 years time only 12% and 7% of consumers (with each technology respectively) will be able to pay on their tablets and smart phones (and only if they wish to of course). This is higher in the younger age groups naturally and is still a lot of transactional volume but not dominant by any means.

To add to the above, about 75% of all payments transactions today take place “offline”. In other words, bills are sent out by physical mail or email (with PDF attachments) and are still paid over the counter with cash and debit/credit cards and by cheques in the mail or by phone or voice over IP. Larger payments are made via internet banking via direct debit and by businesses via bank payment systems such as wire transfer for instance. It is hard to see any of these processes changing quickly, especially in the B2B space, although cheque volumes will continue to decline at the expenses of electronic payment for both consumers and businesses.

Perhaps the other major disadvantage of mobile technology is one of available infrastructure. All smart phones and tablets create much greater accessibility but are only useful when they are connected. 3G and 4G is expensive today for large data packets and access to the Internet relies on old-world “hubs”-most of which rely on old copper-wire systems. NFC technology is perhaps less encumbered as it is more like “Bluetooth” but it still needs a device with which to communicate, and in a payment situation this means that every retailer needs a reading device. Installing such devices is happening of course but it will take time and will only penetrate those market verticals where it makes sense.

So what does it all mean?
Now that we have all of the above figures and facts on both the plus and minus side what does all this mean for payments? Well, its obvious that the times are changing and in the consumer world we will see very fast rises in payments being made not only online in years to come (at the expense of more traditional methods) but a large proportion of these will be made on smart phones and tablet computers, especially in the under 30 population. However, as a proportion of the total transactional volume it is likely to be much slower than the media hype suggests. This is because retail (where much of the take-up will occur, makes up only 10% of the consumer transactional volume. Consumers themselves, of course, are typically only half of the total market transactional volume and less than a quarter of the payment value. The rest is taken up by Government and Business and both of these are likely to take many years to adopt mobile technology into mainstream payment systems-perhaps 15-20 years. For this reason, and the fact that we continue to leverage old system payment “rails”, we can conclude that mobile devices are interesting and growing as a payment option but will be far from dominant for a few years yet. Smart phones (with NFC technology) are therefore likely to slowly replace the “bricks and mortar” retail market (helping customers to migrate from a plastic card to a mobile device). And as both smart phones and tablets are effectively mobile enabled PC’s that will make all forms of payments easier and increase/accelerate on-line payment activity this will be a good thing for both merchants and consumers when it comes to the ease with which future payments can be made.

Are PDF Invoices better or worse than old-fashioned paper invoices?

A recent study published by AIIM on progress towards the paperless office makes interesting reading as it relates to current billing practices. The study is worth taking note of because apart from AIIM being a credible non-profit research business which has been around for almost 70 years, as the chart below indicates it was a very large survey of companies of almost all sizes. In addition, the study went to companies in multiple sectors all over the world (although around 50% of the companies were in the US).

What the Study Showed
As we all know, the capability to exchange PDF files as e-mail attachments is said to have reduced the volume of paperwork traded between companies and small businesses considerably. However, this study says that the reduction is minimal at best, but quite possibly creates more paperwork than it saves.

In specific terms, the study revealed the following facts about PDF as invoices
• Over three-quarters of people surveyed say one of the first things they do with a PDF-based invoice… is print it out.
• From the 77% of the 395 respondents that print out their invoices, 16% scan the invoices right back into the system for use as……PDF attachments.
• 10% of people print out their PDF invoices multiple times.
• 10% of people say they print out at least one copy for archival purposes.

The chart relating to this data is shown below:

What is happening to Invoices?
Although many of the larger companies in the survey seem to be pressing to have all-electronic billing and payment systems, it seems that we are still a long way from this ideal (perhaps as few as 2-3% of companies have a fully digital system which includes no printing and only digital storage systems). However, many businesses are at least trying to save on postage and paper costs by sending invoices as PDF files, or as faxes. However, even here the invoices are often printed out as paper, sometimes at both ends, which almost completes defeats the object. Such practices obviously do not generally result in a reduction of paper within the receiving business in particular. As we saw from the statistics earlier in total, 77% of respondents are likely to print at least one copy of a PDF invoice, and 16% admit to printing it out and then scanning it in for capture, as do 31% receiving a faxed invoice.

Are new more “intelligent” PDF’s the answer?
Most respondents to the AIIM survey were referring to the basic PDF files generated by their Acrobat software, which are obviously less feature-rich than intelligent PDFs have become in recent years with functionality such as XML files being included with all the relevant invoices and embedded payment buttons and even digital signature capture systems. Although this is undoubtedly an improvement, the adoption of these more function-rich PDFs has been very slow and in most cases has had little impact on the rate at which companies of all sizes continue to print out and scan invoices. This is partly because, a PDF is still regarded as paper in real terms-it may be electronic but it is not easy to digitize in ways that are useful for data transfer and exchange. Full digitalization is therefore the goal of many organizations and this is why scanning remains popular. In this regard, when asked what the biggest drivers are for scanning, responses were mainly about data-exchange, availability and flexibility (as the chart below from the survey indicates).

So what are the implications?
PDF’s are very convenient as a way to send documents electronically but far less so when it is an invoice. The speed of the sending process is better than physical mailing but so many people are printing it out anyway, it is far short of being the “path to digitization” that companies of all sizes want or need. Fully digital invoices seem to be a much more attractive option and when an invoice can be presented in full in third-party cloud-based portals such as those such at PaySwyft, any company gets all of this immediately.